Nero Posted October 26, 2011 Share Posted October 26, 2011 From what I can tell the 'Bot Nuke' went off pretty well, however most of us are noticing large scale desertion of worlds, especially F2P servers. I'm just curious if anyone thinks Jagex will be closing some of the higher numbered worlds so as to consolidate the lowered number of players. It's sort of a taboo thing though, as it has always been one of the first steps taken with a dying game. Thoughts? Opinions? Vienna Raszyn Warsaw Klushino Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Singh Posted October 26, 2011 Share Posted October 26, 2011 Depends on if people are actually using them or not. And also the cost of running those severs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agen Posted October 26, 2011 Share Posted October 26, 2011 From what I can tell the 'Bot Nuke' went off pretty well, however most of us are noticing large scale desertion of worlds, especially F2P servers. I'm just curious if anyone thinks Jagex will be closing some of the higher numbered worlds so as to consolidate the lowered number of players. It's sort of a taboo thing though, as it has always been one of the first steps taken with a dying game. Thoughts? Opinions? I wouldn't be against it. Membership costs are basically what goes towards the server upkeep and if there isn't enough people to fill the servers then close some up and save us money :D. Not likely they'll drop the price though ): Goals for 2012:Quest CapeMAX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brunokiller Posted October 26, 2011 Share Posted October 26, 2011 Yep, all but a few f2p servers are under 100 players, most under 50. I assume there were more bots than we had thought.. My blog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randox Posted October 26, 2011 Share Posted October 26, 2011 Wow, that's super empty. I had no idea that it would be that bad. It is kinda a sign of a dying game though. It would send a really bad signal. I guess it will depend on if things pick up over the next few weeks. I doubt Jagex will make a move to quickly. Having a bunch of 2000 capacity servers with only a couple hundred people would look easily as bad as shutting some of them down. Starting to get an idea of why the marketing team has become so extreme lately. We might need a bit of an infusion of fresh blood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BiJay Posted October 26, 2011 Share Posted October 26, 2011 As I play on the german servers I always wondered why we have 3 F2P worlds as one almost never exceeds 200 players. They didn't get rid of one so maybe they won't as well with the english ones. I wouldn't be mad if they do tough, there would be still enough place for the players. [404] Signature not found. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brunokiller Posted October 26, 2011 Share Posted October 26, 2011 They haven't lost that much anyways. By far all of those bots were f2p (yews, ess etc). P2P worlds haven't changed much except for obvious botting worlds such as lrc and soul wars. They will end up making more money soon with a clean f2p game that encourages paying for membership coupled with reduced server costs if they decide to shut down a few. My blog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NukeMarine Posted October 26, 2011 Share Posted October 26, 2011 Well, assuming they can keep a handle on this botting issue, sounds like a great time to convert some of those member servers into their own isolated group. I've suggested it before, but these servers will let you play your character with fresh stats and bank sort of like when you log onto RSC for the first time. It's still regular RS, but the economy is isolated to only those servers and updates with a two week lag. Might interest people to try their hand on new servers where they're not competing with legacy problems (botted supplies, rares, bugs). Barring things that actually draw in member players, Jagex might try some underhanded tactics to boost revenue. The extra XP for "member recommendation" was obvious though I don't know how it's working. I can imagine them allowing people to essential buy a mule account ie double bank space. Seeing that they have the ability to instance monster areas like Frost Dragons, it's likely they'll even sell higher level membership that grants access to instanced locations instead of competing with regular member accounts. We'll see what the future brings. They bought a lot of good will with recent high level updates and this initial nuke attack, time to see if they can keep it. Learn how to Learn Japanese on your own - Nukemarine's Suggested Guide for Beginners in JapaneseStop Forgetting Stuff for College and Life - Anki - a program which makes remembering things easyReach Elite Fitness - CrossFit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkDude Posted October 26, 2011 Share Posted October 26, 2011 Well, assuming they can keep a handle on this botting issue, sounds like a great time to convert some of those member servers into their own isolated group. I've suggested it before, but these servers will let you play your character with fresh stats and bank sort of like when you log onto RSC for the first time. It's still regular RS, but the economy is isolated to only those servers and updates with a two week lag. Might interest people to try their hand on new servers where they're not competing with legacy problems (botted supplies, rares, bugs). Barring things that actually draw in member players, Jagex might try some underhanded tactics to boost revenue. The extra XP for "member recommendation" was obvious though I don't know how it's working. I can imagine them allowing people to essential buy a mule account ie double bank space. Seeing that they have the ability to instance monster areas like Frost Dragons, it's likely they'll even sell higher level membership that grants access to instanced locations instead of competing with regular member accounts. We'll see what the future brings. They bought a lot of good will with recent high level updates and this initial nuke attack, time to see if they can keep it. I absolutely love this idea and have suggested it before (made a topic about it on here years ago now :P). Would be really really interesting to see the economy grow from scratch. Having a world where things such as sharks would be hard to come by for a long time would just be an interesting dynamic. Would be a lot of "DIY" playing going on especially at the start and would in my opinion bring a whole new feel to the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Will H Posted October 26, 2011 Share Posted October 26, 2011 It's only a sign of a dying game of legitimate players are leaving. What I'm hoping is that Jagex gets a lot of money from court settlements, or even winning court cases, reinvests in the game, then goes for a massive advertising campaign for a 'bot-free' RuneScape. Then, reopen the servers. Profit. ~ W ~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Fray Posted October 26, 2011 Share Posted October 26, 2011 Well the f2p game was decimated by bots up to the point where very few areas were bot free. All the mines were filled with bots, all the trees had bots, essence bots, rc bots, bots at many of the training locations. As bad the bots affected p2p, they hit f2p a lot harder. I am guessing the legit players decided to either become a member or end up quitting as the f2p game was unplayable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J35u5_M4 Posted October 26, 2011 Share Posted October 26, 2011 If we can keep bots off like we are right now, then yes, some servers shutting down would be nice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusk Souls Posted October 26, 2011 Share Posted October 26, 2011 Right now many of the f2p worlds have less than 100 players at the moment... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tngunsmoke Posted October 26, 2011 Share Posted October 26, 2011 Even with the lowered population on most worlds, lag was horrendous last night. Just goes to prove that it wasn't all related to server load. [ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hatebringer Posted October 26, 2011 Share Posted October 26, 2011 Even with the lowered population on most worlds, lag was horrendous last night. Just goes to prove that it wasn't all related to server load. Honestly all the lag has really started with me since the nuke yesterday. I don't know if it was because the required step up to java 1.6 or not, but it has been laggy very much recently to me. And towards the server close, I highly doubt many servers will close if at all, although I do see the f2p servers just amazingly empty and really does make me wonder.. this bot issue was amazingly horrid and alot worse than i thought if more than 80% of f2p were bots and stopped playing thats just too much. 99 Fletching 99 Attack 99 Constitution 99 Cooking 99 StrengthGamertag: H8tebringer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Excels Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 Theory: Due to clusterflutterer's approach of holding a reference to every single object, it torpedoes effective memory management by Java. RS now must explicitly nullify object references. This confuses the garbage collection algorithms Java uses, forcing it to resort to the old graph-tracing Stop the World garbage collections. I really hate the fact I can't get on rs reliably atm. Not only can't I invest in the market, but I can't do some self-learning by having my JVM print out advanced GC info :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 We will have to wait at least a month, depending on how the Jagex rents the servers, for the contract to expire. I would expect to see some consolidation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nero Posted November 2, 2011 Author Share Posted November 2, 2011 Yup, server 'consolidations'. Hi all, Now that the dust has settled from breaking the bots, weve taken the opportunity to re-organise the RuneScape game worlds to ensure a better spread of the playing population. Breaking the bots caused an expected drop in free-playing activity due to millions of gold farmers no longer being in the game, so we have removed a number of free game worlds. While we were at it, we also made a smaller amount of changes to the member worlds, which will make grouping for popular ingame activities as easy as possible. Additionally, those of you in Denmark, Finland, Lithuania, Spain, Norway, Poland and Sweden may notice that free-to-play worlds previously specific to your countries have been consolidated in to new, European worlds. Those of you previously making your homes on those worlds will still have a place to play, as well as the chance to interact more easily with other communities from across Europe. Rest assured that weve carefully considered the number and location of the servers which are no longer being used, so you shouldnt notice any increased server-side lag or difficulties logging in at peak times. Theres plenty of room for everyone to log on, with space to spare for new players too. If you have any questions about this, please visit our technical forums, or submit a technical query. The RuneScape Team Vienna Raszyn Warsaw Klushino Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sly_Wizard Posted November 2, 2011 Share Posted November 2, 2011 I'm mad. Jagex converted W98 into a f2p server. <_< Why? F2p doesn't need any more worlds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gems Posted November 2, 2011 Share Posted November 2, 2011 I'm mad. Jagex converted W98 into a f2p server. <_< Why? F2p doesn't need any more worlds. F2p does need a rated clan wars world though. But why make 105 from f2p to p2p and 98 from p2p to f2p? Couldnt they have moved rated clan wars to be 105 and made 98 the p2p finland world? I created a new account following the tip it hack thing as I was unable to retrieve my old account due to it being registered with an email address that ceased to exist in 2007. My previous username was Amethyst Gem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 hahaha nero well said, or was that what Jagex actually stated? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nero Posted November 3, 2011 Author Share Posted November 3, 2011 hahaha nero well said, or was that what Jagex actually stated?It was a JMod quote from the forums. Vienna Raszyn Warsaw Klushino Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krampell Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 I'm mad. Jagex converted W98 into a f2p server. <_< Why? F2p doesn't need any more worlds.Be happy they didn't make world 99 f2p :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saradomin_Mage Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 Worlds 60 and 71 becoming f2p worlds. OH THE HORROR! Bad enough that they already took 144 down :P In real life MMO you don't get 99 smithing by making endless bronze daggers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaida23 Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 I wonder if merging/removing/reassigning these worlds had contributed to all the login problems we were having. I had left my character on a world that no longer exists and couldn't log in past the lobby until the fix last night. Was she lost in some unknowable limbo tormented by the angry spirits of banned players, bots and forgotten accounts? :ohnoes: No wonder everything I tried to do was so laggy, poor Kaida has been psychologically scarred and will need years of therapy. :lol: Check out my blog to read the Adventures of a Big Damn (F2P) Hero. THE place for all free players to connect, hang out and talk about how awesome it is to be F2P. So, Kaida is the real version of every fictional science-badass? That explains a lot, actually... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now