Danqazmlp

Three lines really doesn't constitute a wall of text, especially when it is broken up. Even so, that is no reason to de-rail a thread, so please, back on topic and no text-wall discussing posts. Thanks

Got the original Fable today. I've completed the second but decided to try the first. I'm playing it as a prequel instead of thinking of it as the first game. It is much better than I thought, and runs much better than I expected on my laptop. The combat is a bit harder, partly due to having the second on a console and not PC but also due to it not feeling as smooth and relying on the combo meter. But it is fun and has dome features I wish the second had. I do miss some of the customisation though.

Why do you continue to post in this thread if this is such a trivial issue to you? I think it can be good to get the view of somebody who isn't involved in either party. An unbiased viewpoint and all that. I'm not sure of what has recently happened to spark people off yet again, but until we get an official reply from Jagex (yes it is taking a while but there is nothing we can do about it, patience is a virtue), nobody can know for sure what is and isn't legal. What we have to do is weigh up the facts we have available and judge for ourselves what is/isn't. That is pretty much set in stone and won't be changing unless we are shown proof of the legality of the scripts present. If a link is advertised to said forum, it will be removed according to the current rules. To the above, we try to be as consistent as possible with all forum members, but when somebody is incredibly visible due to posting a lot there is obviously much more chance of them being caught for breaking the rules. Just as somebody who often breaks signature rules will have moderators looking at their signature more often. Unless people use the report function, it is logical that the most visible people will be those caught for breaking the rules. There is nothing that can be done about that.

I just hope it still has as much of a free feel as the first two did.

It may not come as a surprise to some that I'm a very large Carmageddon fan. The second is ranked in my top 3 games of all time, with the first not far behind. The 4th game was cancelled years ago due to the third game, TDR 3000 failing badly, but this site registered to Square Enix has gone online:http://www.carmageddon.com/ It ends the week before E3 so could lead to a nice big reveal, who knows? I am incredibly excited for this as Carmageddon 4 is something I have wanted for years. I would love it even more if they were to name it Carma 3, totally erasing the mistake that was TDR 3000 from history. If you don't know what Carmageddon was, you should watch this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3rxAoPlCy4 This game was released back in the 20th Century, so the graphics can't compare to today, but it had some great things about it: - Robust physics, allowing cars to be split in half, folded like a piece of paper or simply blown to pieces. - Large free roaming maps including cities, an airport, a ski resort and a funfair, years before Gta or Driver even attempted it. - Lots of pedestrians ready to run over in an explosion of blood and ragdoll physics with limbs that could come off. Not just human too, cows, dogs, sheep, penguins and even elephants. - Incredible powerups, ranging from changing the gravity and pinball mode where everything bounces off everything else wildly, to mutant tails for your car and the repulsifiers, giant springs which could repel both pedestrians and other cars for miles (or into a wall) The above video contains only things which are doable in-game, no mods other than extra car skins. That's how free the game was. As long as they continue where Carma 2 left off, a new one could be incredible. Is anybody else excited or it it just me?

Indeed killerred. Also don't forget, I will be keeping the names corresponding to each picture private unless told otherwise by the person.

Can we have a clue?

I agree. Right now I wish we could have last year back. I think part of the problem is that the FIA keep messing with the rules every year meaning teams can't just have a car and upgrade it, but have to have a brand new one each year. It means we end up with cars with such a large performance gap. Shame Vettel won yet again, although Hamilton did give him a good run for his money. Luckily, it's Monaco next week which constantly bucks the trend with who wins, being much much more about skill than who has the car.

so Vettel isn't on pole, but he is second and Red Bull are looking fairly sure to win, again. We have had three of the best seasons for a very long time in a row, and have moved to one of the worst.

Please use this topic: http://forum.tip.it/topic/294165-the-world-is-ending-on-may-21st/

So it seems even more now since my original post, that those who have had circumcisions support them being allowed, while those without don't support it. That alone should start alarm bells ringing.

I agree. I'm a bit bored of him winning now. Although I supported Schumacher back in the day, I was too young to actually realise how boring it must have made the sport for others. I am a bit biased here, but all we need is Kubica back in a fast car and Vettel would be down a position immeditately :thumbup:

No, because that would be mutilation as both parts are important, both physically and socially. It is like taking out your appendix, it does very little if anything at all, so cannot be considered mutilation.

A good first step might be learning what a circumcision is. what makes you think I dont know what it is. Still falls under involuntary genital mutilation. lets see health positives, cleanliness and supposively making std's harder to transfer [positive source on that? or is it only case studies that cant be replicated?] Unless your the guy in the bathing thread who refuses to bathe forever this probably wont be a problem, and STD's will still transfer easily if you dont use a condom. If anything circumcision does make you less sensitive as the foreskin removes is very sensitive. You know, I love it when people use made up arguments. According to this source, it Increases sexual sensitivity and reduced the chances of contracting HIV. Also concluding no adverse effects: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00979.x/abstract;jsessionid=BF507BA24691034ECDE916A8ACD2E79C.d03t02?systemMessage=Wiley+Online+Library+will+be+disrupted+21+May+from+10-12+BST+for+monthly+maintenance There are also these publications from both the UN and a major medical organisation: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/resources/factsheets/circumcision.htm http://www.who.int/hiv/mediacentre/MCrecommendations_en.pdf So, please continue using you're imagined arguments, but they will probably be ignored from this point forward. The same can also go to Nomrombom. I am not saying these are conclusive, but they have much more weight than your argument. Please refrain from using assumptions when trying to negate my arguments.

so the mutilation of childrens body parts is alright as long as a holy book allows it and it doesnt have many negative health affects? Did I say anything about the holy book? Please stop putting words in my mouth, it is not wanted. Yes, as long as it has no negative effects on health or the life of the person at all, I see no problem with it. It is much more like an ear piercing than any other procedure. As I said, there are as far as I know, no negative effects on those who have had it done (although those who have here may be able to give some insight into that) so has no negative effects on the life of those at all. Using the word mutilation is massively exaggeration it. Considering the possibility of it having positive health effects, it seems like it could be more irresponsible to not have it done. But then, that would be not doing it based on our faith right?

Edit: @ Ring: That's because for males, there are very few negatives if any for doing it, even the possibility of health benefits. The same cannot be said for females, so they cannot be compared at all.

If you want to pull that card, why allow parents to make any body-related decisions for their children at all? Oh for christ sake, circumcision is a choice that should be decided by the guy himself when he is old enough, not due to religious or whatever belief, unless it's a medical situation. This is my, so it seems, crazy viewpoint on this forum. I'm glad my parents decided to get mine done as an infant. If you wait until the person is conscious enough to make the personal choice, that would mean he's now reached the point where circumcision is more painful, difficult, dangerous, and will now actually be aware of the not so comfortable experience. So circumcision is a painful, difficult, dangerous, uncomfortable medical procedure that is FORCED upon a very young child. The benefits of circumcision are miniscule in a first world country like the United States. It IS forced mutilation. In many places, forced mutilation is considered torture. Let's say I create a religion which follows our god saying that we must cut off our big toes. Nobody would allow or support it. But they support and allow circumcision... TL;DR Circumcision is (in the way it is done without consent of the victim) a human rights violation. I think this has to be the best example I have ever seen of twisting somebodies words. The procedure is more dangerous/painful once they are aware, as in, not children.

Looking at this thread, the only people who have had the procedure (is that what you would call it?) Support it, and do not support the vote. Then, it seems as if it is only those who would never have it done, never have had it done and are of other faiths which support it. Those who have had it done do not seem as fussed. Seems a bit judgemental. Those who it won't effect having all the say, doesn't seem right.

These things are all basically rip-off extreme ironing.

There is no need to ban it, doing so is just intolerant of their beliefs. I'm surprised such a Liberal city has put forward such a thing.

I'll keep it separate but I will make a list like I did with the last grid with every bodies name and where they are positioned. Some people may not like to have their name associated with their picture and identity kept private.

:cry: I'd actually be quite annoyed if they released Episode three and not a full sequel now. It's been so long.

If this doesn't happen now, permission to ban Dire Wolf?

Well the HYT is kind of the forum name thing. I was wondering who would be the first entrant. Thanks Steve. Not much of a grid yet though, more of a Stevepole appreciation rectangle.

Indeed.