Kimberly

Then if we're not making any assumptions and we're going solely off the video and the information provided there, it seems pretty justified. What you're saying isn't making sense to me.

Yup, it has to be the sword provided to you. Just got her now, didn't bring my own Korasi, used the one on the floor. No problem. Off to submit a bug report [garden tool]-hum

I've been stumped so far. Speccing when the screen starts to shake takes way more than it should (normal overworld consumption) instead of the smaller portion they did during the battle and vids that I see (like this one) Worse, the one spec I get off doesn't even stop her attack. And when that happens, I have almost 0 chance at salvaging the round. What's going on here that is making korasi fail? I know that if the spec was working properly as it should, I'd be able to kill the pest queen just fine, but until then I'm stuck. EDIT: I seem to hit the Pest Queen at some point while trying to get as high in Endurance as I can for the achievements, so simply formfitting doesn't help my problems in this case. EDITEDIT: Octarine pointed out that I'm still using the Korasi sword that I bring with me and not the one provided. Is this the root of my problems?

In that case then there should be no judging either way, which renders this whole discussion pointless :P

I'm confused: how did they suddenly develop electricity, photography, etc in such a short timespan? Still, I'm going to watch it. Set schedules hopefully mean no stupid filler episodes, so it will be even more enjoyable to watch. Huzzah. I like that airbending has survived, for one. But what about the bending technique revealed at the end of the last series? How is that going to play into this anti-bending revolt? I'm intrigued.

His laptop. His utilities. His software. His hard work. His name slandered because a teenage girl was being...a teenage girl (albeit spoiled). Traditional methods weren't working (he mentions grounding). In order to shock her enough to get the lessons through, a more drastic approach was taken. It was justified - all of it. If you don't agree with it, that's another thing entirely. Working to pay off the laptop or anything similar is frequently used as a way to build character. It teaches the individual the value of a dollar. Clearly, the girl is lacking that knowledge and the more conventional routes aren't working to enforce that, seeing as she's having such a difficulty with simple chores. As for the girl's work, you're right. But frankly, she wasn't working for NASA. I think she'll live. She's not going to be scarred for life just because she can't get on facebook. The video going viral IMO only enforces what the lesson was trying to bring home. Has this made her cry? Probably. Has this upset her? Probably. If none of these emotional reactions occurred, then the father has bigger problems to deal with. But if they had, they will be short-term. The child isn't being abused here. She was taught a lesson.

All you had to do was double-click on the embedded player to go to the youtube page...And you can adjust resolution from the embedded player, as well as go full screen.

If you reckoned the 'value' of f2p magic by the teleports, then you clearly didn't have much value in it to begin with. This is needed, considering f2p doesn't have tele tabs.

Okay, but that's not what you posted, just what you assumed. But...whatever. >_>' That's a good metaphor for it.

....I know?

What information are you looking for?

You don't like hunting?

Bronies... This is what ISE has come to?! I blame you Squab.

In both what happened here and the example you gave, the deal wasn't done because the funds didn't exchange hands. That point was never reached, because something happened before to prevent it - your friend broke your shit, a person abused a glitch to end the duel. There was a period of time where anything could have still happened...say the glitcher got two lucky hits and the TC hit zeros, or your seller backed out of the deal. How is that equivocation? How is that not a logical conclusion? Meh.

Losing potential profit = losing potential profit. If you had something you were going to sell for 200 bucks and a friend broke it, you lost the potential to earn 200 bucks. Logic. Pretty sure that's what everyone already said :P No one is disagreeing with you.

A wounded animal you say? *gets the shotgun* :smile:

The glitcher would have had to have two successful hits that totalled over 250lp in order to pull out the win, where the TC only had to hit once, most likely, to knock off the final 80-100lp. I can understand why the TC would feel like at that point, he *earned* his winnings. But Sy is right - the duel wasn't over, and you don't deserve the cash until the opponent is dead. It's annoying, and definitely a glitch, but not a loss.

I must've missed where it said that? Could you help me out :P

Small lamp yield: Today's SpinLists: 10k Small lamp (cooking) 1 feather Rune scimtar 50gp Huge Lamp (herblore) Medium Lamp (attack) Small Lamp (any) Lucky Bandos Tassets Lucky armadyl chainskirt Medium Lamp (ranged) 5 trout Huge Lamp (Constitution) Lucky Dragon 2h Medium Lamp (any) 1 bronze arrow Lucky Dragon Chainbody

In the FAQ it says that Lucky items are destroyed on death. They say they are identical stat-wise. They don't mention anything about whether they degrade or not.

I don't think what you were thinking translated to what you posted though. Because of the repeated mentioning of what you would need to "break even" in the timespan of what you repeatedly mentioned to be 3 harvests, it didn't make sense. Now that you explained it better, I see what you're saying.

But you're not guaranteed to get a bonus herb in 3 picks, so your conclusion is wrong and doesn't adequately explain the bonuses offered by the juju boost.

You would be correct if we're at say, day 3. We're...what, 5 hours into the update? If we're arguing for this update, as we both are, we have to at least be willing to admit that we're only hoping for it at this point to be true.

I don't know if it would have fixed the economy but I certainly agree that this wheel was a missed opportunity. It's kind of frustrating, really.

It's pretty common for a lot of different games though. Maybe after they review it for feedback, they will make lucky items be reclaimed somehow after like 3 months or so.