March 26, 201016 yr Ascension Versus Dragonwood Today, we had a war against DragonWood. We did not prioritize this fight as we have a bigger war coming up, so our pull was slightly below. Anyways, the rules that were agreed on were: [*]CWA Matched Opts[*]Melee/binds/Range ONLY[*]Middle Bounds[*]No Corrupt Allowed[*]No Rings Allowed Startings:Ascension: 16 (Dropped from 19)Dragonwood: 16 The fight has started with us dropping 3 people. Our first pile was a KO while their first pile tanked a little longer. During the fight, Ascension grabbed the upper hand immediately and stayed in control with it.Our binds were great, and our range unit was tremendous. Everyone tanked it out, and eventually the gap grew bigger. At the end of the war, we ended with 7 people and Dragonwood had 1.Good fight Dragonwood, always a pleasure to fight you guys, and hope we can do it again in the future. Once again, GF and wish you guys good luck to your future wars.Respect for DW <3: Ending:Ascension: 7 (1 had to Log out 10 minutes before the end due to irl issue)Dragonwood: 0 Pictures During Fight: Hi I'm Angelo, Proud Founder of Ascension
March 26, 201016 yr Good fight Dragonwood, was fun and clean. Ascension Forums || IRC: #rs-ascension on SwiftIRC || Ascension Memberlist
March 26, 201016 yr Quite surprised that we lost. I guess some of the new members got kod which caused us to lose. Sadly i couldn't make it due to university :( . Gratz on the win Proud Warlord of DragonwoodIf it's natural to kill, how come men have to go into training to learn how? ~ Joan Baez Rest in Peace 3xtermination
March 26, 201016 yr Gratz on the win ASC :thumbup: Shame on HA if he used those trees to hug :thumbdown:
March 26, 201016 yr Ascension members tanked well, some of the DW members didn't.Gratz. As for the SW trees being "out of bounds" - I told you they were in, heres the proof. Thats the section of the same picture used back in the RSC UN when "Center Bounds" and the "Northwest Bounds" (before it was singalised) were organized. EU Leader | | CE Retired Admin | | TKO Retired Member | | SE Retired Member
March 26, 201016 yr Ascension members tanked well, some of the DW members didn't.Gratz. As for the SW trees being "out of bounds" - I told you they were in, heres the proof. Thats the section of the same picture used back in the RSC UN when "Center Bounds" and the "Northwest Bounds" (before it was singalised) were organized. I disagree, tanking those trees makes tanking extremely easy, and hardly anyone does it. If you wish to hug trees then make sure you discuss it with the other clan when getting the war. Just because some fan site dictates what mid bounds are doesn't mean anything. To most general knowledge people consider that out of bounds.
March 26, 201016 yr Ascension members tanked well, some of the DW members didn't.Gratz. As for the SW trees being "out of bounds" - I told you they were in, heres the proof. Thats the section of the same picture used back in the RSC UN when "Center Bounds" and the "Northwest Bounds" (before it was singalised) were organized. I disagree, tanking those trees makes tanking extremely easy, and hardly anyone does it. If you wish to hug trees then make sure you discuss it with the other clan when getting the war. Just because some fan site dictates what mid bounds are doesn't mean anything. To most general knowledge people consider that out of bounds. Considering most if not every clan uses "Center Bounds" which is derived straight from this picture when CWA was introduced, those trees are in bounds unless stated specifically by the rules: "No Trees" - there was no rule that stated this before the fight - so I used them. Yes, tanking them is easy - I'm surprised why more don't use them especially in range fights since they block arrows and hug meleers - RE uses them almost every fight they can and they are arguably one of the best matched ops clans out there because of this - yes because its easy but also because it is technically in bounds and is also very effective. The only reason why most people class it as out of bounds is actually because they don't know its legitimately classed as in. EU Leader | | CE Retired Admin | | TKO Retired Member | | SE Retired Member
March 26, 201016 yr Ascension members tanked well, some of the DW members didn't.Gratz. As for the SW trees being "out of bounds" - I told you they were in, heres the proof. Thats the section of the same picture used back in the RSC UN when "Center Bounds" and the "Northwest Bounds" (before it was singalised) were organized. I disagree, tanking those trees makes tanking extremely easy, and hardly anyone does it. If you wish to hug trees then make sure you discuss it with the other clan when getting the war. Just because some fan site dictates what mid bounds are doesn't mean anything. To most general knowledge people consider that out of bounds. Considering most if not every clan uses "Center Bounds" which is derived straight from this picture when CWA was introduced, those trees are in bounds unless stated specifically by the rules: "No Trees" - there was no rule that stated this before the fight - so I used them. Yes, tanking them is easy - I'm surprised why more don't use them especially in range fights since they block arrows and hug meleers - RE uses them almost every fight they can and they are arguably one of the best matched ops clans out there because of this - yes because its easy but also because it is technically in bounds and is also very effective. The only reason why most people class it as out of bounds is actually because they don't know its legitimately classed as in. I think it's respectable for you to ask for SW Trees to be allowed in instead of getting a fight w/out stating so and then using them when you knnow that no one really legitimately classifies it as in.
March 26, 201016 yr Ascension members tanked well, some of the DW members didn't.Gratz. As for the SW trees being "out of bounds" - I told you they were in, heres the proof. Thats the section of the same picture used back in the RSC UN when "Center Bounds" and the "Northwest Bounds" (before it was singalised) were organized. I disagree, tanking those trees makes tanking extremely easy, and hardly anyone does it. If you wish to hug trees then make sure you discuss it with the other clan when getting the war. Just because some fan site dictates what mid bounds are doesn't mean anything. To most general knowledge people consider that out of bounds. Considering most if not every clan uses "Center Bounds" which is derived straight from this picture when CWA was introduced, those trees are in bounds unless stated specifically by the rules: "No Trees" - there was no rule that stated this before the fight - so I used them. Yes, tanking them is easy - I'm surprised why more don't use them especially in range fights since they block arrows and hug meleers - RE uses them almost every fight they can and they are arguably one of the best matched ops clans out there because of this - yes because its easy but also because it is technically in bounds and is also very effective. The only reason why most people class it as out of bounds is actually because they don't know its legitimately classed as in. I think it's respectable for you to ask for SW Trees to be allowed in instead of getting a fight w/out stating so and then using them when you knnow that no one really legitimately classifies it as in. When I make fights for CE, I do ask; since I can't make wars for DW and no rules are set against trees, I assume that they are in since they are unless told otherwise. EU Leader | | CE Retired Admin | | TKO Retired Member | | SE Retired Member
March 26, 201016 yr Ascension members tanked well, some of the DW members didn't.Gratz. As for the SW trees being "out of bounds" - I told you they were in, heres the proof. Thats the section of the same picture used back in the RSC UN when "Center Bounds" and the "Northwest Bounds" (before it was singalised) were organized. I disagree, tanking those trees makes tanking extremely easy, and hardly anyone does it. If you wish to hug trees then make sure you discuss it with the other clan when getting the war. Just because some fan site dictates what mid bounds are doesn't mean anything. To most general knowledge people consider that out of bounds. Considering most if not every clan uses "Center Bounds" which is derived straight from this picture when CWA was introduced, those trees are in bounds unless stated specifically by the rules: "No Trees" - there was no rule that stated this before the fight - so I used them. Yes, tanking them is easy - I'm surprised why more don't use them especially in range fights since they block arrows and hug meleers - RE uses them almost every fight they can and they are arguably one of the best matched ops clans out there because of this - yes because its easy but also because it is technically in bounds and is also very effective. The only reason why most people class it as out of bounds is actually because they don't know its legitimately classed as in. I think it's respectable for you to ask for SW Trees to be allowed in instead of getting a fight w/out stating so and then using them when you knnow that no one really legitimately classifies it as in. When I make fights for CE, I do ask; since I can't make wars for DW and no rules are set against trees, I assume that they are in since they are unless told otherwise. Well I'm glad CE does that, but when it's not specified it doesn't really give you a right to use it. I've seen plenty of warring rules w/out the rule of ML only, it's almost assumed that hey you're bringing your members only, same thing with the bounds hey most of everyone in the clan world don't include the SW trees.
March 26, 201016 yr Well done Ascension, nevertheless good try Dragonwood. :thumbup: P.S.: I must admit that Dandaman has a point, center bounds for me is from wall to wall and not going past the trees but oh well. 12,079 Profile views. Get on my level.
March 26, 201016 yr gratz asc :thumbup: Forums l Memberlist R.I.P. DVProud to be Leader of Divine Vindicators
March 26, 201016 yr good one ASC ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ~~~Proud Ex-Council of Tempted Killers, There Since Day One~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~No Regrets, Only Memories ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
March 26, 201016 yr I won't lie, I'm surprised. DW used to have a pretty epic Range unit that almost guaranteed them the win. Grats ASC, better luck next time DW. :unsure:
March 26, 201016 yr Congrats Ascension. I have lived my life to the best of my ability, but I have not been able to escape fate, anger, or pain. Bring me the answers, and the road that leads to truth, reveal to me once and for all, how all of this will end.Shadows cannot exist without the light. But without the shadows, the light has no meaning.[Downfall Forums][Downfall YouTube]
March 26, 201016 yr Gratz Ascension :thumbup: Crimson Raiders Forums | Crimson Raiders Runehead | Crimson Raiders FA Runehead§ Crimson Raiders Veteran | Ex Downfall Warlord | Ex Team Vendetta Council
March 27, 201016 yr Congrats, Darkrai was probably the person who get KOed. :P With love to one, friendship to many, and good will to all.
March 27, 201016 yr Thanks for the fight Downfall, Hope to see more in the future :) Great job Asc <3 Proud Owner of #mel
Create an account or sign in to comment