mmmcannibalism

I meant religion has high points to clarify. Just a thought on perspective, what kind of religious difficulty do the eastern asia countries have? We can all agree religion has caused some problems in europe and America, but if religion accelerated the civilizing of all of humanity thats a good case for it. The Bessemer process for steel manufacturing resulted in factories that gave their workers terrible working conditions, but I doubt anyone would say steel is a bad thing. I realize this is a very stretched example, but its not fair to denounce religion solely on its bad points without considering what benefit it has had.

[hide=] American revolution=philosophy not religion. Gf The Crusades. And for a lesser example, the Troubles in Northern Ireland (not exactly a full-scale war, but damn lot of killing between the Protestant British and Irish Catholics.) [/hide] I fully agree a good bit of wars can be placed on religion, but its not almost all of them. Also, religion led to a war that ended slavery in the US so Id say it has its high points. Religion does cause a lot of problems, but then again so does science so its really a case by case matter.

American revolution=philosophy not religion. Gf

So...Am I missing something or is that Star Wars? yeah its star wars, I think coruscant is an example of our eventual future(may be a tad over 100 years though, not counting hyperspeed stuff)

yeah coruscant is the planet with the jedi council and republics capital.

yeah, the sinuses are back there so its not that solid. Note to self, spear zombie through the face

yes, the problem is that the blade would have to penetrate deeply enough into the skull. Its covered under rapiers/foils in the guide. Im wondering what potential there is to a farming scythe on a slightly extended handle, that might make a nice skull penetrator. I dont know how thick and durable a scythe blade is though but that would be a nice weapon.

I guess your right, humans are machines of the bio mechanical type after all wow I feel like a nerd (lets see who recognizes that statement)

because the grandson knew where the safe was?

Wtf. Since when were bananas alive? please tell me that was sarcasm, please

think coruscant from star trek

Can probably be shown with my method, but I am too lazy to do it and will just say that pures of a certain level deal damage faster than balanced players of the same level. It should also be considered that pures are possibly better fighters. A lot of the balanced players pking will be players on their main, and someone that spends most of their rs career pking is going to be better at it. (anticipates flaming)

value is relative, as long as some people value experience an effect on the economy would show.

well bravery probably has some biologic component, as does a lot of traits but personality is a mix of genes and life experience.

just a small thought its possible that if your attack role "hits" that your guarenteed at least one damage.

Skillcapes are less impressive than rares. depends on the skillcape here is one of the reasons rares are going down: you log on and 100mil appears in your bank along with a note that you have to use it today and you wont be able to resell it, would you rather have a party hat or an ags +full bandos. Before gwd there wasnt that choice(still valuble armor and such but god swords were a new level)

x=(1.672621637(83)×10^-27) (3000 * 10^8) (92) y=(1.67492729(28)×10^?27) (3000 * 10^8) (146) z=(9.10938215(45)×10^?31) (3000 * 10^8) (<32 * 8) e= x + y + z +- .5% If you want, you can calculate it out. I assure you, it is. (the energy in a Uranium atom) want to tell me how much energy that is? also, why arent there any squarings in your math there?

the key here is that the family has at least one male child, since it could be either the first or second child the order does matter. possible orders for at least one male male child then female child male child then male child female child then male child 2/3 have a female

natural selection is a process of change not a process of improvement. Modern medicine has altered natural selection, and the removal of it would alter the current path. If we were to suddenly need to go back to hunting large game for our sole source of food(without technology) clearly humanity would undergo a good bit of change. I think the best example of this is of a moth in I believe britain. There were white and black moths of the same species, the trees in the area had white bark which gave the white moths better camoflage from predators. This led to an increase in the appearence of the "white" trait until something important happened, the industrial revolution. Soot from nearby factories soon turned the tree trunks black and gave the black moth the camoflage advantage. After a few generations, the populations of black and white moths had flipped. The black moth was in now way superior to the white moth, situations however let natural selection "favor" the black moth.

I'm guessing the mom is a girl, so I'll say 100%. \ nice :lol: to quio, I dont think it changes the birth rate, the point is if they have at least one male child out of two the only possibilities for their childern are m-m m-f and f-m so there is a 2/3 chance they have a girl. The odds of a 2 child family having at least 1 girl are 3/4 because you can have m-m m-f f-m and f-f. When the question required one male child it altered the probability, you would think its one half, but he didnt say it was the first child that was a male.

I still say the splitting or anihilating of one atom isnt enough energy to be fatal.

2/3 assuming birth rate is 50/50 male female then the 4 possibilities are male+male male+female female+male female+female since they have to have 1 male child the "real" possibilities are male+male male+female female+male 2/3 chance

:lol: Dont worry about sounding sexist, someone had to think of that eventually.

22 have the nice advantage of barely kicking, you could shoot one all day without having a soar shoulder which is nice in a war like situation.

moving money back to a gold standard would be nearly impossible. I doubt that for every 1dollar in us money there is 1 dollar in gold. I really dont think this deserves other comment, as its assuming the world is a utopia that we can quick fix.