langer

You might want to have a familiar with an inventory to bank more herbs... T-birds, war tortoise, bull ants...

It's a matter of opinion when saying it's worth it or not. I also cannon them and always bring a familiar (war tortoise) to bank more and I usually bank when the familiar is near death, which is frequently when I run out of monkfish.

Not really, if you bank all herbs worth more than 1K, you should be making a better profit using food and doing your tasks in more trips. If you have a slayer ring, banking time becomes a non variable in your xp rates. People say you get more ranarrs than you use prayer potions at specters which is true, but what they fail to mention is that you would make more cash banking than staying the whole task only keeping high value herbs and other drops.

From my experience as a slayer, these are the monsters (from the shilo master) that drop the most blue charms: - Dark beast (looks like you don't have the requirement) - Gargoyles ( same as dark beasts) - Aberrant Specters (lots of banking involved if you plan on banking all herbs worth more than 1K)

Seek professional help if something like this pisses you off because like it or not, publicity is like that everywhere.

This is a game mostly played by kids and teens. This behavior should be expected. Ohhh and by the way, welcome to the internet where you can express your opinions without taking an I.Q. test.

It will happen in the next 5-7 years especially if low xp skills like agility, RC and slayer get upgraded. In fact, any upgrade to the general equipment set-up for slayer will result in better xp per hour. With the latest run update, both agility and RC have been given a boost regarding xp per hour. If it's not Gert or Aasiwat getting it done, it's gonna be someone else, but I'm pretty sure it will happen. There is nothing that indicates that RS will not be here for another 5-7 years and even with 30% decrease in the player base per year, there would still be 25K players online at the same time in 5 years, which would be enough for Jagex to maintain a pretty stable game with fewer servers and updates.

Most people are fundamentally bad and need incentives to act in a good way. Punishments will keep people from acting bad, with the lack of punishment over the Internet, nothing will stear someone on the right track except that person's conscience and this is not a skill most people train.

From my point of view, Jagex are doing a pretty decent job. Great move on their part to mute or black mark someone who cheats. Trade limits are a nice way to keep the game fair for everyone, no more easy money for newcomers or "friends". Your rant would hold more power if it had suggestions. What I see are the dellusions of a whinner who doesn't have a clue why some decisions were made.

I can tell you right away that I would be a very poor mod. I like to give training advices and quest help, but only when the player understands right away. My general response when I get asked question is often to redirect to tip.it's by saying : search the web for a quest guide, or something along those lines. My gameplay is not focused on clans and interactions, a flow of questions would probably make me go mad. There are many more dedicated person who would make better mods, but I would certainly fit the mould of those who wouldn't care about having a crown or not, because it would not change the way I behave in RS.

I wanted to reply a couple days ago but I didn't have sufficient time and I wanted to make sure I had read everything so I didn't look like a fool. In light of the recent change from Jagex in their strategy of enlisting pmods, I have to give props to Jr for a couple things. First thing, there is no denying that he hit it scare on the button when he said the selecting process was flawed, as Jagex would not have changed it and, more importantly, made a public statement about it. This means the selecting process was not perfect and Jagex were getting some bad apples. Starting from this, we can't get an accurate % of good mods vs bad mods though. Saying all or the majority of mods are bad is speculation and still generalising from a few cases. I have to say this new policy is something I look forward to, if it can get rid of those mods who got their modship for the crown and status only. Seeing as people like to be recognised and different, you are bound to encounter some pmods with bad attitude (much like in the real world with some police officers or job managers). I'm still not supporting this debate 100%, because the opening post shows an extreme view on the subject, but I have no doubt that these cases happen more often than the community would like.

If the law of supply and demand makes the price go below alch price, it should be allowed to go below the alch price. Otherwise, the result is the item becoming completely unsellable. And how do your prevent RWT then if you can sell drag med for 40K to someone who will alch them for 60K?

I agree that getting a 99 is not easy, but in comparison to other skills, fletching is indeed one of the easy 99. Or should I say less time consumming, less clicking and less dangerous.

An tiem currently cannot be under 300 gp of its alching price, not 250. Trust me I bought countless dragon meds at 59700 GP. It would not be a very reliable way to RWT, but with over 100 alchable items over 1k, it would be pretty easy to spot one for a quick trade. I know it would not be as fast as before the trade limits, but RWTers would probably do it.

I hope this time around you don't get called a nerd... I remember the last thread you reveal the meaning of your name, some kid had to spoil that.

Also carry a specing weapon (drag mace is good because of crush, but if you have the means, SGS is the ultimate specing weapon at waterfiends - set on crush obviously)

I don't understand what is the big deal though... Runes are buyable at 1 gp over the G.E. cap in stores instantly. I mean unless you are buying 1 mil+ runes, this would not be a huge investment for an instant buy. What they could do is add a feature that tells you the shop price so you know when it's time to go to the store instead. As for the alchables, this is to prevent people from scamming noobs by buying alchables way under the alch price and make a profit through hi alch. This is also to prevent RWT, someone smithing things to sell them to a RWTer that would eventually hi alch it for a profit.

I debated in this thread when it started and I'm gonna state back what I thought was right and still is today concerning Jr's statements. Your first claim is a generalization of all mods. It might be true for some, but it is not for all. Therefore, your statements is somewhat false. It could be true, but it would be nearly impossible to prove. Your second claim is based on your opinion that reporting rule-breakers is fun and not honorable. We have different opinions on this and based on mine, reporting is fine and keeps the game in a better shape, while yours dictates that this keeps players in a state of fear (I don't think it's that bad if the game is cleaner due to this). Your third claim is also based on a generalization. Not all mods are attention seeking players. In my experience, it's not a problem, though I rarely pay attention to the public chat. Your fourth claim is also a generalization. It does not apply to every mod. If you have indeed been muted eveytime you asked this to a mod, I would really want to see the proof and a ratio of occurence vs mute to believe that your claim is accurate for your personnal experience. Your fifth claim is also a generalization. It does not apply to every mod, but I have to admit that a mod doing that should have his status removed. Ever thought about reporting them? Your sixth claim is probably true and I have no problem in supporting it. Any mod saying otherwise is dellusional.

Get ready for the flame war when the winners are announced. "My video was much cooler!" "Jagex are fails" etc...

Yes I remember that argument pretty well and it might shock you, but I don't care that someone I don't know over the internet doesn't like me. I was just making a point that whatever people post in this thread as numbers will be guesses and probably nowhere near the truth. It's as if I asked you how many quarters from 1972 are there in the world as we speak, without knowing how many were made... Of course my numbers are unreasonnable, but your numbers are probably way off too.

um...wth? 2 blue phats? then why would they be worth less than christmas cracker? 412 white phats is also a little extreme...im guessing Christmas Crackers - 25-50 Purple Partyhat - 400-600 Green Partyhat - 350-450 Yellow Partyhats - 350-450 Red Partyhats - 300-400 White Partyhats - 200-300 Blue Partyhats - 150-250 My guesses are worth as much as yours, not much.

I went back to see the opening post and the lvl 3 vs 138 debate is relevant to the thread as it exposes the relative power of defence seeing from both extremes. If we were to follow the OP's logic, we would base our opinions on one occurence and claim everything should be changed because somethig happened once. As far as I know, someone fighting with a whip at 75 attack, super potted, using piety with defender and the usual pvp fighting gears (let's say rune for mid to high levels)... against a player wearing the same outfit super potted and piety and 75 def should strike a hit about 45-50% of the time and about 35-40% against someone wearing barrows. So during a fight that lasts 20 hits, wearing higher defence armor will probably make your opponent splash 2-3 hits more than wearing mid defence armor. To this day, only the spirit shield have give the opportunity to affect your opponents attack (through defence bonuses) and str (through the reducing damage effect).

I made them up. This has no discussion value as no one not working at Jagex could have the exact numbers.

If its fun to make new accounts, its hardly a waste of time. Infact if it were funner for you to make more accounts, it would be a waste of time to not make a new account because you wouldn't be having as much fun. Fun is subjective, we can't really debate what's fun for others. Having fun playing a different style of gaming is a matter of personnal choices and should not be debated. Debating the behaviors of a certain type of players is more or less generalizing the entire population from a biased sample.

where was this written :shock: :shock: :shock: its jst too good to be true haha I think this is still at the rumor stage.