D. V. Devnull

Hi there, K.M. ... :^_^: It does not matter what resolution that you take the screenshots at. The image data will still be the same pixel-for-pixel size. The only thing that can differ is how it looks based on physical monitor size and selected monitor resolution, but it will have no effect on the actual image itself. So it could look big at one resolution or small at another, but it would all be the same single image that never changed size which is being displayed. :thumbsup: Hope that helps. :D ~Mr. D. V. "It's all the same image size, doesn't matter your screen size!" Devnull (p.s.: I hope you didn't 'iggy' me here too, or you'll miss this fine post... And I hope your chat 'iggy' was just a troll joke...)

3792 ... Damn... I'm still waking up. And no, the headache I have isn't from that wall :arrow: :wall: ~D. V. "Uuuuuuuugghhhhh..." Devnull

I wonder if I'll get to count about 3807 sheep. Pardon me while I get some sleep. -_- ~Mr. D. V. "ZZZzzz..." Devnull

I see why... Apparently, the page code contains... <a name="bead"> It should contain... <a name="beads"> ...in order to provide a proper hyperlink anchor reference. Shouldn't take more than a few minutes to fix, IMHO, as it was just an accidental typo. :geek: ~D. V. "Typos... fun stuff..." Devnull

3812 ... had to find where you got on-track again before I could stop banging my head on a wall. :wall: ~Mr. D. V. "Confused for a few here..." Devnull

Thanks for your input. Because of issues like these, our disclaimer at the bottom of each web page mentions you need at least version 3.x of a Mozilla based browser. So rather than trying to make everything work on every browser, we chose to support only those versions that we can rely upon actually working with the level of Javascript code we throw at it. :rolleyes: Besides that, the table sorter we implemented on that page does not support sorting on more than one column. If it seems to do so, it's just plain luck. I know there are other sorters which are able to do that, but those don't support the nifty filters we want to use on the worlds list page. And finally; The fix for the sort problem on the Players column is on it's way. Patience, grasshopper. :ugeek: Well, I do know how it could be improved then... First, make just one level previous of browser series a minimum compatibility line to shoot for. Second, use cookies to store the sorting method on all browsers, thereby allowing for much more complex sorting methods cross-platform, such as Jagex previously did with their own World Select page system prior to integration in the RS Java Applet. (Such worked all the way back with FireFox 1.5, which I used to use!) :thumbsup: BTW, I won't be upset if the first of the two doesn't happen. Might be slightly upset (but not to the point I'd come annoy someone) if the second didn't happen. And don't worry, as I'm very patient... I could wait near forever for the bug to get fixed. Would be cool to see the bugfix include the improvement, though... *overkill hint* :-w ~D. V. "Always a way to improve... I'll leave the choice to the Tip.It Crew..." Devnull

3841 ... End of page. ;) ~D. V. "Done, Done, on to the next one!" Devnull

I'll assume you had an accidental double post thanks to internet lag, Albel... First time I've seen something like this with Tip.It Forums, though... :mellow: 3844 ... and not out of step unless a Moderator ninjas out a post. :!: ~Mr. D. V. "That has to be an OOPS..." Devnull

Question for you... Which do you want transparency applied to? The white part? The black part? Or do you perhaps want one of each? :huh: Further, if you're going to use it on this forum, did you know that each version will only work with half of the themes, at least as the list stands? (Don't know if you were going to... Just asking!) :mellow: ~Mr. D. V. "Just a few things that I thought were worth clarifying." Devnull

3847 ~D. V. "At a lack of anything to say right now..." Devnull (p.s.: My brain just isn't that awake right now.)

I get to add one more bug to this list... :? Apparently, at least in FireFox 2.0.0.x-series, if you attempt to sort more than one criteria at a time, it doesn't take the request properly, and really messes up. For example, try sorting first by world number, and then try to stack F2P/P2P status with it. Or even try to do this process in reverse. What a mess... :sad: I don't know if this is linked to the alphanumeric/numeric bug or what, but I thought I would post it up here so that it could be noticed and handled as soon as possible. I'm also not sure, but I think it also occurs to a lesser degree on FireFox 3.5.x-series. :| ~D. V. "Am I running into every bug in the world?" Devnull

3862 ... Cool, it picked up while I was out. :) ~D. V. "Nice!" Devnull

3871 ... Slow day... :huh: ~Mr. D. V. "It couldn't get slower than this?" Devnull

Hello, Tip.It Crewbies... :) I went over to have a look at the all-new "Worlds List" page @ http://www.tip.it/runescape/?worldlist that you put a news post up for... Very quickly, I ran into a major sorting issue with the "Players" sorting mode. Apparently, it doesn't understand that thousands are a greater value than hundreds, and that tens are less than hundreds, and so it does something like this: I can only begin to imagine how chaotic this would look with single digits... :unsure: As you can already figure, I'm thinking it should have looked more like: ... as that would have better allowed users of the page to select a world with more/less/middle amounts of people present on a given world at a given time. That, and it would behave similarly to the RuneScape Java Applet. So I thought I would come along, since no one else had already began a thread about this, and give you all a heads-up so you can change it quickly. That is, unless this sorting design was intentional, which I hope it wasn't? :blink: ~Mr. D. V. "This wasn't intentional, right?" Devnull (p.s.: I'm not even sure where the "OFFLINE" ones fit...)

42? 3887 LOL... that's just the Ultimate Answer... I don't think anyone actually figured out the Ultimate Question, although it would have been nice if someone had... At least, within the limits of the "HitchHiker's Guide To The Galaxy" universe, anyway. :P 3875 ~Mr. D. V. "Wouldn't some of us have liked to know?" Devnull

Why would we do that, when it ends we just start over again! To simulate the effect of what happens when the Ultimate Question, and the Ultimate Answer, happen to exist in the same universe, in the same singular mind, and at the same time, of course. ;) 3892 ~Mr. D. V. "As you can see, there might be a reason for a nuke..." Devnull

Just checked that page and saw it myself... To make it more easy for Tip.It's Crew, they will need ID #'s: 288 (Zombie -3-) and 45 (Giant Bat) in order to fix those, respectively. :thumbsup: ~D. V. "Have fun!" Devnull

Too flaming true... LOL :lol: ... Unluckily, I got addicted myself, and can't stop. Too many fellow players on my buddy list that I would end up leaving behind. :( ... And then, there's the fact that I would have never run into Tip.It (and its' fine community) if I had never become addicted. I guess we'll call that a plus? :huh: Sadly, this music piece is also too interruptable by [bleep]ers IRL who don't listen to what you're already doing... But, at least the volume levels are reasonable, so +15 points for technical rating... :thumbup: ~Mr. D. V. "I sometimes wish I had never gotten addicted." Devnull

3907 I wonder... Should I set off a nuke when this thread is done? :huh: ~Mr. D. V. "Boom, anyone?" Devnull

3915 ... -_- ~D. V. "ZZZzzz..." Devnull

3922 ... Knew it... chock one up for my paranormal senses... you didn't pull it off, so it was impossible for all of you, and I even gave you all day long in addition to the overnight period. :ugeek: ~D. V. "No question, it was impossible." Devnull

Nice double. :thumbup: 3938 ... and I'm taking a snooze -_- ... I wonder if you'll all manage to push it below 3800, before I get back in about 10 hours :-k ... nah, that would be an impossible task, even for the lot of you ... :P ~Mr. D. V. "ZZZZzzzz......." Devnull

3941 ... and this is your kick-in-the-rear to start the next page... Get Moving. :ugeek: ~Mr. D. V. "Yes, I'm gonna be a taskmaster about this." Devnull

I was hoping that would happen in my absence and I wouldn't be bothered with this thread any further... One year later, I come back for other reasons, and what do I find? THIS THREAD, STILL AT IT, and pretty well messed up, too. I think I laid out a small smattering of gankings shortly afterward. :P 3956 ~D. V. "I wish it would move fast, but I think we're still in for the long haul." Devnull

3960 ... I'll take the page so the rest of you can just rip to it. :P ~D. V. "And here we go!" Devnull