Dravenstormn Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 After being away from RS for so long now and reading alot of this topic brings me to the fact ALOT of people don't know what they are talkin about when it comes to who was strongest or whatnot. BDK was strong cause I would say 70-80% of thier members were cheaters. Take a look at the BDK memberlist and where are those people now? BANNED for some various cheats. RH2 banned , Sunjon banned , WDB( also known as P O K E Y after WDB was banned ) Zar Family banned , Nitestalker8 banned. So would you actually consider them strong yes , due to being able to macro , bug abuse , and use AC progz. Clans like Wanderers who were the ELITE of ELITE for thier time , RSD ( old classic RSD not this BS people call RSD now ) , Gladz , Sabres , and many others all had thier dominance and time in the spotlight for it. Gladz , 'THE' , Sabres had the early advantage of being pre-formed clans in other games comming to RS and leveling fast and gaining alot of early power. RSD I built and our numbers and lvls outdid anyone in our time. We had the strongest rangers , mages and some of the strongest melee fighters in the game. DI well they had power due to other clans falling apart and gaining thier members. classic DI was thier best. In this new RS DI has power of time and people falling apart. The clan system , and wilderness now doesn't show what clan has more power it is all a numbers game. Who has more people show up is where your outcome lies. Not in skill. Started January 2001 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
00 Quanta Posted April 17, 2007 Author Share Posted April 17, 2007 Gladz still show their strength these days since they are still the top 10 clans. Di was strong because they had members who were in Wanderers and BDK. Those who were never in them still knew how to pk well enough in RsC After RSD fell in 2004, Di just rose up gaining members from 10 or 20% of RSD even though most were declined while only a few made it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
123Yourgone Posted April 17, 2007 Share Posted April 17, 2007 Nitestalker8 banned.No he isnt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warpedthunder Posted April 17, 2007 Share Posted April 17, 2007 The clan system , and wilderness now doesn't show what clan has more power it is all a numbers game. Who has more people show up is where your outcome lies. Not in skill. Not true, id give examples and numbers but lets take the classic one. DS outnumbered on lots of occasions won Adelais VS Tunescape? Adelais massively outnumbered but yet still truimph Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celebi Posted April 25, 2007 Share Posted April 25, 2007 DI, that's my opinion. But, look at the clan list here, (Sorted by average combat level ) Finland has two clans at top 10 :D FOOLS at the place 9th place with avg cb 121.94 and 124 members, and Luminary ate place 8 with 35 members and 122.22 average combat. :D Don't say anything about how many clans US has at the top... That's obvious that they have all the best clans, but, Finland is a small country with many many times less people and RS players. Do you even know where finland is? :roll: FormerTip.It mapper | hello? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
00 Quanta Posted April 26, 2007 Author Share Posted April 26, 2007 DI, that's my opinion. But, look at the clan list here, (Sorted by average combat level ) Finland has two clans at top 10 :D FOOLS at the place 9th place with avg cb 121.94 and 124 members, and Luminary ate place 8 with 35 members and 122.22 average combat. :D Don't say anything about how many clans US has at the top... That's obvious that they have all the best clans, but, Finland is a small country with many many times less people and RS players. Do you even know where finland is? :roll: it doesn't matter by combat average it matters by how good they've been in pking and wars Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warpedthunder Posted April 26, 2007 Share Posted April 26, 2007 DI, that's my opinion. But, look at the clan list here, (Sorted by average combat level ) Finland has two clans at top 10 :D FOOLS at the place 9th place with avg cb 121.94 and 124 members, and Luminary ate place 8 with 35 members and 122.22 average combat. :D Don't say anything about how many clans US has at the top... That's obvious that they have all the best clans, but, Finland is a small country with many many times less people and RS players. Do you even know where finland is? :roll: it doesn't matter by combat average it matters by how good they've been in pking and wars let me point out that yes FOOLS might have a good memberlist and all but do you have any idea what their clan is made up of? why do you think they are not a top 30 even 50 clan. Ill let you figure that one out yourself seen as how your so smart, also im quoting what the guy above me said becuase i agree with him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonny_w Posted May 2, 2007 Share Posted May 2, 2007 wanderers, bdk, rsd. not di that's for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
00 Quanta Posted May 2, 2007 Author Share Posted May 2, 2007 wanderers, bdk, rsd. not di that's for sure. you're going to put RSD but not Di? wow......thats stupid You don't see any other clan dominating F2P and P2P for over 2 years like Di Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
123Yourgone Posted May 2, 2007 Share Posted May 2, 2007 wanderers, bdk, rsd. not di that's for sure. you're going to put RSD but not Di? wow......thats stupid You don't see any other clan dominating F2P and P2P for over 2 years like Di RSD did it when it was hard, di did it with a load of old rsd, like natra, bahamzero, bubbles30, after rsd had died and left di with no competition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reaper88888 Posted May 4, 2007 Share Posted May 4, 2007 DI. There is no meaning or truth in life but that which we create for ourselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheWilch Posted May 5, 2007 Share Posted May 5, 2007 well it looks like di takes the cake. now ... which clan has had the most impressive reputation while being in the spotlight (any point in time for any amount of time) ... ya they take the cake on that 1 too. or rsd/the btw. om s are u in a clan? if so which one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
00 Quanta Posted May 5, 2007 Author Share Posted May 5, 2007 btw. om s are u in a clan? if so which one. none...I go on and off once or twice a week. Too busy with work so I have no time for Rs basicly... :? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiddofwis Posted May 5, 2007 Share Posted May 5, 2007 Sabres , Bdk, Rune Mob, RSD , DI , DS In that order. Most Dominant clan from classic. BDK Most dominant clan from RS2. Ds Why Ds and not DI ? Simply cause Ds grew from nothing , they didnt have massive ammount of numbers come to them from the undisputed #1 clan to help them. If any of you remember , DI was [cabbage] before RSD closed. They were nobodys. Its why they got their [wagon] handed to them in less then 15 mins in a official war with RSD. After RSD closed many members had no wheres to go except DI which opened their arms for them to help boost their member count. Yea DI dominated blahdy blah , but they did it during a time when the next best clans average combat was 103 ish to their 115ish (not exact figures but you get the idea). As soon as a clan came up that was equal to them what happened? They lost ...and got owned repeatedly on f2p . Di has dominated MB on p2p , not p2p entirely. Theyve always left that to the rest of the clans that pked p2p like WG. Yes once in a while they do multi pk , but they are usually found at mb and mb only. Mb doesnt prove your clan is dominant , it proves you got more members from your clan pking. Meeturpker99 hp before you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
00 Quanta Posted May 5, 2007 Author Share Posted May 5, 2007 Sabres , Bdk, Rune Mob, RSD , DI , DS In that order. Most Dominant clan from classic. BDK Most dominant clan from RS2. Ds Why Ds and not DI ? Simply cause Ds grew from nothing , they didnt have massive ammount of numbers come to them from the undisputed #1 clan to help them. If any of you remember , DI was [cabbage] before RSD closed. They were nobodys. Its why they got their [wagon] handed to them in less then 15 mins in a official war with RSD. After RSD closed many members had no wheres to go except DI which opened their arms for them to help boost their member count. Yea DI dominated blahdy blah , but they did it during a time when the next best clans average combat was 103 ish to their 115ish (not exact figures but you get the idea). As soon as a clan came up that was equal to them what happened? They lost ...and got owned repeatedly on f2p . Di has dominated MB on p2p , not p2p entirely. Theyve always left that to the rest of the clans that pked p2p like WG. Yes once in a while they do multi pk , but they are usually found at mb and mb only. Mb doesnt prove your clan is dominant , it proves you got more members from your clan pking. b4 MB it was always p2p multi, p2p multi was popular in the beginning of rs2...Di did most their pking in p2p, same with Devils and ZF.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiddofwis Posted May 6, 2007 Share Posted May 6, 2007 Sabres , Bdk, Rune Mob, RSD , DI , DS In that order. Most Dominant clan from classic. BDK Most dominant clan from RS2. Ds Why Ds and not DI ? Simply cause Ds grew from nothing , they didnt have massive ammount of numbers come to them from the undisputed #1 clan to help them. If any of you remember , DI was [cabbage] before RSD closed. They were nobodys. Its why they got their [wagon] handed to them in less then 15 mins in a official war with RSD. After RSD closed many members had no wheres to go except DI which opened their arms for them to help boost their member count. Yea DI dominated blahdy blah , but they did it during a time when the next best clans average combat was 103 ish to their 115ish (not exact figures but you get the idea). As soon as a clan came up that was equal to them what happened? They lost ...and got owned repeatedly on f2p . Di has dominated MB on p2p , not p2p entirely. Theyve always left that to the rest of the clans that pked p2p like WG. Yes once in a while they do multi pk , but they are usually found at mb and mb only. Mb doesnt prove your clan is dominant , it proves you got more members from your clan pking. b4 MB it was always p2p multi, p2p multi was popular in the beginning of rs2...Di did most their pking in p2p, same with Devils and ZF.. For the first month or 2 of rs2 you would be correct. How ever like i said , this was when di had near 200 members and close to 115 to 120 combat average and every one else had 100 members 100 combat average Meeturpker99 hp before you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
45chris2 Posted May 6, 2007 Share Posted May 6, 2007 it would be #1 DI #2 GLADZ #3 RSD #4 DS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
00 Quanta Posted May 6, 2007 Author Share Posted May 6, 2007 Sabres , Bdk, Rune Mob, RSD , DI , DS In that order. Most Dominant clan from classic. BDK Most dominant clan from RS2. Ds Why Ds and not DI ? Simply cause Ds grew from nothing , they didnt have massive ammount of numbers come to them from the undisputed #1 clan to help them. If any of you remember , DI was [cabbage] before RSD closed. They were nobodys. Its why they got their [wagon] handed to them in less then 15 mins in a official war with RSD. After RSD closed many members had no wheres to go except DI which opened their arms for them to help boost their member count. Yea DI dominated blahdy blah , but they did it during a time when the next best clans average combat was 103 ish to their 115ish (not exact figures but you get the idea). As soon as a clan came up that was equal to them what happened? They lost ...and got owned repeatedly on f2p . Di has dominated MB on p2p , not p2p entirely. Theyve always left that to the rest of the clans that pked p2p like WG. Yes once in a while they do multi pk , but they are usually found at mb and mb only. Mb doesnt prove your clan is dominant , it proves you got more members from your clan pking. b4 MB it was always p2p multi, p2p multi was popular in the beginning of rs2...Di did most their pking in p2p, same with Devils and ZF.. For the first month or 2 of rs2 you would be correct. How ever like i said , this was when di had near 200 members and close to 115 to 120 combat average and every one else had 100 members 100 combat average it for way over first 2 months...it was more like a year and a half Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiddofwis Posted May 6, 2007 Share Posted May 6, 2007 Sabres , Bdk, Rune Mob, RSD , DI , DS In that order. Most Dominant clan from classic. BDK Most dominant clan from RS2. Ds Why Ds and not DI ? Simply cause Ds grew from nothing , they didnt have massive ammount of numbers come to them from the undisputed #1 clan to help them. If any of you remember , DI was [cabbage] before RSD closed. They were nobodys. Its why they got their [wagon] handed to them in less then 15 mins in a official war with RSD. After RSD closed many members had no wheres to go except DI which opened their arms for them to help boost their member count. Yea DI dominated blahdy blah , but they did it during a time when the next best clans average combat was 103 ish to their 115ish (not exact figures but you get the idea). As soon as a clan came up that was equal to them what happened? They lost ...and got owned repeatedly on f2p . Di has dominated MB on p2p , not p2p entirely. Theyve always left that to the rest of the clans that pked p2p like WG. Yes once in a while they do multi pk , but they are usually found at mb and mb only. Mb doesnt prove your clan is dominant , it proves you got more members from your clan pking. b4 MB it was always p2p multi, p2p multi was popular in the beginning of rs2...Di did most their pking in p2p, same with Devils and ZF.. For the first month or 2 of rs2 after rsd closed you would be correct. How ever like i said , this was when di had near 200 members and close to 115 to 120 combat average and every one else had 100 members 100 combat average it for way over first 2 months...it was more like a year and a half far from it , rs2 was released march 29th or the 19th 2004 , the war was in june between RSD and DI . Til that time RSD owned any clan on rs , DI in cluded. You may think di won all these pk run ins according to DI history but ive never read such a load of crap in my life. I personally led rsd pks and di never would give us a fight , they wouldnt even come in wild if they knew we was out. After rsd closed then DI became known as number one clan . And Di owned the wild when there was no one else. As soon as some good clans came around DI weakened . Became nobodys. Its why they cant even win today , such as them vs DF. Its because now days there is actual clans on the same level as them. Meeturpker99 hp before you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
00 Quanta Posted May 6, 2007 Author Share Posted May 6, 2007 Sabres , Bdk, Rune Mob, RSD , DI , DS In that order. Most Dominant clan from classic. BDK Most dominant clan from RS2. Ds Why Ds and not DI ? Simply cause Ds grew from nothing , they didnt have massive ammount of numbers come to them from the undisputed #1 clan to help them. If any of you remember , DI was [cabbage] before RSD closed. They were nobodys. Its why they got their [wagon] handed to them in less then 15 mins in a official war with RSD. After RSD closed many members had no wheres to go except DI which opened their arms for them to help boost their member count. Yea DI dominated blahdy blah , but they did it during a time when the next best clans average combat was 103 ish to their 115ish (not exact figures but you get the idea). As soon as a clan came up that was equal to them what happened? They lost ...and got owned repeatedly on f2p . Di has dominated MB on p2p , not p2p entirely. Theyve always left that to the rest of the clans that pked p2p like WG. Yes once in a while they do multi pk , but they are usually found at mb and mb only. Mb doesnt prove your clan is dominant , it proves you got more members from your clan pking. b4 MB it was always p2p multi, p2p multi was popular in the beginning of rs2...Di did most their pking in p2p, same with Devils and ZF.. For the first month or 2 of rs2 after rsd closed you would be correct. How ever like i said , this was when di had near 200 members and close to 115 to 120 combat average and every one else had 100 members 100 combat average it for way over first 2 months...it was more like a year and a half far from it , rs2 was released march 29th or the 19th 2004 , the war was in june between RSD and DI . Til that time RSD owned any clan on rs , DI in cluded. You may think di won all these pk run ins according to DI history but ive never read such a load of crap in my life. I personally led rsd pks and di never would give us a fight , they wouldnt even come in wild if they knew we was out. After rsd closed then DI became known as number one clan . And Di owned the wild when there was no one else. As soon as some good clans came around DI weakened . Became nobodys. Its why they cant even win today , such as them vs DF. Its because now days there is actual clans on the same level as them. So you say Di weakened when TD was born? No...they kept their strength still Di isn't as good as it was because their original members quit Rs, they lost 60+ of their old school members, pretty much their best pkers... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiddofwis Posted May 6, 2007 Share Posted May 6, 2007 Sabres , Bdk, Rune Mob, RSD , DI , DS In that order. Most Dominant clan from classic. BDK Most dominant clan from RS2. Ds Why Ds and not DI ? Simply cause Ds grew from nothing , they didnt have massive ammount of numbers come to them from the undisputed #1 clan to help them. If any of you remember , DI was [cabbage] before RSD closed. They were nobodys. Its why they got their [wagon] handed to them in less then 15 mins in a official war with RSD. After RSD closed many members had no wheres to go except DI which opened their arms for them to help boost their member count. Yea DI dominated blahdy blah , but they did it during a time when the next best clans average combat was 103 ish to their 115ish (not exact figures but you get the idea). As soon as a clan came up that was equal to them what happened? They lost ...and got owned repeatedly on f2p . Di has dominated MB on p2p , not p2p entirely. Theyve always left that to the rest of the clans that pked p2p like WG. Yes once in a while they do multi pk , but they are usually found at mb and mb only. Mb doesnt prove your clan is dominant , it proves you got more members from your clan pking. b4 MB it was always p2p multi, p2p multi was popular in the beginning of rs2...Di did most their pking in p2p, same with Devils and ZF.. For the first month or 2 of rs2 after rsd closed you would be correct. How ever like i said , this was when di had near 200 members and close to 115 to 120 combat average and every one else had 100 members 100 combat average it for way over first 2 months...it was more like a year and a half far from it , rs2 was released march 29th or the 19th 2004 , the war was in june between RSD and DI . Til that time RSD owned any clan on rs , DI in cluded. You may think di won all these pk run ins according to DI history but ive never read such a load of crap in my life. I personally led rsd pks and di never would give us a fight , they wouldnt even come in wild if they knew we was out. After rsd closed then DI became known as number one clan . And Di owned the wild when there was no one else. As soon as some good clans came around DI weakened . Became nobodys. Its why they cant even win today , such as them vs DF. Its because now days there is actual clans on the same level as them. So you say Di weakened when TD was born? No...they kept their strength still Di isn't as good as it was because their original members quit Rs, they lost 60+ of their old school members, pretty much their best pkers... Td never reached DI's strength , and yes they did weaken. Di lost members when clans like Rot took them , youll find their old school members in different clans. Clan members come and go , just because they leave doesnt mean a clan weakens. I was in di , i helped getting members to sign up when the clan was first made. There was maybe 8 original members left in the clan a year after they opened Meeturpker99 hp before you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bufoman Posted May 6, 2007 Share Posted May 6, 2007 I feel a little reminder is in order: please stop with the nested quotes. as far as Im concerned nested quotes are quotes with more than 3 people's posts in them. Thank You. Clan Moderator from December 15th 2006- August 20th 2007Founder of: Terran Gamers, formerly known as Militos Deci Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiddofwis Posted May 6, 2007 Share Posted May 6, 2007 I feel a little reminder is in order: please stop with the nested quotes. as far as Im concerned nested quotes are quotes with more than 3 people's posts in them. Thank You. ever wonder why these boards died? Meeturpker99 hp before you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
haqiang Posted May 7, 2007 Share Posted May 7, 2007 The most dominating clan in my opinion is the one tend to be hated the most................... which of course, will not actually people's choice when picking the most dominating clan because they hate them. :x :x :x :x We are all biased #-o #-o imo DI probably dominated rs for a while back in the day, I used to always loses my nerve when I see bunch of people in blue capes. Which Final Fantasy Character Are You?Final Fantasy 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saukko93 Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 International - Damage Inc Country - Fools Barrows drops: 17 - Ahrims staff x 2, Guthans platebody x 2, Dharoks greataxe, Dharoks platelegs, Karils leathercoif x 2, Veracs flail, Ahrims robeskirt x 3, Guthans warspear, Karils leatherskirt, Karils leathertop, Torags hammers x2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now