Hydraides Posted June 13, 2008 Share Posted June 13, 2008 A Chicago jury has acquitted US singer R Kelly of all 14 charges of child pornography against him. He was found not guilty of making an explicit sex video that prosecutors had said showed him having sex with a girl as young as 13. Mr Kelly, 41, whose real name is Robert Kelly, faced up to 15 years in prison if found guilty. He denied the charges. The singer's hits include She's Got That Vibe and I Believe I Can Fly. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/7454003.stm Thoughts? I thought he was going to be found guilty :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackattack Posted June 13, 2008 Share Posted June 13, 2008 Thats nice. Even with video he can get off. My carbon footprint is bigger than yours...and you know what they say about big feet. These are the times that try mens souls... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hydraides Posted June 13, 2008 Author Share Posted June 13, 2008 Yeah , It is very suprising Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warren211 Posted June 13, 2008 Share Posted June 13, 2008 Meh its because they couldn't find the black mole on the back of the black guy. Not to be racist or anything (really! I hav friends who are black!) but seriously... they couldn't find an already hard to see mole on his back and so they automatically determined it wasn't him. Well that just shows that with a celebrity there's never enough evidence. had it been a random guy off the streets the videos shown would have instantly made the jury agree "yup that's definitely him alright". Just like martha stewart and paris hilton. Get it in your heads, world: celebrities are ABOVE the law. [hide=]tip it would pay me $500.00 to keep my clothes ON :( :lol:But then again, you fail to realize that 101% of the people in this universe hate you. Yes, humankind's hatred against you goes beyond mathematical possibilities.That tears it. I'm starting an animal rebellion using my mind powers. Those PETA bastards will never see it coming until the porcupines are half way up their asses.[/hide]Apparently a lot of people say it. I own. http://linkagg.com/ Not my site, but a simple, budding site that links often unheard-of websites that are amazing for usefulness and fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Will H Posted June 13, 2008 Share Posted June 13, 2008 Apparently the guy in the video didn't have a large mole on the back of his head, unlike Mr Kelly. I don't know what to make of that, how quickly can a mole appear? ~ W ~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InkofDeath Posted June 13, 2008 Share Posted June 13, 2008 Lack of evidence was overwhelming. Same the other way around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
____ Posted June 14, 2008 Share Posted June 14, 2008 Lack of evidence and whitnesses unreliable; no suprise he was acquitted. Happens all the time when those two turn up in a trial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
re4p3r1 Posted June 14, 2008 Share Posted June 14, 2008 this wasnt the first time rkelly had trouble with the law and it wont be the last you can bet on that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chi13 Posted June 14, 2008 Share Posted June 14, 2008 Meh its because they couldn't find the black mole on the back of the black guy. Not to be racist or anything (really! I hav friends who are black!) but seriously... they couldn't find an already hard to see mole on his back and so they automatically determined it wasn't him. Well that just shows that with a celebrity there's never enough evidence. had it been a random guy off the streets the videos shown would have instantly made the jury agree "yup that's definitely him alright". Just like martha stewart and paris hilton. Get it in your heads, world: celebrities are ABOVE the law. I love how everyone who's "not racist" defends themselves by saying they have friends of said race. :lol: Pffft..now we believe you. A REPLACEMENT?Ok picture this, they replace your yew and magic trees with a tree that if you attempt to cut it alone your axe breaks, if you cut it with a group as soon as you get a log you get a skull on your head, all the other woodcutters attack you and you cant log out for 3 minutes.Bounty hunter and tournaments were not a replacement, they are garbage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flodder450 Posted June 14, 2008 Share Posted June 14, 2008 Meh its because they couldn't find the black mole on the back of the black guy. Not to be racist or anything (really! I hav friends who are black!) but seriously... they couldn't find an already hard to see mole on his back and so they automatically determined it wasn't him. Well that just shows that with a celebrity there's never enough evidence. had it been a random guy off the streets the videos shown would have instantly made the jury agree "yup that's definitely him alright". Just like martha stewart and paris hilton. Get it in your heads, world: celebrities are ABOVE the law.Why did michael jackson got prosecuted then? :?: :-s 99 Firemaking 30-5-2010 | 99 Fletching 13-7-2014 TET-AU member:6-10-2010 - 21-10-2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flying_death_bombs55 Posted June 14, 2008 Share Posted June 14, 2008 Meh its because they couldn't find the black mole on the back of the black guy. Not to be racist or anything (really! I hav friends who are black!) but seriously... they couldn't find an already hard to see mole on his back and so they automatically determined it wasn't him. Well that just shows that with a celebrity there's never enough evidence. had it been a random guy off the streets the videos shown would have instantly made the jury agree "yup that's definitely him alright". Just like martha stewart and paris hilton. Get it in your heads, world: celebrities are ABOVE the law.Why did michael jackson got prosecuted then? :?: :-s Because hes a monster When you mentioned the Dragon Plates I had a sudden vision of a load of gangsters running around in fancy dress yealling "Grim Reaper in da hood!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginger_Warrior Posted June 14, 2008 Share Posted June 14, 2008 Meh its because they couldn't find the black mole on the back of the black guy. Not to be racist or anything (really! I hav friends who are black!) Oh please. That's what they all say. If he's been found innocent, then have faith he's innocent. You don't know any better. I like this attitude of 'celebrities always get off the hook', when everyone has the prejudice to assume they're as guilty as sin in the first place without trial. Quite contradictory. :roll: | Favourite Game Music | Last.fm | HYT Friend Chat Rules | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tehravenx Posted June 15, 2008 Share Posted June 15, 2008 Did he urinate on somebody else? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harrington Posted June 16, 2008 Share Posted June 16, 2008 Man, you've gotta love the "Justice System". If you've got money and fame, then you can do whatever the hell you like. It's absolutely true... Hall of Shame * R Kelly (another technicality) * O J Simpson (still promises to find the man that did it lol. Find a mirror... case closed) * Wesley Snipes (anyone else would've been given the full sentence for tax evasion) * Michael Jackson (how many times?!?) * Pete Docherty (been arrested eleven times now) - finally did a whole 17 days in prison! wow! * Amy Winehouse (junkie scum and a bad advert for all would be junkie scum) * Britney Spears (her little tantrum outside the courthouse was hilarious) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichieMcD Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 Meh its because they couldn't find the black mole on the back of the black guy. Not to be racist or anything (really! I hav friends who are black!) but seriously... they couldn't find an already hard to see mole on his back and so they automatically determined it wasn't him. Well that just shows that with a celebrity there's never enough evidence. had it been a random guy off the streets the videos shown would have instantly made the jury agree "yup that's definitely him alright". Just like martha stewart and paris hilton. Get it in your heads, world: celebrities are ABOVE the law.Why did michael jackson got prosecuted then? :?: :-s Because should we really let someone who looks like this roam our streets. He even has the Pedophile smile ffs!! :lol: On-Topic: Yet again another celebrity gets off. Can't wait to see the next case where a celeb gets acquitted :roll: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mischlings Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 CSI: LA. A 44-minute long drama in which a crime is investigated, a celebrity found with incriminating evidence, and then acquitted. In all seriousness, I don't care about the R Kelly case. I didn't follow it and still know next to nothing about it. I still don't have complete faith in our justice system, but it's one of the best the world has. Except it works too slow. (Barry Bonds trial starts MARCH 2009, charges were filed NOVEMBER 2007) If you have ever attempted Alchemy by clapping your hands or by drawing an array, copy and paste this into your signature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichieMcD Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 In all seriousness, I don't care about the R Kelly case. I didn't follow it and still know next to nothing about it. I still don't have complete faith in our justice system, but it's one of the best the world has. The civil rights issues of Guantanamo bay beg to differ ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mischlings Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 In all seriousness, I don't care about the R Kelly case. I didn't follow it and still know next to nothing about it. I still don't have complete faith in our justice system, but it's one of the best the world has. The civil rights issues of Guantanamo bay beg to differ ;) I wasn't referring to that, as I don't even consider that part of our legal system; that seems to be something else entirely. I was referring to the criminal justice system; you know, the thing with juries and judges. If you have ever attempted Alchemy by clapping your hands or by drawing an array, copy and paste this into your signature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now