obfuscator

But then how do you decide which clan/team they fight for? I see a few ways around it. Personally I don't have an issue with someone "multi-clanning" as long as they are legitimately in both clans. For example, when we fight Corruption in pvp I fully expect and understand to see several DH members there, and vice versa. What I don't like, is as JC said, some clans adding random people to their memberlist just to win a war. However, ML locks can be instituted if a particular clan is becoming a problem. It would be nice to see some sort of rule in place about this though I don't know how easily it could be enforced. And then the quintessential issue: what if clans with common members are going to fight a TWR war? For example Corruption and TKO. I think this really depends on what the clan officials decide amongst themselves. In general multi-clanners have a "main" clan, then a "country" clan, a CWA team, etc. Most "main" clans that allow "multi-clanning" don't allow other main clans; for example I couldn't join Legendz while still being in SE. However, I could join team TKO, or a country clan, a skilling clan, etc. The catch is Se always has to be my priority, and in general this is a rule that is enforced globally amongst "main" clans. This leads me to think that the problem will probably fix itself. Using my example of TKO vs Corruption, all Corruption members on TKO ml would likely have to fight for Corruption unless they had permission from a leader. I can't say for sure if things would work this way, it's just my general impression.

Wow I LOVE the third one, the second is great too :)

Your style is interesting, I would love to see the skull from the first picture on the body from the second :ohnoes:

First time must be nice. *hasn't happened to me*

I've never stated that abstinence is feasible for all and the be all and end all of birth control. All I'm saying is that if you don't have sex you won't get pregnant, or get std's. As for the rape argument, are you going to politely ask the rapist to wear a condom? Doubt it. In terms of abstinence not being birth control, I agree in the traditional sense, seeing as birth control isn't needed if you practice abstinence. Despite my personal beliefs I do support the teaching of all methods of "birth control" and letting people chose for themselves.

Looks like fun, gratz Illusion.

It might; however, considering after the weekends wars are usually over, they start to get flooded with declarations and I don't want this to be buried. We are currently discussing this particular TWR rule at a length and we'll be watching this topic; aka, it won't go unnoticed ;) Ok, fair enough. :lol: I love reading Downfall Comments. Back to the original question "I think multi-clanning should be you are only allowed to be in one clan total. What do you guys think?" I think as long as your in one TWR clan its okay since Most TWR clans don't do pvp it shouldn't interfere with there other Pvp clans and most wars take up to 30 minutes in Cw and also depends on type of war it is. so you still have alot of time to be in pvp clan if you have dedication and time to attend there events. So yea person being in OTHER CLANS and also TWR i don't think it should be against" rules " That's pretty much what I think, although I managed to say it without flaming :thumbup:

I really disagree with the tanking and Ko/ing having a bigger effect in CWA. In Cwa, everyone can tank, where in pvp, with snipers, transfers, and less obstacles tanking takes far more skill. I do agree about cwa showing more organization, or at least organization of a different sort.

I think this post should be in the TWR forum but I have a reply thought of so I'll speak my mind now. Multi-clanning is a phenomenon widely discouraged among the clan community. I consider it to be "NH" to be in more than one clan at once. However the TWR rules about multi-clanning only serve to help clarify how the TWR works. In order for there to be fewer disputes, it makes sense not to allow clans with members already in a TWR(country clan, team, or even main clan) to join. This is simply out of necessity as from my understanding there have been many disputes about this. If a person is in Collision (not on the TWR) and in a TWR clan, it really isn't the business of anyone involved in the TWR, as nothing is affected. Tip.it (the TWR in particular) shouldn't have to enforce a no multi-clanning policy, as that is really up to the discretion of the Clan leaders and the member in question.

I used to think that, but after studying Java for a year I haven't noticed much they can't do. As you said though, I think it might be with the load on the VM, and Java isn't the most memory efficient language.

I know of a few other ways that a girl can get pregnant, but what ones do you know of? Explain? I can think of a few things but they are pretty out there.

How the hell have you gotten a copy of The Soundhouse Tapes? If it is real, how have you been able to afford it? It costs a crapload of cash. I know there's an enormous amount of pirated copies of it, which looks the same. But if that really is one of the originals - Nice! ------ I'm surprised to see so many newly registered people/with so few posts, posting a picture of themselves the first thing they do. It is real. Bought it from eBay more than a year ago, and was kind of surprised that it truly was the real deal. I'm an avid Iron Maiden collector. And working makes you money. Wow, Soundhouse Tapes outa nowhere! If you don't mind, how much did it cost? Over $500. True. I'm a huge maiden fan, although not much into the memorabilia.

No... the USA is a 16 year old kid willing to use a shotgun to stop Jimmy (a 13 year old) from building a gun in his basement and bringing it to school in order to kill USA's sister Jenny. Both interesting analogies, I think that we know Jimmy is pulling Jessie's hair but think that Jimmy is going to kill Jessie later.

Didn't work for Virgin Mary :shame: Oh yeah. Cause the Bible is really a factual book :roll:. Seriously, why bring that up? Trying to be funny? Abstinence being 100% effective is a fact in no way influenced by religion. :thumbup:

Great to see how much you guys have accomplished. I've always had a respect for you based on your community and warring. Congrats on 5 years guys! :)

Laikrob has higher combat but Ninane is more active, so Ninane. Pan or Stu?

75% if you don't know what you're doing for condoms, 98% if you use it properly, birth control (depending on the brand) is 99.9% effective, because their can be a fault with the pills, or something can screw up. That is if you use it properly, and don't miss any days, or screw up with the scheduling of it, and there's always a minor chance of a defect in the pill. It's always recommended to use at least 2 forms of birth control, namely the pill, and condoms, or condoms and spermicide, or condom + diaphragm. I've never heard 98% for condoms, condom companies themselves won't even tell you that. Do you have a source? 98% is if you use them perfectly, 92-95% is if you use them good, I didn't write that out well. I could find a source, I read a lot of articles about condoms a few weeks back, I'll see if it's in my history. I also might not have remembered that correctly, I'll look. Can't find it, disregard the 98% thing. Ok. The highest I've heard is 90% if used 100% correctly.

Nice win Tk.

Congrats MoD.

Nice win Downfall :)

Nice win Akel :)

I wonder how many parents received a very, very odd request from their children after that. :shock: Indeed \ Also Laura nice triple post :P

75% if you don't know what you're doing for condoms, 98% if you use it properly, birth control (depending on the brand) is 99.9% effective, because their can be a fault with the pills, or something can screw up. That is if you use it properly, and don't miss any days, or screw up with the scheduling of it, and there's always a minor chance of a defect in the pill. It's always recommended to use at least 2 forms of birth control, namely the pill, and condoms, or condoms and spermicide, or condom + diaphragm. I've never heard 98% for condoms, condom companies themselves won't even tell you that. Do you have a source?

It hasn't stopped them so far. More and more it seems that, like the league of nations before it, the UN is a lame duck, without any real power to make a difference. I've heard that NK is trying to get negotiations started to formally end the Korean war, and thats why they are using these shows of force. I doubt that is the reason; the war has been at truce since the US left(though NK said the truce doesn't stand now so we could technically attack them :roll:) and its not like their were problems with the truce. Exactly, it ended in a truce, not a peace treaty. The fact that they are still technically at war doesn't constitute a "problem"?