Or like have a SUPERTWIST and be able to unlock a portable nuclear laser beam.

 

sparten lazer pls :mrgreen:

Why all the hating on CoD:WaW? I've never played any of the others, so I'm probably missing something, but I love this CoD game. If this is the worst one, then I guess the rest are completely awesome.

how about a IW cod for the wii -.-

 

im getting tired of using my thumb tbh

how about a IW cod for the wii -.-

 

im getting tired of using my thumb tbh

 

 

 

Because the Wii isn't optimized for online play. You cant even use proper voice chat. If IW want to push online play as much as they can how can they do it on outdated technology? Frankly I think IW is taking the right approach by ignoring the Wii, and not wasting time and manpower on developing a game which will always be inferior to the other versions.

 

 

 

When you bought a Wii you didn't buy it for serious online gameplay. You bought it for party games and casual play. I know I did.

Why all the hating on CoD:WaW? I've never played any of the others, so I'm probably missing something, but I love this CoD game. If this is the worst one, then I guess the rest are completely awesome.

 

I'm pretty sure they're hating on WaW because CoD 4 was Modern Warfare and the previous ones were all WWII.

 

 

 

I want CoD6 to now take place in 'nam or Korean War. Or WWI.

how about a IW cod for the wii -.-

 

im getting tired of using my thumb tbh

 

 

 

Because the Wii isn't optimized for online play. You cant even use proper voice chat. If IW want to push online play as much as they can how can they do it on outdated technology? Frankly I think IW is taking the right approach by ignoring the Wii, and not wasting time and manpower on developing a game which will always be inferior to the other versions.

 

 

 

When you bought a Wii you didn't buy it for serious online gameplay. You bought it for party games and casual play. I know I did.

 

 

 

 

 

you do make a good point there.

 

brawl here i come :twisted:

 

Same thing with PC gaming I suppose. (the more powuh the beta :D)

Eugh people who say that WW2 is a dried up genre are really starting to get on my boobies. Think of how many games there are that are set in modern times/in the middle east. Probably twice as many as there are in WW2 era. I'm sure someone made a list a while ago but i can't be bothered to look it up.

 

 

 

To be honest I think all FPS's are the same. Theres a bad guy, you go get him, he isnt there, go to another level, and repeat untill the end. Story's almost always the same too. Ironic how the good guys are always portrayed as Americans/British and the bad guys are mostly focused on the middle east, or in some cases, face eating aliens.

 

 

 

I'd like to see a completely new story such as World war 1, trench warfare. I can't think of any games that have touched world war 1. And maybe give us a different point of view. Middle eastern military defending their country from the infadels. Nazis invading france. Something different, something that will be controversial, hated, yet a good game.

 

 

 

Idea for stun nades. Inverse the x and y axis, and if someone plays with them already inverted then uninvert them. Also add a lil slowing down.

Or like have a SUPERTWIST and be able to unlock a portable nuclear laser beam.

 

sparten lazer pls :mrgreen:

 

Or an experimental MIRV :twss:

World War I probably wouldn't be the best game. It'd be tough to make it good, I know that much.

 

 

 

I doubt any modern, established gaming companies will do anything radical that's still fun. They like to play it safe. And the "freelance" companies don't have the strength.

Like I said, altered history war games are the way to go.

They will NEVER do a World War 1 game, all of the guns would suck [wagon], which equals poor gameplay.

They will NEVER do a World War 1 game, all of the guns would suck [wagon], which equals poor gameplay.

 

Reload would be too slow and everybody would just grab their knives and stab everybody. Melee Trench warfare ftw?

 

 

 

Especially in a Civil War/revolution game. :P

After Modern Warfare 2 comes out later this year, I think they should go to the future. Or Vietnam, but future is cooler and allows them to be more creative. Or maybe an alternate WWI scenario, like in Iron Storm.

It should go like 20-30 years in the future. Like the kind of weapons that are being researched and developed now.

Altered history is the way to go IMO. Like if during WWI suddenly a scientist made a stunning discovery which ended trench warfare and makes some very awesome weapons.

COD should be COD, not Resistance, Battlefield 2142, or Halo.

 

 

 

I reckon that Nazi Zombies is as far out as COD will ever go.

Altered history is the way to go IMO. Like if during WWI suddenly a scientist made a stunning discovery which ended trench warfare and makes some very awesome weapons.

 

Red Alert FPS :drool:

Ive heard rumors around teh interwebz that they were developing a multi-time warfare game. Like, your in a modern warfare fight, and you are shot and your familys lifetime passes through your head and you play as your grandfather in WWII and your dad in Vietnam, then you wake up in a military hospital being evac'd and something else afterwards.

 

 

 

I think it sounds really cool.

COD should be COD, not Resistance, Battlefield 2142, or Halo.

 

 

 

I reckon that Nazi Zombies is as far out as COD will ever go.

 

ok then infinity ward/treyarch should make a new war franchise, similar to COD but in future altered history etc. so as not to ruin CODs rep if they flop, good enough

I think it would be a good idea for Treyarch to go out on their own and do a future game or something.

I think airstrikes should come quick but land on a more pinpoint area. Unlike artillery :wall:

Should replace the Airstrike or Chopper with the AC 130 or at least to a realistic balance to the choppers as in real life, the Hind in armoured like a (aerial)tank and can resist much more damage than a Super Cobra so either Hind-Apache or Super Cobra-Havoc

I think airstrikes should come quick but land on a more pinpoint area. Unlike artillery :wall:

 

agreed, i wait for recon plane but by time it comes all the people in that area are dead...

I don't want to see a CoD6 at all. It's way to soon, honestly right now CoD5 is about $50+, CoD4 $40+. People who buy those games have to go through the trouble of getting another one and wasting money.

 

 

 

 

 

If I want to see anything in CoD6 it is:

 

 

 

No buying weapons as said by some, that kills the point of a FPS. FPS != RPG.

 

Less kids.

Er, they've already just about finished developing it. They plan on it coming out late this year, like every other Call of Duty has. One a year.

 

 

 

I heard that it's gonna be another middle eastern Iraq-war-blown-out-of-proportion-thing again.