The European model of slavery really didn't have much to do with Christianity. I know there were a lot of other factors involved, but religion was important too. They considered the native Americans and the Africans soulless, and therefore they had no feelings and were basically nothing more than animals. They were fair game for slavery, basically. Of course, it was also simply convenient to use slaves, and I'm not sure to what extent the Europeans actually believed this. :D You're probably more educated on this subject Those are accurate statements, but they did not believe that because those groups weren't Christians. The European model mostly traded slaves from the western coast of Africa (heavily concentrated in what is now Liberia) and native Americans were rarely used as slaves because more often than not they could not survive the strenuous slave labor (the same can be seen with natives in South America--specifically Brazil). Studies like this one are a better idea of why Europeans believed Africans deserved to be enslaved. While you are correct in saying they are "soulless", it was not simply because they weren't Christian. Christians believed in the Great Chain of Being and if studies like Crania Americana proved Africans (among other ethnicities) were biologically different from white Christians, i.e. another species, then--according to the Great Chain of Being--they were lower on the totem pole and deserving of their enslavement. Religion did play a part, but not as big a part as people may think. Like I posted before, the economic reasons far outweighed the religious. The religious reasons were only to justify an already existing slave trade system that was based on economic needs. :mrgreen: