ajk822 Posted January 15, 2008 Share Posted January 15, 2008 Hands down P2P can u imagine all the f2p ppl getiing ice barraged. Plus how many truly high lvl f3p accounts are there. Most are pures so yeah, p2p wins and should. 4031st person to 99 Thieving on 5/25/2008If anyone plays NBA Live '08 online on the Wii please PM me. I'm up for anyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foodmanfood1 Posted January 15, 2008 Share Posted January 15, 2008 Are you serious...? -.- Members would win, they have more powerful weapons, more powerful armour, and for the most part, higher leveled players...But my question is why would you ask this, it would never happen...? You know what I'll be somewhere else... :wall: I don't like fun, it upsets me.-- Marilyn Manson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RU_Insane Posted January 15, 2008 Share Posted January 15, 2008 It's like this: 10 lvl 90+ F2P players start charging at Zezima, maxed out. Zezima creates a gust of wind, and all the 10 lvl 90s crash into a tree, and they die. RIP RU_Insane. August 3rd, 2005 - November 11th, 2012. My Stats on Old School RuneScape: Reform Customer SupportCheck Out My Threads Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infernalz Posted January 15, 2008 Share Posted January 15, 2008 F. End of story. Us members have the higher PKing capabilities, access to better food, better weapons, better training to get higher skills, better weapons, barrows, dragon, better spells, better range, know how to survive against a flood of enemy's. Etc. Etc. Etc. Face it, we would win, numbers mean nothing against strength in this case. And that banning of the losers(F2P) is something I've wanted for a long time. ^Click for my Newgrounds page! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theoknight2 Posted January 15, 2008 Share Posted January 15, 2008 why ban the losers? thats [developmentally delayed]ed. No one is going to fight to risk they're account. Then you go on about some moronic things about forfeiting accounts. This is the most stupidest idea EVER. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yomyth105 Posted January 15, 2008 Share Posted January 15, 2008 members will simply own because most r high leveled and they have better equipment. no question here at all. this is a joke. so wat f2p outnumber... 100lvel 3s cant take down a levle 100 cuz they neva gonna be able to hit him/her Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truffoo Posted January 15, 2008 Share Posted January 15, 2008 I foresee a repetition of the last Multi Site Steel War, where members are Tip.it. A few members will die, but really all you'll see is F2P carnage. I find it hard enough to kill a revenant ... I'd have no hope on a member with anything better than rune. WARNING: Prone to ramble ... but you probably already know that!1% F2P : 99% RL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddaanniiellh Posted January 15, 2008 Share Posted January 15, 2008 But theres a difference in sheer numbers, 5mil+ non-members vs, 1 mil members? (Btw, I've beaten level 80s using simply full rune and no member items vs torags and whip) ~Ddaanniiellh : 1437 : 173Lowest Combat to 1,000 Total in F2P (23 Combat)Check me out on YouTube! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kragg3802 Posted January 15, 2008 Share Posted January 15, 2008 A level 126 kills 5 levels 80 without any risk..... Dharoks, emo's ultimate weapon if you know what i'm sayin. :lol:Very nice 10/10For a second when I was looking at your drop-list picture. Ilooked at the dragon longsword and said "They have a dragon longsword now??" ohh I'm tired :wall:..., then I noticed a gravestone where our tank was supposed to be and my health was a 1 digit number again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubbyjoe2 Posted January 16, 2008 Author Share Posted January 16, 2008 A level 126 kills 5 levels 80 without any risk..... Not true. One 30 at a time does not beat 5 18s at a time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonshadow Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 I say G. This isn't too hard. 9 Million people vs 1 million. Who do you think would win? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homer205 Posted January 25, 2008 Share Posted January 25, 2008 2. Members may use their items, spells, skills, and prayers against free players. Ancient Magicks, Dragon weapons, and Barrows armors have NO effect on Free players. However, Barrows weapons, Dragon Armor, and everything else can damage them. This includes Godswords, Whips, and Granite Mauls. This part confuses me, we can use them but they have no effect? And then you go on to say "However, Barrows weapons, Dragon Armor, and everything else can damage them." So it has no effect but we can still damage them with it? Also, dragon armour can't damage people. If we can't use this stuff then other than 8 million people what is the difference? I think you have the banning part to make everybody participate which I understand yet it's a bad consequence, perhaps change it to "everybody magically wants to participate in this war" and skip the bannings. I need you to clarify the first point before I can vote and explain my reasoning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsboutin2 Posted June 20, 2008 Share Posted June 20, 2008 F all the way... We (members) would own with all our potions, whips, godswords, god spells, dark bows, food, summons, etc. And there might be 9 million F2Ps, but how many are mains? And how many still play? Less than 1M, I'd say... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedgehog Posted June 20, 2008 Share Posted June 20, 2008 This is like the spartan-persian battle, 300 spartans pitted against 3 (i think)million of persians. Who won? Both did. The aim for the spartans was to stop the persians, even if it meant dying to do so. They killed so many persians they couldn't take sparta. The persians won because they defeated the spartans that stood up to them. How did the spartans kill so many persians? They had more warriors. The persian army consisted of few warriors, though the ones they had were no match for the spartans. In this metaphor members are the spartans, fewer numbers and more skill. The persians are representative of the free players, lack of fighting skill but have numbers. Members would only be outnumbered 5 to 1, the spartans were out numbered 10000 to 1. No question, f. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hawks Posted June 20, 2008 Share Posted June 20, 2008 G if all the macroers fought F2P would win. sig by Soa.....tip.it times.....art & mediadeviantart/flickr/last.fm/steam/twitter/tumblr/youtube Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsboutin2 Posted June 20, 2008 Share Posted June 20, 2008 G if all the macroers fought F2P would win. 1 million of lvls 3 couldn't kill 1 lvl 138... They wouldn't be able to hit anything except 0s... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSchmedley Posted June 20, 2008 Share Posted June 20, 2008 K Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
max_miller20 Posted June 21, 2008 Share Posted June 21, 2008 The way you represented this is wierd but the idea has been around for a while. G- F2P will win, and I want them to. More than 9 million ftp acount* (probably a lot more now) > more than one million member acount. 8 million people level 60-70 with rune you know would own you. 8-) And how could all the autos fight without breaking the multiple logging in rule? *http://www.gamedaily.com/articles/features/wildtangent-explores-runescape/69187/?biz=1 Does it really matter whether I was right? #-oThis is Tipit. There is nothing more important than being right. Common sense is nothing more than a deposit of prejudices laid down in the mind before you reach eighteen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
max_miller20 Posted June 21, 2008 Share Posted June 21, 2008 G if all the macroers fought F2P would win. 1 million of lvls 3 couldn't kill 1 lvl 138... They wouldn't be able to hit anything except 0s... 10,000 macroers would take 10,000 hits to kill. Even if they only hit one every 1000 hits that them hiting 10 every time the level 138 kills one, equal damage. Does it really matter whether I was right? #-oThis is Tipit. There is nothing more important than being right. Common sense is nothing more than a deposit of prejudices laid down in the mind before you reach eighteen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsboutin2 Posted June 21, 2008 Share Posted June 21, 2008 G if all the macroers fought F2P would win. 1 million of lvls 3 couldn't kill 1 lvl 138... They wouldn't be able to hit anything except 0s... 10,000 macroers would take 10,000 hits to kill. Even if they only hit one every 1000 hits that them hiting 10 every time the level 138 kills one, equal damage. They might have 1/10000 chace to hit, but once dead, they can't revive, but the lvl 138 regenerates. If he summons a steel Titan, it's even worse for the macros. It's like having a goblin attacking Jad... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aruschpler12 Posted June 22, 2008 Share Posted June 22, 2008 The f2p would win and they should. Quantity wins over quality irl. This isn't lord of the rings, even though botters are stupid as orcs. Also, the rule was no attacking teammates. It said nothing about them getting caught in the crossfire (in reference to Ice bursting). 2 million level 3s could kill 100 level 138's simply because the 138 can't hit more than 1 at a time. Simple. F2P RULES! It's called the "Grand Exchange," and not the "Grand Alwaysatyourservicetodoyourbidding,regardlessoftheneedsofothers," for a reason.107,992 to 99 cooking96,545 to 99 fletching24,699 to 99 smithingI would indeed be happy if someone stopped spreading cancer all over this place. Even though it tends to be funny to read, but not as much when someone who demands people to make way for him comes along and decides to call others arrogant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matanui12321 Posted June 23, 2008 Share Posted June 23, 2008 The f2p would win and they should. Quantity wins over quality irl. This isn't lord of the rings, even though botters are stupid as orcs. Also, the rule was no attacking teammates. It said nothing about them getting caught in the crossfire (in reference to Ice bursting). 2 million level 3s could kill 100 level 138's simply because the 138 can't hit more than 1 at a time. Simple. F2P RULES! Two million zeros to a 138. 138 barrages, two million level 3s die quickly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aruschpler12 Posted July 1, 2008 Share Posted July 1, 2008 Tell he how he would kill 2 million noobs quickly? It's called the "Grand Exchange," and not the "Grand Alwaysatyourservicetodoyourbidding,regardlessoftheneedsofothers," for a reason.107,992 to 99 cooking96,545 to 99 fletching24,699 to 99 smithingI would indeed be happy if someone stopped spreading cancer all over this place. Even though it tends to be funny to read, but not as much when someone who demands people to make way for him comes along and decides to call others arrogant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laughattak828 Posted July 2, 2008 Share Posted July 2, 2008 Im f2p and i think p2p would own. They have accces to so much stuff. They could have like 100k of their guys like making supplies at lvl 99 ( i think most lvl 99s are p2p) and the rest out killing and running back to a base for sharks pots etc. The f2p would not have enough skill to do that. The p2pers would quickly demolish the f2p base and find wher tghey were making the food(if they even got the chance) and own. p2p hands down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fairness Posted July 2, 2008 Share Posted July 2, 2008 Either way, Jagex loses. Hi Kaizer. You're from the Fax, right? Nobody would win, everyone would respawn in Lumbridge and would whack each other again and again and again and again and again. Unless a select group of members would stand guard near Lumbridge in every world, which is impossible, in which case members might win. And of course, that means members will cry as some prices will nicely go up with the f2pers no longer massproducing them. So either way, members also lose. You're being watched. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now