They obviously could've done a much better job of retouching, but I still think it is a huge overreaction -.-.

 

 

 

And I think the main point they were getting at was that they didn't retouch Palin's Photo much if at all yet they had Obama looking like a god with a halo. But whatever, i don't care and neither should she.

They obviously could've done a much better job of retouching, but I still think it is a huge overreaction -.-.

 

 

 

And I think the main point they were getting at was that they didn't retouch Palin's Photo much if at all yet they had Obama looking like a god with a halo. But whatever, i don't care and neither should she.

 

A Halo, you say? I guess he is a terrorist then if he wants to kill everybody on earth.

They obviously could've done a much better job of retouching, but I still think it is a huge overreaction -.-.

 

 

 

And I think the main point they were getting at was that they didn't retouch Palin's Photo much if at all yet they had Obama looking like a god with a halo. But whatever, i don't care and neither should she.

 

A Halo, you say? I guess he is a terrorist then if he wants to kill everybody on earth.

 

Well not really a halo it's just like...here let me find the pic...

 

 

 

edit:

[hide=]

They obviously could've done a much better job of retouching, but I still think it is a huge overreaction -.-.

 

 

 

And I think the main point they were getting at was that they didn't retouch Palin's Photo much if at all yet they had Obama looking like a god with a halo. But whatever, i don't care and neither should she.

 

A Halo, you say? I guess he is a terrorist then if he wants to kill everybody on earth.

 

Well not really a halo it's just like...here let me find the pic...

 

 

 

edit:

[/hide]looks more like a sunny day at the beach... but whatever the news media says it is goes I guess

Well I tell you what, this image on the front cover way back on January 2007 when Obama launched his campaign in Illinois isn't particularly flattering either (how time flies ):

 

[hide=][/hide]

 

Makes him look well sly, a bit Machiavellian.

They obviously could've done a much better job of retouching, but I still think it is a huge overreaction -.-.

 

 

 

And I think the main point they were getting at was that they didn't retouch Palin's Photo much if at all yet they had Obama looking like a god with a halo. But whatever, i don't care and neither should she.

 

A Halo, you say? I guess he is a terrorist then if he wants to kill everybody on earth.

 

Well not really a halo it's just like...here let me find the pic...

 

 

 

edit:

 

It looks like they overdid the gradient in photoshop...

 

 

 

And i angree with ginger, looks a bit sly in that photo

Palin is annoying. She has no right being the vice president of the United States. Governer of the low populated Alaska to VP of the USA? Think about it. Obama and Biden are the best choice.

Some magazine already did this to McCain but they edited it to make him look worse. I don't think they ran the cover though. It was just a matter of time until the media went after Palin the same way. Not that it really matters anyway.

Hey, if people rhyme Obama with Osama, can I rhyme Palin with Stalin?

Go for it.

Major overreaction in my opinion. Who cares? Clearly "perfect" looks alone aren't going to stop wars and repay America's debt.

 

 

 

Ahaha. I take it you'll be voting for Obama? That's too funny.

Major overreaction in my opinion. Who cares? Clearly "perfect" looks alone aren't going to stop wars and repay America's debt.

 

 

 

Ahaha. I take it you'll be voting for Obama? That's too funny.

 

 

 

Nah, I'm too young to vote and I live in Canada. I'm just saying that as a point. :P

Dunno about the rest of you, but I thought the actual article would've done more damage than the picture on the cover.

 

I guess it's okay if a magazine slams your background, political (in)experience, and ideological stances, but god forbid if they zoom in on your face too much.

Major overreaction in my opinion. Who cares? Clearly "perfect" looks alone aren't going to stop wars and repay America's debt.

 

 

 

Ahaha. I take it you'll be voting for Obama? That's too funny.

 

 

 

Nah, I'm too young to vote and I live in Canada. I'm just saying that as a point. :P

 

 

 

 

 

Oh, I was just saying, people [bleep] about Bush making a huge deficit (war ain't cheap, face it) but Obama's healthcare plan will put us (America ) in huge debt also. ;)

Palin is annoying. She has no right being the vice president of the United States. Governer of the low populated Alaska to VP of the USA? Think about it. Obama and Biden are the best choice.

 

 

 

Funny how you say she doesn't have the right =D> .

[hide=""][/hide]

 

Haha, funny that today in the news some (black) priests were calling him the Messiah. :lol:

lolz, i love in the video when the women on the right says that its an elitest liberal magazine... did i just miss something or is sarah palin not part of the repulibcan party, well known for their elitism?

 

 

 

and honestly who gives a fly [bleep], its a photo, she (obviously) has make up on, the whole point was that she is "foksie" who cares?

lolz, i love in the video when the women on the right says that its an elitest liberal magazine... did i just miss something or is sarah palin not part of the repulibcan party, well known for their elitism?

 

 

 

and honestly who gives a fly [bleep], its a photo, she (obviously) has make up on, the whole point was that she is "foksie" who cares?

 

That is a liberal magazine -.-.

lolz, i love in the video when the women on the right says that its an elitest liberal magazine... did i just miss something or is sarah palin not part of the repulibcan party, well known for their elitism?

 

 

 

and honestly who gives a fly [bleep], its a photo, she (obviously) has make up on, the whole point was that she is "foksie" who cares?

 

That is a liberal magazine -.-.

 

He didn't say it wasn't.

I don't even know why i take my time and answer about a photo.

 

 

 

I think she looks pretty good, and i don't see anything wrong with that photo. And it, making onto the news? Bwahahaaha! I mean, come on... There are more important things to report than a damn photo.

Oh Fox news, you silly little thing, I despise you so much...

 

 

 

Ever notice how the conservative people they bring onto the show are extremely loud, and never listen to the liberal people (who tend to be a lot more rational)?

I can't blame them for trying to make this a big thing, heck if I was not doing as good as the Republican nominees then I would try to make this a big thing too.

 

 

 

@Ginger - I thought that was what he was saying, guess not :

Oh Fox news, you silly little thing, I despise you so much...

 

 

 

Ever notice how the conservative people they bring onto the show are extremely loud, and never listen to the liberal people (who tend to be a lot more rational)?

 

 

 

What do you watch, CNN? :lol: :lol: :lol:

 

 

 

And actually, no one lets anyone speak on Fox News lol. Everyone shouts down everyone else, which happens on other networks.

Oh Fox news, you silly little thing, I despise you so much...

 

 

 

Ever notice how the conservative people they bring onto the show are extremely loud, and never listen to the liberal people (who tend to be a lot more rational)?

 

 

 

Ever watch Msnbc? Exact opposite but worse.

lolz, i love in the video when the women on the right says that its an elitest liberal magazine... did i just miss something or is sarah palin not part of the repulibcan party, well known for their elitism?

 

 

 

and honestly who gives a fly [bleep], its a photo, she (obviously) has make up on, the whole point was that she is "foksie" who cares?

 

 

 

The Republican Party is known for elitism? Is this the same party that is commonly trashed as being full of rednecks?

 

 

 

As for the photo she looks fine. She could have been beaten up and still look hotter than hell.