RichieMcD

Pure and utter [cabbage]. The legal fees would amounts to hundreds millions most likely if they took action against any person which watched a copyrighted video and very few judges would take this case seriously considering it's against a person who doesn't even know the material is copyrighted. They will win any case against youtube most likely but not against the average youtube user.

You're being idiotic carrying your "fake gun" around. Point it at someone and cops will be called. Cops will then suspect you as armed and dangerous and will not hesitate to shoot you if it looks like you'll point it at them or any other person. There have been events like this before, stupid kid carries fake gun around, stupid kid gets shot by cops, stupid kid dies. Why do you want guns legalized so much? Just an easier way for a person to injure / kill another person. America has legalized gun ownership, it also has a huge reputation for being trigger happy. Want the same to happen where you live?

It's all to cheap and to easy for children to get their hands on items which would be owned by adults only last decade. Mobile phones can be bought for 80, drugs are easy to find, alcohol is easy to get, 18's movies are easy to get. I don't think it's that they're growing up to fast, I just think all items are to easy for them to get. Yes I agree with you there isn't many good role models left for children any more. Take Paris Hilton for example, what has she achieved in life? Barely anything notable, her biggest selling item is that accidentally released porno of her yet teenage girls love her and look up to her. Every role model has a bad side these days, one of the sport stars I look up I played golf with recently, turns out he's an absolutely stuck-up [puncture]. Welcome to the 21st century, society doesn't care, teenagers act like adults and children act like teenagers.

Bah, the amount of money involved ruins it completely, if you want a good game played purely for pride watch 2 good football schools play eachother.

I think keep it the way it was. But take a much more serious approach to rule breakers. Let there be topics with the mature tag IMO. The mature tag provides a warning to users that the topic contains mature conversations, if they look at the topic and are offended then that is their fault for entering the topic since it was clearly shown it contains mature content. I agree with you that some posts are just nasty and should be censored while topics like "have you ever caught them" should be allowed since the mature tag is in place and as long as posts aren't to graphic I think they're ok. In a nutshell, allow mature topics, but take a much more serious approach to trolls / spammers / rule-breakers etc etc.

I'm not so sure to be honest. I know these are only quotes and it's so easy to lie, but he was 'deeply ashamed' when he was arrested and vowed never to do that kind of thing again - which he hasn't, so far. He says he grew up 'surrounded by drugs and violence' and to be honest I think turning your life around because you have your heart set on something and are determined to go and get it is more of an achievement than getting four As... I've grown up in a very poor area. When me and my friends get bored, we deliberately get the police after them for 15 minutes of fun. I occasionally use recreational drugs, I'm basically an alcoholic and I'm only 15. If I got caught in his position I wouldn't [cabbage] on about my upbringing, it's my fault for not accepting the risk that I might get caught while breaking into the shop.

Squirrels can't fire a sniper rifle If a cat can, I can't see how a squirrel couldn't

Ignore the ending part, that is debatable. Look at the first part though, where you see civilians cleaning up the remains for their houses. They are left without a home and were they compensated by the American government? No, no they weren't. It looks much more like a civilian group rather than a militant group. I doubt a militant group would run down a open road, using common sense it looks much more like a group of civilians standing on the corner of the road looking at what remains of their homes. Jackattack how would you like it if I bombed your house and possibly killed one or two of your family members while I was actually trying to attack a house 3 doors up from you? You wouldn't like it at all, you wouldn't like the fact that you've lost your home without compensation and that possibly some of your family members are dead. This was quite common during the bombings of major cities.

This doesn't look like much avoidance to me. This only looks like the bombing of a group of civilians to me, anyone else agree? 7AXN3H3BPQU

Mountain bike tester. My favorite sport. Get paid for riding bikes all day advising technicians on what to change and what could make it better :

The university has every right to refuse him, it's their establishment after all. You can't correct your wrongs over the period of 1 year.

When the bombing of cities occurred at the start of the Iraq war huge amounts of civilians were killed. The most commonly used bomb was a cluster bomb, these bombs can't be controlled as they drop smaller bombs the size of grenades over the distance of 3 football fields. When dropped over a city these will kill civilians, they are uncontrollable. It's like throwing a petrol bomb into a crowd of majoritly innocent people with a small group of hostiles. You can't control who will get burned. Bomb Iran, and you will bomb innocent civilians. sources Civilians killed ------- Stick to latter pages for start of war figures Cluster bombs

I suppose I could be considered racist, I've never called a person of different race to me a bad name, but I've always had a dislike for Britain / British people.

Sure, let's go in and kill a small minority of the target Iranians while killing huge amount of innocent civilians simply because the small minority has killed American troops, something you've not even provided a source for proof of your claims. One of my relatives was killed by British soldiers, does that justify me bombing Britain Jack? Same scenario, just on a smaller scale. Ginger_Warrior, that is the best way of putting Iraq I've ever seen, next time I'm talking to a pro-Iraq person I'll mention that one :

I feel no sympathy for him, I obviously do for the family since they've lost a family member. If there's signs all over it saying dangerous and 2 fences, one which is 6 feet high it is quite obviously dangerous. Instead of showing off / acting like an idiot he should've just called over some staff member and ask him to retrieve the item he lost.

The sooner a child knows what a condom is the better IMO. In the last few decades teenagers are becoming sexually active at increasingly earlier stages. It's better that they know what to do and what to use when the time comes. If a child is fully aware that what they see on a games console or movie screen is fake and can't be done in IRL then show it to them, let them kill pixelised people. Make sure they know it's allowed to happen IRL. Anyway with internet nowadays, a 8 year old can easily find pornos or videos of people being killed / tortured with basic webpages like google / yahoo. It's close to impossible to censor them.

1) Propaganda, it's all propaganda, for Iraq Bush just kept going on and on about how they posed a threat to American peace and had mass amounts of WMDs in Iraq. If they're successful with the propaganda then they'll have the backing of the nation, congress, citizens etc etc. With Bush in charge America can call war on anyone, Bush causes more damage to world peace than he stops. 2) Depends on what system they operate under, I.E democracy, fascism, communism. Since the 2 latter are run by dictators then it's simply down to if they want to go to war or not. In most democracies there are people with the power to veto certain things like wars. So if congress and the citizens aren't in support of going to war then it most likely wont happen. If a country is a member of the UN and wants to declare war on another member then they'll ask the UN, but this can be ignored like the UN's disapproval was for the war on Iraq.

Basically the average Runescaper works on this logic, if they're a lower level than you they're noob, if they're higher they're a no-lifer. Seriously though, noob is attitude, not level.

Common sense shows this a load of theoretical [cabbage] :lol: If it doesn't hit the ground then does it lie on it's side in mid-air?

Thanks for the rate. :)

Some very nice pics, especially the dog one :lol: What part of Ireland were you in, the 2nd last one looks quite like the northeast / Louth region. If you ever go to the west make sure to bring a camera, some of the most spectacular scenery you will ever see :

Pictures aren't working for me. I saw in BSC thought that you got it so 8/10 :

That is an amazing way to trim it. You've gone for 2 hard stats for your first 2 99's instead of the cook and fletch combo. Well done Bouwz, 10/10 Dude we still gotta Arma some time :|

Thanks for the rate Hobo.

Bulldogs charge is a pretty good game. Play it on a field, the objective is to fun from one side of the field to the other without being caught. When you start pick 2 people to be catchers, they pick one person to run. When the picked person runs a certain distance he calls out "Bulldogs charge", then everyone runs to the other side and anyone who gets tagged / tackled along the way is then a catcher. Slowly the runners diminish and get transfered to the catchers side. Enjoy being a leader at the camp :