ortiz9471

Let me guess, you're F2P. A member wouldn't use it, there are far better weapons. And there would be no point in putting it in F2P, F2P doesn't get updates. And also, wouldn't that be the same things as a 2h sword? Just use the R2H. You don't need it. If it ain't broke don't fix it. :wink:

Nice grammar and spelling. Truly amazing. And you admit to lieing to Jagex, saying you were 13 when you weren't? Nice. And if you know more about RS then him, that would imply that you've been playing for a while, would it not? Then you played when you were even younger. I don't see how hard it is to follow a simple age rule. And don't say you have to play because you're addicted or something like that - while you were making your account you weren't addicted. Sorry if that was a little harsh...

There are monkeys in the Ardougne zoo. There are no monkeys on crash island. You have to be close to monkeys (your question wasn't why it doesn't work on Karamja) for it to work, and you are close to monkeys in Ardougne. It's really obvious, tbh.

Firemakin has a total of 999 now. And go look him up on highscores, the amount of exp he has in skills is kinda interesting :

Somebody sold full rune to the general store in world 1, kinda funny because I think they only got about 130k for it and the price at the time was 200k.

I play ultimate frisbee, wrestle, play football, have a great group of friends I hang out after school all the time, am hosting a party tomorow night :D , and managed to quit RS, I'm a A/B student depending on the class, and proudly have a life :!:

Personally I got into fishing and made enough money for a mask (about 350k-450k at the time) pretty quick. But no, I spent it all pking, and lost it all because I had no clue what I was doing.

Well if this is happening, then it doesn't. It's not a glitch, or a bug, it's just him not getting the kill.

The people who are lame enough to think the F word makes them look cooler. However, even worse is the people who want to look cool by doing something bad like swearing,* but think it's too naughty, and flip you off instead. *please note, I don't think it makes you look cool. Or that it's bad. I'm talking about other people.

archaelogy costing little money? sincerly doubt that.

Don't try to be someone you're not and on that topic, don't be afraid to be yourself :D Even if you're pulling complete BS, if you say it with confidence most peers/teachers/coworkers/etc. will believe you.

Sure, why not : Sounds good to me.

So basically, everybody would just go buy the high quality stuff and be better off? What if you worked months for 85 slayer. Spend 6 hours killing abbys. Get a whip drop. "Poor quality." Go sell for 300k. Great. No.

When somebody kills a dragon and get a dragon bone, they aren't bringing in 1.5k that the bone costs. They sell it to somebody else who pays them. But the money they pay for the dragonbone isn't just created, they got it somewhere. Sorry if that doesn't make sense.. but you're so so wrong on many points.

macroers can easily get by that. It's the same concept as the box..

Most people only get 1 set of god armor, so they could just buy rune and that would be it. Bye-bye 90% of the already pretty dead god armor market. Bad idea..

That makes no sense. What if you see somebody else saying that, do you automatically win? :-s It's part of their strategy. If you think it's cheating, turn it off.

Meh, not quite old enough for a license. Too many topics with the same basic form "what ____ do you _____ " Kinda weird, but gives me something to think about..

My sister was in Ohio last weekend for an Ultimate Frisbee (the best sport in the world) tournament, does that count? : Kinda weird it was in Ohio, because the top 8 high school teams in the country are invited. But every team was from New England or New York. The winning team was Amherst, MA. Sick team.. just plain amazing. My sisters team got 2nd \

I'm sorry but I beleive i do have a face. Also on the word nub. Do you know that a nub is a small lump or chunk? That is not a type of person. Uh-oh, Lieutenant Literal is on the case! Y'know what? I'm gonna use that name! =P~ Sir, whatever makes you happy, sir! People can be small lumps or chunks, sir :-w

I looked for May 21, 1993. Didn't find anything interesting to me. (Yes today is my 14th birthday : )

I spent 2.5 years developing an account, and when I was incorrectly banned then incorrectly put into -52 days of credit I said screw it and quit. I used to be pretty darn addicted, but not as much as most people. I never no-lifed or anything or stayed up to play RS, or woke up early. Basically Jagex messed up with my account.. wanted $20.. and I said no. And quit.

Wow, best quote ever, sorry for the off topic but that has to be siged :D I might have a look later. Wow Second Best Quote Ever! That's gotta be siggied! Thrid best quote ever, not gonna siggy it. Anyway leave the learning to school. A quote train huh? i think i'll join in :D I hate educational games ever since my old maths teacher would force you to play them. "Can't i just do questions from the text-book?" "NO!!! PLAY YOUR GAMES AND BE QUIET!" I remember in elemtary school when if we got to play the math games instead of textbooks, it was a treat.

Anybody who thinks English is hard should try learning Russian.. I went to a meeting to have an intro to Russian to see if I wanted to take it in highschool. Sooo hard.

Well I take Latin, so I definetly know about verb conjugations Instead of changing the ending of the word, English adds other words around the original word. For example: Present Active Tense: Navigo, Navigare: to sail English = Latin I sail = Navigo You sail = Navigas He/She/It sails = Navigat We sail = Navigamus You all sail = Navigatis They sail = Navigant So instead of Latin, where you have the present active conjugation displayed here, in English we just add pronouns before the verbs. It must be just as hard to memorize all the pronouns then all the linking helping verbs. For example, for the 1 helping verb we learn in English, there is a whole new conjugation for that in Latin. Future Active Tense: Navigo, Navigare: to sail English = Latin I will sail = Navigabo You will sail = Navigabas He/She/It will sail = Navigabat We will sail = Navigabamus You all will will = Navigabatis They will sail = Navigabant Sure, you're thinking that they are similar. All you do is add the base for the future tense, which is the -ba. But how is that harder then learning one simple word, will? And this is just for the active tense. When you get into passive the Latin conjugations get much harder then the English translations. Also, this is practically the same exact thing for the Dative and Accusative cases, it's just that those go for nouns not verbs. Another you point you make is the noun gender. Big woop, you change the -o to an -a. Oh dang, that was some intense stuff. Please tell me, how would having no exact way of making something plural, make a language easier. It would be so much easier if their was a definite rule on how to make things plural. Irregulars confuse people, and everyday I hear adults speak with improper grammar. I'm 14 and have trouble holding myself back from correcting people with poor use of grammar. Then there are words like good and bad, which are used sooo horribly today. "Mom, how did your job interview go today?" "It went good, son." or "It went bad, son." You don't do good, you don't do bad. Sure, if you're donating to a charity, you're technically "doing good." If you shoot somebody, you're technically "doing bad." (However their are far more proper ways of saying both of those.) But if something went well, it went well, not good. If something went poorly, it went poorly, not bad. I'm just bringing that up to help say that grammar is a major issue in the English language, and most people don't realize it. Not even neccessarily because the grammar is hard, but because Americans have slaughtered it with their lazyness. (I'm American, don't get mad at me for ripping them.) I'm not saying Latin is easier then English. In fact, Latin is a (cabbage) load harder than English. I'm just saying that before making a point, prepare to have background evidence.