Adam007

Zez is a guy. To the topic, I'd say no. There's no reason for jagex to take the time programming an update for three people. They tend to not like to recognize the fact that they beat their game either.

People would abuse that option way too much. Just for being mean, you'd get shouts of "I'm reporting you for harrassment!!!" in every single possible situation, and I'd imagine those kind of reports would flood cs's reports they have to deal with. You just ignore those guys who out of nowhere start flaming you. They obviously have issues.

Sticky on this board: http://forum.tip.it/viewtopic.php?t=71 In short: hit print screen on the image you want, go to paint, hit paste, then host it however you want.

I'd first clear my debt to the friend by doing something you're guaranteed to make money without risk. Then to decide whether or not you want to pk, analyze the fact that you've been losing a lot lately, decide if you want to pk differently or not based on how much fun you have, and just factor in if losing things is worth it because you have a lot of fun, or if you'd rather be practical and less risky.

I used to be in that camp, but its happened twice to me now, so I'm sticking with the optimists from now on. Mind you, I try to be nice IRL too but I've yet to wake up and find the keys to a Porsche under my pillow :( , so maybe its strictly a Runscape thing? I don't think it's optimism. I just think that people naturally want to explain/make sense of why things happen, and it's easy in most cases to connect dots. In this case the connection is a good thing happening to karma, as if both events couldn't have occured separately on their own without any link. I kind of do sound pessimistic I guess though. :P

Yes, those two happenings were directly related, obviously attainable to karma. (Sorry, I'm in the http://forum.tip.it/viewtopic.php?t=458192 mindset about posting these things) Anyway, nice of you to be nice, and congrats on the good drop.

Teenagers can accept the same responsiblity, and some act like adults. I my best friend is basicly the man of the household at 16, he can take care of his sick family (3 siblings and his mother) and also tries to keep everything around the house neat and fixed, while still going to school and maintaining an 80% avarage. You think people like this arent capabable of being responsable? On the other hand, yes many teens can act like idiots and cannot handdle resonsiblities (but thats mostly due to how they act). A teenagers brain is run mainly on emotion, and very little rational thinking. Yes there are exceptions, and I don't know what stance you're taking, but we're talking about an age that groups the whole population into two categories. Special instances obviously have to be ignored - otherwise it's a big mess determining if someone has the mindset of an adult or not. That's your personal opinion based on experiences with people you have around that age - personally at my school there are plenty of 17 year olds that still don't have an ounce of common sense. 18 has always been that year of adulthood and fits fine with what we currently have.

Possibly you have a really good connection or him a bad one?

See, the point is there has to be a set age. And my question for you is why 13? If we have a set age for adult punishments, which is normally 18, it's an easy way to draw the line between child and adult. Otherwise the line is blurred and case by case it gets confusing. Obviously there has to be a line, because you can't try a two year old for murder if a gun is lying around, he picks it up, drops it, and somehow the gun goes off, shooting and killing someone. Not even that. Even if a two year old flat out shot a guy you still obviously can't put the 2 year old in jail, and I'm really surprised you can think that way indy - I'd love to hear you elaborate on the idea of it being right to charge a baby with murder and punish him/her accordingly. How do you expect a baby to exist in jail with no parents? People are different, brains, are different, so obviously a line has to be drawn, because it's impossible in younger cases to assume they had the right judgment or even knew what they were doing. Knowing that a line has to be drawn, the line was placed at 18 years old, which is give or take a good enough age. Yes, there will be some cases with 17 year olds who probably should have gotten adult punishment, and 19 year olds who might have deserved a child punishment, based on individual people. No system is perfect, but the system we have does as good a job as any.

It shouldn't really be that surprising, I don't get how you're all prejudging those two people based on a school picture and acting surprised they married - whether or not that's real doesn't really matter, but it shouldn't really be that surprising either way, and there's nothing really to talk about the picture. It's just an advertisement.

I love that game, I stopped playing it after about 3 weeks though. I hit 20 brain age and didn't want to mess that up, so I stopped doing those tests, and eventually it got too boring for me. I loved the graphs and comparing graphs with your family members though.

In: 7.5mil so I was charged 75k This was at 97% so I don't know if it's accurate enough for you, but I got: 29 herbs 128 mahogony 128 teak I had herbs at 50% and rare woods at 100% Second time: 75k charge still. 100% approval. 100% rare woods at only mahogony gave 223 mahogony 50% herbs gave 30 herbs.

Key word being ... almost. :P Just use the "these aren't the droids you're looking for" line. Works like a charm every time.

A few things. First, why complain? Look at it optimistically, you got an easy reward. Do those enough and you'll love not being attacked. Moreso though, how are you in any position to complain? You want a challenge? How about you choose hard difficulty instead of medium for a starter? I'm sure repeatedly doing those will be a challenge enough for you. Sounds to me like you did this once and got extremely lucky not getting attacked, generalized that it's always easy like that, then complaining since you left that you want an easy teleport back, which is available either through ancient magics or the ectophile and are close enough.

There's good enough evidence that those logs will be needed for carpentry/construction. My advice is get the fm xp if you need it, but otherwise glory tele to edge after each full load of logs, go through the abyss to the nature altar, and run to the logs to repeat the process from there.

How could a picture of a glitch with a timing problem show what the glitch is?

yes lmao, a little outdated :P Use it again! I miss not seeing any people with my work as their sigs/avatars. :) (Or have someone from the media board update it more. I don't have the time for that now, sorry).

Was this your avatar? If so I remember you.

That got the manatees mad, hence why they weren't able to make the real season fanale. :( (SP ref)

They're actually working on these kind of fixes now it appears, unlike how they used to. But just spell the word doesn't, like it's supposed to, not dosen't, and you won't have that problem. As to autoers, I think they mean that they'll be able to make better random events or things like that - not about people being able to deobfuscate or whatever they do with the code, so the autoers still might get hit hard from what's in store with the new engine.

Can anyone verify this crazy claim?

Not to be annoying, but how can anyone really quit if that's the case? If your premise is that quitting implies you'll never ever come back, you can never be sure that you've really quit, because a lot of people by chance get back into the game. In that case it would make more sense to just call it a long break, but then you can't use the word quit anymore since it can't ever apply... so just ignore this whole post because I went in a big circle and pretty much made no sense. ;)

I know it's happened already, but just don't freak out about things like that. Go with friends whenever you can, and your friends don't care if your mom says embarrassing things, really. Everybody's parents embarrass them. That's not worth not having a good time over. Don't skip out on social events just because you have a weird relationship with your mom. Talk to her, tell you how you feel, explain that she can trust you, and get all of those things ironed out so you can get back on track with having a normal social life without worrying about these kinds of things. If you keep declining offers to hang out with friends they'll eventually just stop calling.

It's easy to connect dots to make anything you want appear. Moreso those are just plain bad ideas though. The train of thought is so illogical. A president holds up three fingers so he's a devil worshipper? Not happening. The NATO symbol isn't at all shaped like a swastica. There are tons of totally flawed and warped ideas on that.

Kind of ironic isn't it? They do these "good deeds" for other people, but only out of selfish motivations. Yes they are still doing "good deeds," so that's cool and all but if they are doing it so they can "get something good back in return," then it's almost like they aren't truly doing a "good" deed in the first place. When I thought of it in my head, it sounded a lot better :? . Technically aren't the only actions people make 'selfish' though? Selfish automatically has a negative connotation and probably isn't the best word to use, but even when people help other people, they still have their own personal motivation, be it to feel better themselves indirectly by making other people feel better. People don't randomly do things - every action usually requires some type of personal motivation to do so. I think every good deed traces back to the motive of the deed-doer and is never 100% just to help someone, as negative as that sounds.