1_man_army

I couldn't care less what he calls his album. I'm far more interested in the music thats on the album than the title of it.

Arsenal play at the Emirates Stadium now.

I was watching an episode of Fresh Prince the other day and about halfway through it I realised that it had Don Cheadle (from Hotel Rwanda, Crash & Traffic) in it. It was really funny to see him before he became a star and before he became so successful.

Well as a Scotsman thats basically the sum total of my knowledge of the bagpipes as well. My lack of musical knowledge over-rules my Scottishness :P .

I remember reading about this before (as it happens to me occasionally). As far as I remember it's something to do with your blood pressure when you stand up quickly. I don't think it's that major.

I can speak English (my native language) and I can speak just about enough French to get by.

Great film, it's such a shame that Malick took so long to return to film making. He's a great directer.

Booo, hang your head in shame at going for such an obvious joke :shame: .

In my opinion a member of the public or a witness has every right and a responsibility to testify against somebody who committed a crime. However, if two people commit a crime fully knowing the possible result and then one of them turn on their accomplice to save their own backside, they are scum. It's just like the old cliche - if you can't do the time don't do the crime. Selling out an accomplice to me, is a terrible way to do things. It's actually fairly commonly done, I see no problem with it, it helps bag the more serious parts of the crime, get them for sure instead of a possibility of them walking. I'm well aware that it's commonplace but I still don't agree with it. If an adult is part of a crime he/she should be willing to accept their punishment .

In my opinion a member of the public or a witness has every right and a responsibility to testify against somebody who committed a crime. However, if two people commit a crime fully knowing the possible result and then one of them turn on their accomplice to save their own backside, they are scum. It's just like the old cliche - if you can't do the time don't do the crime. Selling out an accomplice to me, is a terrible way to do things.

So really, what's wrong with wiretapping? Does it interrupt your phone calls and personal life? probably not. Do you have anything to hide? No, but if you do. they need to tap you to find out, and any terrorist activities, etc. can be stopped before they have begun. By that logic they should be allowed to put a tracker up your backside and have somebody follow you around all day everyday. If you aint doing anything wrong....

...and who says they don't make criminal masterminds like they used to? :roll:

One of the original Chili's (Hillel Slovak) did die, he was replaced by John Frusciante. Other than that I agree with what you said.

You didn't offend me on a personal level don't worry about that. As for being inexperienced in debate, I'm old enough and have been posting on these boards long enough to put across my point.At the end of the day I just think you're wrong on this though.

What does it matter? By hiding behind Christianity, does that make Islam less violent? Try not to use strawmen in arguments, it makes you look stupid What I was clearly pointing out was that the problem is not the religion but literalism and fundamentalism as is the case with every religion. Try to stop throwing around your little insults every time somebody disagrees with you, it just makes you seem like an unreasonable brat.

This reminds me of a saying one of teachers used; The only way forward with Iran and North Korea is to engage them in negotiations. By expelling them from the diplomatic process all you do is create further resentment within the country which can (and will) be used by it's leader and instill the government with a resilience to do what they want. Negotiation works in the long run, look at whats happened with Libya in the last few years. Could you have imagined Libya would be as co-operative as they have been recently 20 years ago? No because at that time the west decided it was best to completely shun Libya and ultimately it didn't work. Mohammad did. So does the bible. A literal reading of several religions can justify murder.

White people made country music.. :ohnoes: Country music is auditory Hell :ohnoes: . Country > Crap > rap Rap artist do not define every black person there is, and besides, music is nothing to do with this. So shut up. [/hide] Actually they do. Every colored person I've seen has listened to rap. And how about you shut up boy. I bet you said that because you are one of the white kids who acts black and listens to rap. :-X -.- What a sweeping generalisation, you have anymore?

Scotland 3 - Ukraine 1 Another great win against the odds, it was a tough match but we got through it. All we need now is 4 of the 6 points left and we're through. Georgia away this week and then Italy at Hampden next month - Bring Them On! :D

My username is pretty simple. When I first created my character I was looking for an imposing name that would make my character seem tough, strong and able to kill all the other players, hence "1 Man Army." That being said it was a badly chosen name because I was a pretty poor and undedicated Runescape player when I played and was unable to kill most players :).

Christ, will this topic ever die? It's like tip.it's very own Keith Richards - it just keeps on going. Even the completely paranoid hysteria isn't funny anymore.

I definitely wouldn't have given it back purely because any person or organisation that takes so little care with that much money clearly has too much.

Personally I don't like wearing ties. I don't like having anything around my neck, I don't like the constriction. I'm a bit strange in that sense, I don't put anything around my neck - no tie or chain. That being said if I have to wear a tie I will under protest.

If it's in the same country, wouldn't it just go to the FA? Like when that Spuds fan threw a punch at Lampard last season? I think thats different because the Spurs incident was in a domestic game that was under the control of the FA. I think UEFA have to handle this because it's in a UEFA competition,which would make it under UEFA's legislation. So in the hypothetical that was given by Harrington it would depend if it was a domestic or European game. Well thats my understanding of it anyway but don't take that as 100% accurate.

I agree that Celtic should keep better control of their fans as a general rule but you can't legislate for one single muppet, especially when looked at in the context of the events. The guy should never have been there but he was never a risk to anyone, that being said I'll concede that he could have been. However, I don't think you can treat a potential risk to players in the same way you treat a case were a fan has attacked somebody on the pitch. I have no sympathy with Dida though. This is a man who has been the victim of real fan violence when an Inter fan threw a flare at him. I'd have expected that Dida out of everyone on the pitch that night, wouldn't have been so cynical. I was wrong. edit - can I point out I've no bias on this, I'm a Rangers fan rather than a Celtic fan trying to defend my own team. [/hide] Your one to talk about a set of fans you idiot. your fans are worse. Stealing tickets off kids. Although I disagree with Busba here, you are still a muppet Raz. Please stop trying to score points at every opportunity.

He used to live not far from me, his daughter was at my high school and surprisingly she is quite good looking (maybe she's adopted thats the only explanation). Also Scott Brown (Celtic player) went to my high school and his brother was in my class. Gordon Brown made a speech at my school once and then he was at the opening ceremony of the new school building so I met him at both events. Oh and when I was at the Nou Camp in Barcelona I met Pierluigi Collina (famous bald football referee). I didn't realise he was so tall. Thats it.