Sir_Kurity

Well, i honestly dont see why dung needed 120. The floors stop at 67 or whatever, and after that its really just binding items + chaotic weapons.

Rares, ranger boots, robins, and furys come to mind.

With a 1/5000 chance, theres a very real chance that you may never get it.

Generalizing that most pures are [developmentally delayed], and then hating most pures because of this. Some pures are, but that doesnt mean you should hate most pures. At the same time, some of low levels are whiny annoyances who complain about spot stealing, city doors, spam, dragon claws, ancients, game being to easy, just about anything (like you!), but i dont hate most low levels because of that.

Well, your rants are a little contradictory. "We dont want elitists" "Noobs gtfo" HMMMMMMMMMM

?????

You said you hate pures, which implys you hate all of them. Even if you "generally" hate pures, its still a crappy generalization. Pures generally are lower leveled. And even your extreme example of a pure is only level 99, most are far, far lower.

Pures are low levels, and hating pures just because a few of us suck is a how racism is born. Sure, a vast bunch of us spend our time in PVP worlds yelling "safer noob, GF NUB, LOL 09 PROD, LOL SW PROD, LOL SOME RANDOM PROD HERE", but that doesnt mean you should hate all pures, we have just as much entitlement to our fun as every other low leveled account.

Yea its an unfortunate system, but thats the price we pay for jagex cracking down on RWT.

I do the same thing, but i still ask questions Guides arent always the best, and lots of guides consider nothing but pure efficiency, not how fun it is, not how much it costs, etc.

No it wouldnt, theres simply not enough worlds to make everyone happy. Not only that, with 100 worlds to choose from, even if there WERE enough worlds, it would often take so long to find the spot that by the time you found it you would have stopped playing anyway. Places like yews, coal, green dragons, blue dragons, fleshies, lessers, avansies, iron, it just wouldnt work. And then theres those level 30's who think it would be cool to range a blue dragon, even though each one takes like 5000000 hours to kill. Should those noobs really zero off a whole world just because they are to stupid to hunt somewhere better?

This. I need money for my effin runes, but noooooo take all of it and do... Nothing?

Fail plastic surgery look.

Whoa. Great arguments there, this is a skill, not some minigame item.

You can get a godsword before you get 75 attack. You CANNOT get a chaotic weapon before you get 80 dung, its simply not possible at the moment, you need AT LEAST ~80 dung to get a chaotic weapon. In an godswords case, getting the weapon is not dependant on the skill, in a chaotic weapons cause, getting the weapon IS dependant on the skill, and thus the only reward from dungeoneering is NOT the ability to wear it, but to actually get the item. You might acutally have a point if it were possible to get a CLS without dungeoneering, or if it were tradeable, but at the moment it isnt, and your comparison is very simplistic. This also makes spending XP lamps on dungeoneering borderline useless, because it doesnt give tokens, only XP, and as we all know dungeoneering XP is useless, only the tokens are actually worth anything.

I'm sure your being sarcastic, but getting runes back is easy, getting a CLS takes weeks, months even, dependant on how you train.

Thats because in a dungeon rush, combat levels are pretty much the only levels that matter, no one cares what you smithing level is, no one cares what your mining level is, no one cares what your crafting level is. People care what your combat level is. As i said, its unfortunate, but its true. I mean it should be balanced for low levels in general, not just pures, no need to talk down on pures though just because we have chosen to make our character a different way. Ive long accepted that, as a pure, everything, is harder for me. That being said, this compounded among dungeoneerings already unforgiving approach towards low levels really just adds insult to injury. Wait a second, didnt you make the "WAHHH IM A LOW LEVEL AND HIGH LEVELS STEAL MY SPOT!!!" thread? I don't see why your suddenly looking down on pures and low levels. It may be designed like this, but it isnt, combat skills matter more than anything else.

Far out, really? Why the hell are people complaining about mage being overpowered then, it still has very little KO potential because of the removal of spell stacking, with its only redeeming feature being cool effects like freezing.

Thats not the point. The point is that the rewards from a skill, say dungeoneering, should be a little more permanent. Its like losing the ability to cast ancients if you die with it. It shouldnt happen. But in dungeoneering's case, it does. You can potentially lose all your work up to level 80 dung just by dieing. No other skill is like that. At the moment dungeoneering is still more of a minigame than a skill. You could effectively rename mobilising armies into a skill and it would be just as much of a skill as dungeoneering is.

Maybe no one cared because no one has heard of this forum.

I'm pretty sure ice blitz + blood burst stacked.

That would suck, merchings a legitimate money making strategy, why should i be penalized for it :(

Hunter is click intensive by nature.

Yes, it has KO potential now. Is that a bad thing? Mage combos are also a luck thing. And yes, d bolts do get owned by antifires, but you always have other options (d bolts may as well be welfare, you cant expect much from it)

Oh yea, that would be bad. You PJED ME AND I LOST MY D CLAWS OMG YOU ARE SO DWEAD!!