I hate Global Warming!

[jemathonical]

I dunno if this is global warming but climate change is happening.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This Xmas, in Victoria, it snowed!

 

 

 

That usually doesn't happen in summer

[Fadfdfd]

 

Global Warming = Increase in 1 or 2 degrees over the course of a 50 year span.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1-2 Degrees is alot though :shock: Last Ice Asg was just -4 from what the average temperature is today I heard.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You're correct about that first statement. Don't know about the second and last one though.

[Metroid]

We havn't had snow here in 2-3 years.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We used to get snow every year for 2-3 weeks.. now, just nothing. It's actually been hot sometimes.. when it's suppose to snow! -.-

[Giordano]

This year's weather is due to El Nino. While you people that experience snow during winter are getting warmer weather, here in Southern California its supposed to be 70+ during the winter but its not. Its been 40 in the early moring and highest it went was probably 65 in the afternoon. Also the last 2 days we had heavy winds...

[supermonk]

By the time the next ice age comes and kills us all, I don't think global warming would've done much by then.

[KnightLite]

 

I thought for sure somebody in this liberally-dominated board would've blamed President Bush for all this :shock:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Not sarcastic] I hate to be liberal, but in theory, he is the one with his idea 'Global warming is just a theory'... Although, China is also to blame for their huge economic growth, and mass Co2 emits... I did an extensive report on Global Warming for school, and China and America together are responsible to nearly 33% of all global warming... They're also in denial of the problem as much as eachother...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Luckily, the Uk and EU have finally woken up to the problems we will face due to your pollution, but without the support of China and America, its to little to late... [Not sarcastic/]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

So China and the United States together are 33% responsible for the average temperature rising less than 1 degree Farenhiet every 100 years

[lawrencekill]

 

 

I thought for sure somebody in this liberally-dominated board would've blamed President Bush for all this :shock:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Not sarcastic] I hate to be liberal, but in theory, he is the one with his idea 'Global warming is just a theory'... Although, China is also to blame for their huge economic growth, and mass Co2 emits... I did an extensive report on Global Warming for school, and China and America together are responsible to nearly 33% of all global warming... They're also in denial of the problem as much as eachother...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Luckily, the Uk and EU have finally woken up to the problems we will face due to your pollution, but without the support of China and America, its to little to late... [Not sarcastic/]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

So China and the United States together are responsible for the average temperature rising less than 1 degree Farenhiet ever 100 years

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You mean a third of that less than 1 degree F.

[unknownmasterofnothing]

China really has no regard for air pollution, some of their cities are really messed up. Hard to breathe :-X

[Gin_and_Tonic]

 

 

I thought for sure somebody in this liberally-dominated board would've blamed President Bush for all this :shock:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Not sarcastic] I hate to be liberal, but in theory, he is the one with his idea 'Global warming is just a theory'... Although, China is also to blame for their huge economic growth, and mass Co2 emits... I did an extensive report on Global Warming for school, and China and America together are responsible to nearly 33% of all global warming... They're also in denial of the problem as much as eachother...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Luckily, the Uk and EU have finally woken up to the problems we will face due to your pollution, but without the support of China and America, its to little to late... [Not sarcastic/]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

So China and the United States together are 33% responsible for the average temperature rising less than 1 degree Farenhiet every 100 years

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No, they're responsible for the increase in water depth, the extinction of artic animals, the shrinking of the polar ice cape, the toxic rain, the hot summers, the cold, snowless winters, the billions of pounds which has been put into research for climate change and how to combat it... and the future... which is'nt looking good -.-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Use logic here, i know you may find it hard... If America 'just' increased temperature by 1F in the last 100years, tell me why the nation is so paranoid global warming will be the end of us?... Tell me that... Why waste billions of pounds into research, which from what i hear, its very trivial in the matter?

[sparticus348]

Just another example:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On Saturday, Janurary 6th, (2007) here in New Jersey we had 70 degree weather - nice enough for shorts - it was a record, last time it happened - 66 in 1950 (56/57 years ago)

[honeo]

Global warming is fake. Man, I love the South Park episode "Manbearpig". Al Gore is a freak!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Global warming is fake? Show me where you have come upon this interesting fact :roll: . Al Gore is a freak because he believes that Global Warming exists. Right. Show me some proof that Global Warming does not exist please.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

k, ty

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Also, I have seen proof that an El Nino is causing the weather patterns and not Global Warming.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On another note. The temperatures around here have dropped to 30 degrees or below. This is very good. I hear this week or next week we are supposed to start getting more snow. This is very good news. =D>

[eias]

This may sound "nerdy" or "rediculous", but this is how I really feel. The main reason I hate Global Warming? No snow to go snowboarding on!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intro:

 

 

 

I live in the mid-west. We have always had cold, snowy winters, every year. 4/5 christmas's we would have snow on the ground. But this year? We had 50 degrees with thunder storms :/. It is January 5th. I had a break on the job today and I actually had to roll up my sleeves (when I was outside!) because I was hot. I was just sitting down eating chips too, so no hard labor. We had one 1 1/2 foot snow on December 5th? I forget. But the rest of the winter has been 40 degree weather with rain! This is outragous. I love snowboarding... How can I snowboard without snow.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Problem:

 

 

 

Of course. Global Warming is not good, eventually, it is supposed to cause major flooding due to the melting of ice caps. There are more CO2 emisions being trapped in earths atmosphere. Not a good situation. The guise(sp?) still havnt migrated south yet! They are still flocking behind my house. This is a MAJOR problem. Ice caps are breaking off. Recently, an ice cap the size of 14 football fields broke off. It is supposidly floating in the ocean and may float in the way of shipping paths, making it a huge problem.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conclusion:

 

 

 

I really just want to go snowboarding. Me and my buds go snowboarding every winter break, this is the first winter break we didn't go. The reason was, it did not snow. ONCE. I blame Global Warming, as it is rising Global Temperatures and making it less likely to snow.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-Honeo

 

 

 

lucky you go snowboarding once or more

 

 

 

here 1/5 years only have snow on ground

 

 

 

no places to snowboard unless in a really good mountin in the furthest north

[Antrune]

Its a myth.

[michiel2]

Its a myth.

 

 

 

Explain.

[Tigra00]

I like how scientists say something, basing the claims on data, and people will think of anything to say it is false. Like they're somehow out to disprove scientists so they can feel special.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here's a hint, guys:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scientists are scientists for a reason. They're smarter than you.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This alone makes anyone who ISN'T a scientist sound stupid when they claim something against what a scientist says.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It would have to be a HUGE coincidence if the world getting warmer had NOTHING to do with our usage of oil. Considering that burnning oil directly increases Co2 levels in the atmosphere, and Co2 traps heat inside the Earth...I really have no idea how anyone can say "It's a MYTH!!!1". That is just beyond stupid. In defies logic to even say that. Logically, humans causing the Earth to get warmer via burning oil is an extremely simple concept to understand. It isn't a theory that Co2 is pushed into the air via burning oil, and it isn't a theory that Co2 traps heat inside the Earth, so why the hell is Global Warming considered a theory by some? Honestly now. Like I said - That defies logic and goes straight to stupid.

[Gin_and_Tonic]

I like how scientists say something, basing the claims on data, and people will think of anything to say it is false. Like they're somehow out to disprove scientists so they can feel special.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here's a hint, guys:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scientists are scientists for a reason. They're smarter than you.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This alone makes anyone who ISN'T a scientist sound stupid when they claim something against what a scientist says.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It would have to be a HUGE coincidence if the world getting warmer had NOTHING to do with our usage of oil. Considering that burnning oil directly increases Co2 levels in the atmosphere, and Co2 traps heat inside the Earth...I really have no idea how anyone can say "It's a MYTH!!!1". That is just beyond stupid. In defies logic to even say that. Logically, humans causing the Earth to get warmer via burning oil is an extremely simple concept to understand. It isn't a theory that Co2 is pushed into the air via burning oil, and it isn't a theory that Co2 traps heat inside the Earth, so why the hell is Global Warming considered a theory by some? Honestly now. Like I said - That defies logic and goes straight to stupid.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As you can probably tell, defying logical seems to be very frequent in Off-topic...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Its a myth

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Not just spam, but also, possible, the most thickest thing i have seen on Tip-It to date... Denying the evidence is one thing, but claiming its a mith, is like actually meeting God and still denying his existance...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Just another example:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On Saturday, Janurary 6th, (2007) here in New Jersey we had 70 degree weather - nice enough for shorts - it was a record, last time it happened - 66 in 1950 (56/57 years ago)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thats not a result of Global Warming now is it? [sarcasm/] :-w

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It went from absouloutely hammering it down, to actually being Sunny today - This time, 10000 Years ago, we'd be pasted in snow...

[ktmcf121]

I like how scientists say something, basing the claims on data, and people will think of anything to say it is false. Like they're somehow out to disprove scientists so they can feel special.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here's a hint, guys:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scientists are scientists for a reason. They're smarter than you.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This alone makes anyone who ISN'T a scientist sound stupid when they claim something against what a scientist says.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It would have to be a HUGE coincidence if the world getting warmer had NOTHING to do with our usage of oil. Considering that burnning oil directly increases Co2 levels in the atmosphere, and Co2 traps heat inside the Earth...I really have no idea how anyone can say "It's a MYTH!!!1". That is just beyond stupid. In defies logic to even say that. Logically, humans causing the Earth to get warmer via burning oil is an extremely simple concept to understand. It isn't a theory that Co2 is pushed into the air via burning oil, and it isn't a theory that Co2 traps heat inside the Earth, so why the hell is Global Warming considered a theory by some? Honestly now. Like I said - That defies logic and goes straight to stupid.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

here's another hint:

 

 

 

scientists don't research and use give thier knowledge away for free. who do you think pays them?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

thats right, they are being paid by people with political intrests. conservative parties pay scientists big money to invest all thier time and research into proving that global warming doesnt exist, and liberal parties pay different scientists to prove that the opposite is true.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

now the fact that global emissions exist is impossible to deny. but the theory that these "bad" emissions are the sole cause of the warming of the earth is just that, a theory. look at the history of the earth, even before mankind existed, the earth went through several temperature cycles, there have been several ice ages as well as several periods of warmth.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

i love how people think that just because al gore made a movie, he is an expert on anything. he's still just a lowlife politician.

[Tigra00]

 

I like how scientists say something, basing the claims on data, and people will think of anything to say it is false. Like they're somehow out to disprove scientists so they can feel special.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here's a hint, guys:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scientists are scientists for a reason. They're smarter than you.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This alone makes anyone who ISN'T a scientist sound stupid when they claim something against what a scientist says.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It would have to be a HUGE coincidence if the world getting warmer had NOTHING to do with our usage of oil. Considering that burnning oil directly increases Co2 levels in the atmosphere, and Co2 traps heat inside the Earth...I really have no idea how anyone can say "It's a MYTH!!!1". That is just beyond stupid. In defies logic to even say that. Logically, humans causing the Earth to get warmer via burning oil is an extremely simple concept to understand. It isn't a theory that Co2 is pushed into the air via burning oil, and it isn't a theory that Co2 traps heat inside the Earth, so why the hell is Global Warming considered a theory by some? Honestly now. Like I said - That defies logic and goes straight to stupid.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

here's another hint:

 

 

 

scientists don't research and use give thier knowledge away for free. who do you think pays them?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

thats right, they are being paid by people with political intrests. conservative parties pay scientists big money to invest all thier time and research into proving that global warming doesnt exist, and liberal parties pay different scientists to prove that the opposite is true.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

now the fact that global emissions exist is impossible to deny. but the theory that these "bad" emissions are the sole cause of the warming of the earth is just that, a theory. look at the history of the earth, even before mankind existed, the earth went through several temperature cycles, there have been several ice ages as well as several periods of warmth.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

i love how people think that just because al gore made a movie, he is an expert on anything. he's still just a lowlife politician.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I've never seen Al Gore's movie and I don't really care about it. Tell me: What does someone have to gain by spreading the truth about Co2 out-put being bad for Earth? Oil companies can't sell oil anymore? And? Then what? It's not like Al Gore is a Hydrogen Technology tycoon paying off these scientists.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It's pretty simple. If you know anything about science, you can make the connections and say our oil consumption is surely hurting the world. It's getting so much attention because all the ice-caps in the world are freakin' disappearing completely. We've never had this happen before in recorded history, and using simple logic, it's obviously our fault. Does Earth naturally go through this process? Yes, but we're also helping induce it very greatly. Like I said - simple logic. Co2 = heat trapped inside the Earth. When we pump a billion metric tons of Co2 into sky on a daily basis, we can't really just say "Isn't our fault!" now can we?

[Gin_and_Tonic]

Scientists aren't going to lie about Climate Change now are they? -.-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Of course someone will quote me and say 'Yes', as they're clearly to intelligent for me :roll:

[Nadril]

Thats not a result of Global Warming now is it? [sarcasm/]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aside from you messing up the sarcasm tag, your right its not. Thats the cause of El Nino.

[warri0r45]

 

 

I like how scientists say something, basing the claims on data, and people will think of anything to say it is false. Like they're somehow out to disprove scientists so they can feel special.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here's a hint, guys:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scientists are scientists for a reason. They're smarter than you.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This alone makes anyone who ISN'T a scientist sound stupid when they claim something against what a scientist says.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It would have to be a HUGE coincidence if the world getting warmer had NOTHING to do with our usage of oil. Considering that burnning oil directly increases Co2 levels in the atmosphere, and Co2 traps heat inside the Earth...I really have no idea how anyone can say "It's a MYTH!!!1". That is just beyond stupid. In defies logic to even say that. Logically, humans causing the Earth to get warmer via burning oil is an extremely simple concept to understand. It isn't a theory that Co2 is pushed into the air via burning oil, and it isn't a theory that Co2 traps heat inside the Earth, so why the hell is Global Warming considered a theory by some? Honestly now. Like I said - That defies logic and goes straight to stupid.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

here's another hint:

 

 

 

scientists don't research and use give thier knowledge away for free. who do you think pays them?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

thats right, they are being paid by people with political intrests. conservative parties pay scientists big money to invest all thier time and research into proving that global warming doesnt exist, and liberal parties pay different scientists to prove that the opposite is true.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

now the fact that global emissions exist is impossible to deny. but the theory that these "bad" emissions are the sole cause of the warming of the earth is just that, a theory. look at the history of the earth, even before mankind existed, the earth went through several temperature cycles, there have been several ice ages as well as several periods of warmth.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

i love how people think that just because al gore made a movie, he is an expert on anything. he's still just a lowlife politician.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I've never seen Al Gore's movie and I don't really care about it. Tell me: What does someone have to gain by spreading the truth about Co2 out-put being bad for Earth? Oil companies can't sell oil anymore? And? Then what? It's not like Al Gore is a Hydrogen Technology tycoon paying off these scientists.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It's pretty simple. If you know anything about science, you can make the connections and say our oil consumption is surely hurting the world. It's getting so much attention because all the ice-caps in the world are freakin' disappearing completely. We've never had this happen before in recorded history, and using simple logic, it's obviously our fault. Does Earth naturally go through this process? Yes, but we're also helping induce it very greatly. Like I said - simple logic. Co2 = heat trapped inside the Earth. When we pump a billion metric tons of Co2 into sky on a daily basis, we can't really just say "Isn't our fault!" now can we?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I agree with tigra on both accounts. As for those doubters out there -

 

 

 

A website even kids could understand.

 

 

 

Theres even a link to all sorts of games, try the climate change knowlege test. I scored 10/10 :wink: :lol:

[ktmcf121]

oh, dont even get me started on the freaking EPA.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

between them and PETA, there's enough liberal propaganda to make me sick for years.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

:-X

[yomom1919]

Here in jersey its like... 45-55 degrees.

 

 

 

thats some major global warming.

[honeo]

 

 

 

I like how scientists say something, basing the claims on data, and people will think of anything to say it is false. Like they're somehow out to disprove scientists so they can feel special.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here's a hint, guys:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scientists are scientists for a reason. They're smarter than you.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This alone makes anyone who ISN'T a scientist sound stupid when they claim something against what a scientist says.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It would have to be a HUGE coincidence if the world getting warmer had NOTHING to do with our usage of oil. Considering that burnning oil directly increases Co2 levels in the atmosphere, and Co2 traps heat inside the Earth...I really have no idea how anyone can say "It's a MYTH!!!1". That is just beyond stupid. In defies logic to even say that. Logically, humans causing the Earth to get warmer via burning oil is an extremely simple concept to understand. It isn't a theory that Co2 is pushed into the air via burning oil, and it isn't a theory that Co2 traps heat inside the Earth, so why the hell is Global Warming considered a theory by some? Honestly now. Like I said - That defies logic and goes straight to stupid.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

here's another hint:

 

 

 

scientists don't research and use give thier knowledge away for free. who do you think pays them?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

thats right, they are being paid by people with political intrests. conservative parties pay scientists big money to invest all thier time and research into proving that global warming doesnt exist, and liberal parties pay different scientists to prove that the opposite is true.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

now the fact that global emissions exist is impossible to deny. but the theory that these "bad" emissions are the sole cause of the warming of the earth is just that, a theory. look at the history of the earth, even before mankind existed, the earth went through several temperature cycles, there have been several ice ages as well as several periods of warmth.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

i love how people think that just because al gore made a movie, he is an expert on anything. he's still just a lowlife politician.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I've never seen Al Gore's movie and I don't really care about it. Tell me: What does someone have to gain by spreading the truth about Co2 out-put being bad for Earth? Oil companies can't sell oil anymore? And? Then what? It's not like Al Gore is a Hydrogen Technology tycoon paying off these scientists.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It's pretty simple. If you know anything about science, you can make the connections and say our oil consumption is surely hurting the world. It's getting so much attention because all the ice-caps in the world are freakin' disappearing completely. We've never had this happen before in recorded history, and using simple logic, it's obviously our fault. Does Earth naturally go through this process? Yes, but we're also helping induce it very greatly. Like I said - simple logic. Co2 = heat trapped inside the Earth. When we pump a billion metric tons of Co2 into sky on a daily basis, we can't really just say "Isn't our fault!" now can we?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I agree with tigra on both accounts. As for those doubters out there -

 

 

 

A website even kids could understand.

 

 

 

Theres even a link to all sorts of games, try the climate change knowlege test. I scored 10/10 :wink: :lol:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Let's just wait 50 years and see who's actually right.

[Gin_and_Tonic]

Let's just wait 50 years and see who's actually right.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I seriously doubt it will be that long... It would be nice to see this thread last 50 years though. :-k