Blyaunte

We have cookiez. :3 And yes you should definitely give it a try, you'll be surprised at how much time you'll save by using the best methods to whatever skill. Well -- yes, I've missed the point, and no I haven't missed the point. Point is, I'm keen to get more "efficient" in my training ... You obviously don't know me very well then -- because I LOL'd irl. Oh and:

Actually, yesterday on W159, we sat and watched PMOD ignore a "broken" bot in Edgeville. She did nothing -- didn't even report it -- while it kept trying to bank and typed "000000000000000000000000000000000" over and over again ... Hell - she couldn't even be bothered to mute the damn thing. :rolleyes:

To be honest -- I've usually chosen "fun" over efficient in the past. That said -- I'm game to give "efficiency" a try. Wait! Does this mean I've gone over to the dark side? :blink:

Anyone check the list of clans lately? *cough* "Autobots" *cough*

Thread = tl/dr Is there a site/guide/whatchamathingit for "efficient" training for "all" skills anywhere? :unsure: I'd be seriously interested in reading THAT! Thanks! <3:

Using the "//" and "///" is going to take some getting used to. Hell -- I typed "Hi everyone" last night FOUR TIMES before I finally managed to get it into the right chat ... :oops:

Pics? Commentary? Enquiring minds want to know! :shades:

I noticed that too. This thread is surprisingly empty for the biggest update of the month. To be fair, everyone was on tip.it yesterday because they got kicked out of the game, but that still doesn't explain where everyone's disappeared to this time. Seriously, guys, where are you? Well -- if you followed all the HYPE -- this is supposedly the (second?) biggest update of the YEAR (behind the return of the Wildy + FT) ... Still - there doesn't seem to be much excitement over this one. :unsure: Curious ...

That's because people actually cared about that yesterday. This is crap. Pointless waste of resources for how much it'll be used. And so why the hell does Jagex keep creating stuff for PKers/Clans? :thumbdown: Well - it's all about the "community" dontcha know ... :unsure:

Jagex claimed that there were 1 million PAID memberships in May 2007 ("the Golden Age"). Indications are that their numbers have likely increased since that date.

I try to avoid it as much as possible ... :unsure:

On a side note: Off Topic -1.5 Isn't it interesting to note that, despite this release being issued some 5 hours ago, we're merely on page 3 of discussion of this issue AND there's only 44 people reviewing this thread. Meanwhile, yesterday, when Runescape went scuppers -- the comments poured forth on this thread and there were over 230 people viewing it at any one time. :unsure:

They JUST did an update. Derp! :rolleyes:

It's update day, usually the bots are devoid then. Also, the recent clan changes brought some pretty major changes to how the game and even the site is scripted. So, I suspect there won't be much bots for a few days. ... and yet, once again, Jagex goes a-bot-bustin' -- entirely by accident ... :rolleyes:

Just what Runescape needs -- rich kids with daddy's credit card = "elite" players ... <_< No. No. No. and Hell No.

.. and the rest were bots!??!?!? :unsure: :lol:

True dat -- Jagex is more like the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation ... <_<

When the going gets tough, the Leafs go golfing ... :rolleyes:

Oh lol i thought i was a picture of Jagexs custom support workers. :unsure: Here's your Customer Support: [hide][/hide] Laughed so hard. :mrgreen: And for Dire, may I present Jagex's new and highly antipated bot detection system. She's ready, willing, and able to stamp the "banned" forms in triplicate, sent in, sent back, queried, lost, found, subjected to public inquiry, lost again, and finally buried in soft peat for three months and recycled as firelighters Best quote-chain in this forums I have ever seen. Honestly. Mod Emilee here busy answering questions on the forums: [hide][/hide] You'd better wise-up before she starts reading you some of her poetry ... :unsure:

Well -- it's a consensus! :thumbsup: Please now ignore my earlier question/input. :shades:

So -- you didn't actually read my post. What a shocker. :rolleyes: Oh -- and this is the "Obligatory Ice Hockey Thread" -- not the "NHL" thread. You removed content that was applicable to the forum topic, and germane to the subject matter at hand.

Or get to frosties and use the frosty bones ? :unsure:

1. Then why not simply remove the offensive CONTENT and not the entire post? 2. If you'd read my post, you'd know my son was the goal-tender -- he wasn't "benched". 3. As a Red Wings fan, I'd LIKE to agree with you, but they're too banged up to go that far this season. We're already playing our 3rd string goaltender ... :unsure:

You know, it amuses me to see how people cannot comprehend that the 869th (out of 879) player in +/- isn't a liability. I am not saying that all players with a negative +/- are a liability I am saying that the 869th player (out of 879) IS A LIABILITY. I am also saying that, to trade away three (3 THREE) potential super-star prospects for the 869th biggest liability on the ice is a bad move. Now please tell me which of those two concepts is beyond your scope of comprehension?