Jump to content

Do your views contradict?


warri0r45

Recommended Posts

take this test to find out -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

test

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The higher the percentage you score at the end, the more your views contradict when given certain situations.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

When i took this test, i was surprised, i scored 60%(above average), although i believe i have reasons for this.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

what do you score?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tension Quotient = 0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7464 of the 108351 people who have completed this activity also have no tensions in their belief system.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There are a number of possible explanations for the fact that you have no tensions in your beliefs:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1. You have a very consistent set of beliefs;

 

 

 

2. You have very few beliefs - and consequently answered none or only a few of the questions!

 

 

 

3. You've done this test before!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Well I've not done the test before but I am pretty clear with my beliefs as people who have has discussions with me will know. ^_^

612d9da508.png

Mercifull.png

Mercifull <3 Suzi

"We don't want players to be able to buy their way to success in RuneScape. If we let players start doing this, it devalues RuneScape for others. We feel your status in real-life shouldn't affect your ability to be successful in RuneScape" Jagex 01/04/01 - 02/03/12

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13%. Is that good or bad? I don't even understand what it means lol.
the lower the percentage the better really. it means you don't have contradicting beliefs.

612d9da508.png

Mercifull.png

Mercifull <3 Suzi

"We don't want players to be able to buy their way to success in RuneScape. If we let players start doing this, it devalues RuneScape for others. We feel your status in real-life shouldn't affect your ability to be successful in RuneScape" Jagex 01/04/01 - 02/03/12

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7% - it believes I contradicted myself on the question about art being taste and Michelangelo being one of history's finest artists. I contend that I was just answering that question according to whether he is one of the artists I think was one of the greatest to have existed.

Some people are changed by being a moderator. I wouldn't be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47%

JfvHV.png

798M9.png

"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." - Samuel Adams

My new site. [bETA]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had 3 tensions in my result, and I only agreed with one of them. The other two were wrong interpretations by the site.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The one I agreed with was a tension because I misread the question :P

summerpngwy6.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That test misinterpreted my answers in order to fit the criteria of a contradiction when one wasn't there. I hardly think that 'agree' and 'disagree' is enough for someone to understand the reasoning behind my thoughts.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I agree. I got 3 contradictions on that test and none of them were actually real contradictions, simply misunderstandings by the site. I think a simple "agree" and "disagree" option isn't enough to really understand your thoughts and so make an assumption of a contradiction.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Based on those contradictions, I got 33%.

"Da mihi castitatem et continentam, sed noli modo"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7% - it believes I contradicted myself on the question about art being taste and Michelangelo being one of history's finest artists. I contend that I was just answering that question according to whether he is one of the artists I think was one of the greatest to have existed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yep, exactly the same for me.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Just like the political tests, these only have disagree/agree questions, and therefore the results should be taken with a grain of salt. Not all the questions could be answered by just a disagree or agree.

q8tsigindy500fan.jpg

indy500fanan9.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7% - it believes I contradicted myself on the question about art being taste and Michelangelo being one of history's finest artists. I contend that I was just answering that question according to whether he is one of the artists I think was one of the greatest to have existed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exactly what I got. I answered the question by my own opinion, not because I believe in "objective art standards."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I said that art is subjective and that Michaelangelo was one of the best artists, seeing as I think he is :(

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OT.: they can test alternative and complementary medicine to be save and efficient no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27% contradiction. Some of them are a bit weird.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You agreed that:

 

 

 

Severe brain-damage can rob a person of all consciousness and selfhood

 

 

 

And also that:

 

 

 

On bodily death, a person continues to exist in a non-physical form

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And I read the second one wrong.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You agreed that:

 

 

 

The environment should not be damaged unnecessarily in the pursuit of human ends

 

 

 

But disagreed that:

 

 

 

People should not journey by car if they can walk, cycle or take a train instead

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I thought it was like, people should not journey by car if they can walk. They should cycle or take a train instead. So no walking at all.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And well, this one.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You agreed that:

 

 

 

There exists an all-powerful, loving and good God

 

 

 

And also that:

 

 

 

To allow an innocent child to suffer needlessly when one could easily prevent it is morally reprehensible

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Found it a little bit weird as well. What does me believing in all loving God and an innocent child/or w/e human being (innocent or not) suffering have to do with each other. Surely, this God could prevent it. But that wasn't the question. It was the question weither I thought it was morally wrong or not.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And yea, the last one was just stupid.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You agreed that:

 

 

 

Having made a choice, it is always possible that one might have chosen otherwise

 

 

 

And also that:

 

 

 

The future is fixed, how one's life unfolds is a matter of destiny

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But still it is weird. I mean, I have chosen both answers. But now I would have chosen otherwise. So, it was destiny that I chose it at the time, but now that I look back to it I might have chosen otherwise. Or not?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ah well, what should I care. A little bit of contradiction is healthy anyway.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Am I the only one that art isn't subjective pers̮̩̉̉?:P

21o4pav.jpg

Signature by Maurice Sendak

When the stars make you drool just like a pasta fazool, that's amore!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.