monkeypie10 Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 This quiz will show how many worlds are needed to support your life-style, it's quite cool. http://www.myfootprint.org/ Mine is 5 worlds. Edit 3.7 worlds. Eating vegatarian twice a week now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Continuum Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 HA! Beat you! I need 4.5 planets! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Despaxes Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 1.2 planets. i suppose without being a friggen health nut activist living in the woods im doing pretty good haha my footprint is 5, as opposed to the average american 24 thanks everyone for the sigs! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celt23 Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 3.2 planets Footprint 14 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knives669 Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 3.9. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devilsdragon Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 6.1 woo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackalope14 Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 I'm not very environmentally friendly to tell you the truth. 5.3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctp080188 Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 3.2. Lol I don't have money for car or public transport, and yeah my house can't pay bills so don't use electricity unless absolutely necessary, gas never turned on due to bills lol. If I had more money I'd probably be less ecologically friendly. SHH HUT YUH MUH. DERKHED. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barihawk Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 2.4 acres, but it will probably go up once I graduate. My heart is broken by the terrible loss I have sustained in my old friends and companions and my poor soldiers. Believe me, nothing except a battle lost can be half so melancholy as a battle won. -Sir Arthur Wellesley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indy500fan Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 6.7 planets, 30 acres footprint. I commute a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Star_Fox Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 4.4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xXru1n3dXx Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Am I missing something? The link directs me to an eye-surgery website. RS Stats | BF2 Stats | ARSCV | LastFM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parabola Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 2.1 planets. There are some stupid questions though, like when it asks how far you travel by car the lowest option is 0km, then the next one is 25-100km. Numbers exist between 0 & 25 you clever site designer - and I happen to travel between 0 & 25km per week in a car. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lawrencekill Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Am I missing something? The link directs me to an eye-surgery website. Yes? Foot is 10 and 2.2 planets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Militaris Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Done one of these things once before, it was so bad. You could tell that it was made by hard-core socialists with a agenda. Much better then the first one I did. But still stupid and a waste of time. I need 6.9 global hectares. If everyone was like me we would need 3.8 planets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jemathonical Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 3.2 I think thats average ^Sir Jem 05-The Bunny Drinking Blog?^ Click it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
____ Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 CATEGORY GLOBAL HECTARES FOOD 4.2 MOBILITY 0.5 SHELTER 0.3 GOODS/SERVICES 0.8 TOTAL FOOTPRINT 5.8 IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 7.6 GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON. WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 1.8 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON. IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 3.2 PLANETS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foolgool Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Curse me for living in the suburbs.. 7.4 The code in my sig should say 1032 not 0132. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bubsa Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Oh my... Let's just say, a LOT >.< This is how much you all raised for charity. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue_Eggz Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 I think like 8.9 or 6.2 is that bad? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragen Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Mines the best so far I think :D Only 3.5 hectares and 1.9 planets. Thanks Venomai for this super sig and Kwimbob for the awesome avatar! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monkeypie10 Posted February 28, 2007 Author Share Posted February 28, 2007 As a personal goal, I'm trying to get from +5 to -3. It's really hard to lower your eco-footprint in this country. No public transportation, no recycling, no energy efficent systems either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manato0 Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 2.8 planets. That's it, I'm getting a more gas guzzling car. ...............___@@@ ___-----weeewoooweeewoooo......____//_____?___\\__ ___----,o-----GrammarPolice ----@)----`----(@)=========(@)- `Skiller: Maurdin, Black(omgracist) pure: Alotofnoobs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Militaris Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 I did the test again, but this time I was a complete hippy. I traveled everywhere on foot, use no eletricity, only eat locally grown herbs and beans ect.... Had 7+ fellow hippies living in my small environmentally friendly hippy house. This was the result My foot print was 0.6, and if everyone lived like a complete hippy we would need 1 planet. So pretty much according to this test if we want to be able to live on 1 planet we would have to go back to the pre-industrial age and do not use any technology. The funny thing is, that back then famines ect were relatively common and the population was significantly lower and the average age was less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caxis Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 FOOD 1.6 MOBILITY 0 SHELTER 0.5 GOODS/SERVICES 0.4 TOTAL FOOTPRINT 2.5 IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 8.8 GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON. WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 1.8 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON. IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 1.4 PLANETS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now