Ginger_Warrior

How about an applet where YOU design the logo? Kinda like in Mario Kart DS, when you could design your own avatar. Then, you could pass on those logos across the community by posting your logo into a kinda board, where other players can retrieve the logo from. Think... all Tip.Iters with a Tip.It cape... :

10/10! And me and Mc90123 are now famous! w00t! :D Seriously, great guide!

Hold on here... Nintendo are reverting back to what they always did best - beautiful simplicity which appeals to a wider audience. I would class myself as one of those loyal Nintendo gamers (having not had any other console in my life), and I don't mind them appealing to the wider audience. Put it this way - I'd rather play Brain Training than half the games of both the Xbox 360 and PS3, they're just all the same. Teenage lad shoots-'em-ups; it gets boring after a while. Also, I think most Nintendo fanboys wouldn't mind losing out a bit if it means SONY suffer that little bit more. I think we all know of the hatred between those two sets of fanboys.

Wha!? Where've you found that out!? :cry: I made a new avatar and everything for Young Link too. Ah well, looks nice anyway. :roll:

What are you on about? That has nothing to do with this thread...

+1 Too all the people defending Flag Holding... CW is a Capture the Flag game. Name me one other CTF game that allows you to hold your own flag? Certainly, I've never played on, and it made the games a lot mroe interesting, lemme tell you. The whole point of these games is to encourage an exciting, attacking game. At the moment, it's dull and defensive. And as proved by Manchester City FC last year, defensive play is boring... -.-

Considering yesterday's poll on Gamefaqs.com actually said the one game most people were impressed by was Mario Kart Wii, and that the poll was dominated by Nintendo-developed entries, and that (as your source shows) the PS3 proved to be a big nightmare, I'd say you're looking at that order upside-down...

A total of 9 months actually :o , big number :roll: Thats like 270 days :shock: Bare in mind it's actually been out for more than 2600 days... it's a tiny number. Has anyone heard about the news in Europe? Yep, you Americans get it cut down to about ÃÆââ¬Å¡Ãâã250 ($495 I think), while we Europeans have been told there will be no price cut, and the console will remain at ÃÆââ¬Å¡Ãâã425 - about ÃÆââ¬Å¡Ãâã175 more than it would be over the Pond. Are they intent on destroying their fanbases in here in Australia? I never though I'd see the day where Nintendo, despite its complete neglegence of the EU, would actually have a bigger fanbase here for its Wii than SONY have for the PS3...

Just a question - is Young Link going to be in this one? I liked him the most, all the skills of smash power of Link, but twice as fast and effective. :)

It's also doubely funny when you consider he was part of Hitler's unique sect of Catholicism aswell. :roll: Seriously, why did they vote this guy into this role? He won't do anything to bring the masses back to church services, and he actualyl lot a lot of respect with me when he agreed to host an audience with the Katey and Liam McCann - he should have been the one telling them what for for being so neglegant in the first place.

The biggest reason some people dislike emos is because of the oldest reason known to man - they're different, and this makes those people feel threatened and uncomfortable. Hence all the blatent stereotypical posts about emos wanting to kill themselves. In the emo-filled college I've been going to for a whole year now, I've not yet seen one person that wants to either slit themselves or take their own life. Nor have I seen any that are particularly weird.

Order of the Pheonix... I know that and I don't even read HP. It's crap IMO. Don't flame me! :anxious:

Everyone has their "Red Lines". For me, as an existentialist, I don't think I could have a relationship with someone who believes there is a higher body other than ourselves. That would be crossing my line. So in answer to you question, no. I wouldn't even try to cope with it - I can't even get along with these kinds of people. I'm not intolerant, our ideologies are just too far apart to relate to each other.

Depends. Define "popular". As in, there are more people that use it, or more people that like it?

So do you know a dieticion I could ask about this, from the inside of my office, for free? Thought so. There are several on the Internet, and failing that, I'm sure neither of you two are actually in a position to comment on an area of science which takes several years at degree level to fully understand. The Internet is great... it however doesn't replace a University degree, nor does it give you a position to comment on such matters. And I'm fairly sure very few of us have degrees in several matters, should we just stop talking about them as well? Only thing I am asking is he back up what he says, I'm not doing it for him. lol, we're arguing two completely different things here. Fair enough, although with fairness he did try to.

So do you know a dieticion I could ask about this, from the inside of my office, for free? Thought so. There are several on the Internet, and failing that, I'm sure neither of you two are actually in a position to comment on an area of science which takes several years at degree level to fully understand. The Internet is great... it however doesn't replace a University degree, nor does it give you a position to comment on such matters.

^ Why don't the two of you stop arguing and ask several dieticians? I'm sure they'd know what the balance is... Intelligent Discussion > Flaming

There's load of programs out there, but TBH, I'd suggest learning how to program yourself. I'd imagine it would be a lot more rewarding.

[hide]quote="Eelspremier"]Oh Sorry Ginger, may I offer up my apologies. There was just too much stupidity mixed up with his point that I totally overlooked what he was trying to say. I still can't believe I made that mistake! [/hide] If all you're gonna so is flame his post instead of actually putting an argument against it, I don't think I need to say much more. Just because his views opposes yours doesn't make it invalid. [hide] [/hide] Again, attack the person's argument, not the person themselves. You just look arrogant... However, at least you managed to provide a point there. Maybe I should have been a bit more specific with that statement. What you say is true when you're talking about your own domestic affairs - because the decisions that you make affect only you and your future. However, the point I'm making still remains. What gives you the right to make a decision, based purely on speculations about your own future, and then force those decisions on another country whom's policies and ideologies really have nothing to do with you? Unless you confess to fact the US is only looking after its own interests, and actually doesn't care about the Iraqi people's opinions at all, considering most want a complete withdrawal and don't feel the US is "obliged" to owe them anything. Now I'll deal with mad4u689, which much to his/her credit, is actually providing an offer for a debate, not some slagging off duel. [hide] [/hide] Diplomacy only works when all parties can meet in the first place. The impressions I get is that not all groups in Iraq want to be part of Iraq, while others so. For them this is a just a "Red Line" that can't be crossed, so I doubt all three of them can come to a three-state solution, at least not through diplomacy anyway. As for peace talks... you only have to look at the History of Ireland to understand religious tensions don't go away just because people start talking. While it would be nice if this was a solution, I doubt it can be considered as one. [hide] [/hide] OK, maybe so. Aside form the fact you kinda defeated yourself in your own argument, there's still dozens of key infrastructure that aren't better. Electricity for one. In the modern day, a hospital without electricity would only work to arounds half its efficiency. While there are examples of the situation improving, there are much more examples of things worsening. [hide] [/hide] Sure, and I agree - you can understand the present if you understand the past. The revolution wouldn't be the same as others in the past - they were some two-hundred years ago and the world's moved on. But what about America? OK, the British Empire was the state the colonists were opposed to, but those colonists had been through revolution before, or at least knew about it. So in essence, they were guided. They still however needed a revolution before they could establish their own form of government, and I think nearly all Americans would agree that while it's nice, it was necessary. I feel the same for Iraq - it may not be nice, or the ideal solution with hindsight from five years back, but is it necessary to relieve the pressure in the country and its surrounding area? I would say, "Yes". It's fine if you disagree with me on that, but that's what I strongly feel is the best solution for Iraq in the long-term. We can protect them for fifty years while their government establishes itself, and we can carry on losing troops. Would it relieve that pressure? No, so what would be the point in doing that? [hide] [/hide] Agreed, however, I see it like this. We can remove ourselves from the equation while the extemists are strong in numbers, or we can leave later when they're stronger thanks to the fact we're occupying their soil. In my opinion, staying actually poses more of a threat, not less. As for the last quote, I really CBB doing all the coding for that as well lol, but fine. If that's what the Iraqi people want, then so be it. I'm not suggesting revolution would be what most Iraqis want, I'm saying it would be best for them. And before someone holds me to hypocracy for what I said earlier on that, unlike the Americans, I'm not taking action on what I think it best for them, but I'd rather let them make that decision themselves. Also, while the main priority of the American Government is the wellbeing of its citizens, this isn't a justification to stay in Iraq, only a motive. The two are very different. Over... phew...

Correct. That way, America can stop things from becoming too extreme, while allowing Iraq to undergo its own revolution and not being directly cuaght in the middle. This is the policy they should have started from the beginning - encouraging a resistance cell inside Saddam's regime. Correction - you're presuming everyone will say it's a bad decision. The fact is most of your population wants you out. People who support your view are a dying minority.

You think that's astounding? Perhaps going from such a strong position, to a console that's not selling off the shelves just a few months after it's released is even more astoundingly bad IMO... The Wii's actually selling faster at the moment than the PS2, so don't sing your glory songs yet. :wink:

Just because the majority of people say it whereever you live doesn't make it grammatically correct. You've still not answered my point - there is no such thing as a mathematic. There is such a thing as mathematics. Therefore, logic would follow for the abbreviation to be "maths", not "math". It was a flippent point anyway. If that's the only hole you can pick in my post, then I think I did pretty darn good. :wink:

Don't worry Eelspremier, it's not your fault you and KnightLife actually missed the whole point of his post. :wink: I actually agree with superson. There is no proof Iraq would descend into a cesspool of terrorism if you withdraw your forces. You can't decide your actions based on what might happen in the future. 9/11 was an extreme case of terrorism. The way solve cases such as 9/11 isn't to go about bombing every country with a dodgy leader. It's to use intelligence to foil potential plots. Therefore, you no longer have any justification for staying in Iraq. It makes me laugh when people use the recent terrorist attempts at Glasgow and London as a case for staying in Iraq, considering the Iraq War clearly didn't stop them, and it was actually foiled thanks to the vigilence of the ambulance service in London - in other words, the vigilence of the public. Not the work of soldiers in Iraq.

I'm concerned abot how they took our release dates off... you just know they're gonna set it back. This is Nintendo we're on about. *sigh*

I'm not debating whether there is a problem with the General board. I don't go on there long enough to get a real picture of it. However, we tried this with the Rants forum by making the Debate Club, but you still get some really mindless posts on there. Overall, the quality of the posts is better, but to suggest this would completely divide "chatty" discussion from "serious" discussion is, if I'm perfectly honest, narrow-minded. No offense there, I just don't see this as a solution.