Blyaunte

Wasn't Justin Beiber's 15 minutes of fame over a long long time ago? :unsure:

I can't see Crawford getting the Calder -- it's damn hard for a goalie to break that "glass barrier", especially when there's other rookies who are achieving good stats in the same year ... <_<

Orly? And what, pray-tell is Jagex doing about them? :rolleyes:

Edit: NVM - I misread this ...

Perhaps our discussion point should not be the (rather obvious) issue of whether or not there's more botting in Runescape now than previously before. The issue is really, inasmuch as Jagex seems unwilling or unable to act against them, what becomes of the game when, eventually, it all turns into "botscape"?

I LOL'd irl at the Tzhaar bit, then found the rest of it less funny till it got to "Sailing". Then I LOL'd irl again. :lol:

April Fools Day ... :wall:

Wiki is living proof of the old adage: "If you say it often enough, and with enough conviction, sooner or later it will become accepted as "the Truth" ..."

but that's the best part of the happy meal :( Well - it's the only truly digestible portion of the Happy Meal, in any event ... :unsure: The toy is what makes a Happy Meal so happy. Without the toy, it's just diarrhea in a box. Ew! LOL! :lol:

Pretty much this The imagery and the fightscenes were phenomenal and the music really went well with the scenes. I enjoyed watching it. But the acting at times was so bad - I laughed. Hard. I'll probably buy it on Blu if it's true it has a total of 20 minutes cut out to make sure it got the PG-13 rating . if I had to compare it - i'd say it's like southland tales or a mix between the awesome of donnie darko and the fail of S Darko. Either way, Must now get autographs of Browning as Baby Doll and Jena Malone as Rocket. Jaime Chung may be the worst actress. EVER I wonder if there will an [immediate] Director's Cut version released when it goes to video? :unsure:

I will wait till they actually set the standings in stone before I make my predictions. Because, if, you know, the Leafs make it to the playoffs, Kessel will be hoisting the Cup this year fo sho! :rolleyes:

but that's the best part of the happy meal :( Well - it's the only truly digestible portion of the Happy Meal, in any event ... :unsure:

Only if you believe that, because a player once got 76 points in one year out of an 18-year career, it makes him an "all-time-great" NHL superstar. If you believe that Nik Antropov is an elite level player, then yes, Sidney Crosby is a mediocre player. Now stop trolling, STFU, and learn a thing or two about hockey before you commence spewing anymore bull[[cabbage]]. :rolleyes:

No, I'm not missing the point at all. The truth is, you have NO WAY of knowing how those draft picks will pan out. Saying they'll be better than Kessel is nothing more than speculative idiocy. Ahh, yes. Wendel Clark, total crap. Let's see. 1993-1994. 46 goals, 30 assists, 76 points, +10. In 64 games played. As a checking winger. Hmm, I wonder who has 46 goals this season in the nhl, after 75 games played. Let's see...how about no one? Bad penalties? Fights? Injuries? Sure. That makes him imperfect, not bad. Trying to purport that Wendel Clark was some time of prolific goal-scoring checker, is like trying to say that Phil Kessel is an elite level hockey player who's production and team value will be better than ALLTHREE (3) top NHL draft picks from 2010/11 who will play for 2/3rds of his salary ... Oh wait. :rolleyes: :lol: Seriously, I can't tell if you're just too biased, or you're just trolling the Leafs line in an effort to hide from the darker reality. You've already indicated that you really don't know much of the team's history that you purport to support. Perhaps you should do some homework before you go off the handle spewing tall tales about someone's alleged "greatness" and team role. When Wendel Clark earned 76 points (not 80) in 1993-94, he was on a line with Doug Gilmour and Dave Andreychuk. That was their scoring line. Wendel wasn't a "checker". Gilmour amassed 111 points that season and Andreychuk had 99, including 53 goals. Hell -- a shaved ape could have played with those two guys and earned 76 points. Oh wait one did. Nevermind. Clark NEVER had that much production in his career before or after that season. Without Gilmour to get the play in motion, and Andreychuk to finish, Clark was nothing more than a shaved ape. With the exception of one season, Clark's annual seasonal output is more in line with any of the other shaved apes on the Leafs' roster of all-time great players like Nik Antropov ... :rolleyes: No. Really. Look it up. Now back on topic +/- 22 I fail to see how it is that you don't understand how bad the Kessel trade was for Toronto. I am not saying that any ONE of the draft picks that Burke tossed off for Kessel will be better than Kessel. I am saying that ALL THREE DRAFT PICKS will be better, ACTING TOGETHER (and perhaps separately) than Phil Kessel. Period. There is no way in hell that Phil Kessel will outmatch the COMBINED production of THREE PLAYERS. This is what Burke tossed away. This is what Leafs fans fail to comprehend. Any THREE PLAYERS are ALWAYS better than ONE player. Especially if that one player is Phil Kessel. Thicky-thicky-thicky- thick-thick ... Leafs fans. :rolleyes:

.. or a reasonably close facsimile thereto. You're missing the point. I think you're doing it deliberately. Leafs fans. :rolleyes: Honestly. Wendel Clark was a piece of [cabbage]. Always was. Always will be. Please show me where he EVER scored 80 points in ONE NHL season -- let alone in more than one. He took bad penalties - made terrible on-ice decisions which resulted in bad penalties and spent more time injured than playing. Total crap! Hello? Is this thing on? Aren't you paying attention?!?!? *tap tap* Helloooooooo? McFly? The Sedin's deal is PRECISELY the kind of move I am saying Burke SHOULD have made instead of picking up Kessel. He had a first round pick and a second round pick. He COULD have traded baggage to Boston for THEIR pick -- and got THREE good, if not great picks. But no, instead, he dumped valuable picks for trash.

Personally - I found the atmosphere, including the stray fish and schools of little fishes, to be very well done. :thumbup:

Well - with the advent of Dungeoneering, "combat" is entirely self-sufficient. :mellow:

:rolleyes:

Gotta love the H2G2 reference. Honestly I am not sure if this is the most enjoyable quest ever, or that it just seems like a great quest because it was so much more enjoyable than all the recent fare. I've always loved the Pirate quest line the jokes, the puns, the quirky humour and the cross-references with pulp culture have always made me laugh out loud during these quests. This new quest was no exception. In any event, it's a quest worth doing. If only for the sheer fun of doing it. It's my new favourite quest. :thumbsup:

I would agree with those restrictions for $20 a month. :thumbup:

No extra bind with this update ... This sucks. <_<

Then stop posting on a RuneScape fansite and take your crap posts elsewhere. :rolleyes: I don't think I've seen anything but you complaining about Jagex for the last few months at least. My goodness but you're so accommodating ... :rolleyes:

I'd be willing to pay $10-$15 a month IF, and only if, Jagex bans the bots ...

LOL -- it's the humour that makes them my favourite quest line ... :lol:

Detroit's last rebuild was 20+ years ago. They've remained competitive without tanking since then. The kings are downright scary? They were barely making the playoffs for the first half of the season....They'll be worrying about cap space pretty quickly as well. Detroit's been building FOR the past 20 years. I've already listed their cup-winning draft picks since Yzerman. ... and yes, thanks for playing the typical Leafs fan "bait and switch" ploy: "Yes, our team is terrible but -- LOOK -- there's OTHER teams that are terrible right now too!!!!" Way to go! Way to ignore the fact that, with the exception of some very few expansion teams, the Leafs have failed to even make it to a single Stanley Cup Final since 1967. Go Leafs! :rolleyes: