Bigfoot?

Okay, so I'm pretty much apathetic when it comes to bigfoot, but I read something on some blog that linked to some newspaper yada yada, you know how that goes. Anyways, apparently someone's captured a real live, well actually dead, bigfoot. It's going to be DNA tested and such, and will be done Friday. At the end of this I'll post the link so that you guys can read it and watch the youtube videos too. I'm interested to see how all of this data will turn up. What do the rest of you guys think that it is? And please, I'm not looking for "BIG FOOT IS A BIG FAKE" comments without having even looked at the article. =/ Being a little open-minded never hurt anyone, eh? =P

http://blogs.wncn.info/betweenthelines/ ... -big-hoax/

what exactly are they DNA testing it for? To see how closely related to humans it is?

Btw it looks like a ton of different types of meat :-k

Bigfoot, Montauk Monster, and This thing.

Just another list of obscure animals found across the globe.

Bigfoot, Montauk Monster, and This thing.

 

 

 

Just another list of obscure animals found across the globe.

the montauk monster looked like a dog sewn to na pig or something, and that other thing looked like some seaweed and a log. This looks a little bit more realistic, yet still looks like a bunch of chopped meat

that russian thing looks like a giant sea horse. :o

Nessie > Bigfoot.

Actually having an open mind would make your brain fall out. So yes, it does hurt everyone.

Anyways, I sort of believe in a "big foot" and Lochness Monster, sure. I just think they're undiscovered species related to dinosaurs or apes that live deep in the jungle or underwater where humans can't normally go. Hence why they're undiscovered. ;)

Actually having an open mind would make your brain fall out. So yes, it does hurt everyone.

 

 

 

Anyways, I sort of believe in a "big foot" and Lochness Monster, sure. I just think they're undiscovered species related to dinosaurs or apes that live deep in the jungle or underwater where humans can't normally go. Hence why they're undiscovered. ;)

mind...not head :wall:

Anyone Snopes it?

Nah, that article just came out today, so I haven't done anything with it yet.

I'll check on it tomorrow, though.

lol that's cool, but yea i think it's another undiscovered species

Did anyone else notice Bigfoot was wearing shoes in the video footage? Right as he passes behind the log and turn around. He lifts up both feet and you can see shoes.

Did anyone else notice Bigfoot was wearing shoes in the video footage? Right as he passes behind the log and turn around. He lifts up both feet and you can see shoes.

it can be just his feet/paws with snow under them... all you really see is the white 'sole'

and btw, it looks too humanly in the movie

Did anyone else notice Bigfoot was wearing shoes in the video footage? Right as he passes behind the log and turn around. He lifts up both feet and you can see shoes.

 

 

 

it can be just his feet/paws with snow under them... all you really see is the white 'sole'

 

 

 

and btw, it looks too humanly in the movie

Yeah. There looks to be a seam too where the top and bottom part of the costume connect. Walks very humanly too like a man hunched over because of a heavy costume.

The russian monster looks much more convincing.

I flat out refuse to believe or even seriously consider any more amateur-taken grainy shots of "bigfoot". They pop up every year or so and always turn out to be false/a costume made by 2 bored, unemployed guys who wanted to earn a quick buck by shocking others.

Maybe if it was some researcher from an university or overseas professor from Japan etc.. But just "some guy".. Nah.

The photo is interesting but I don't believe it's real. At least not until we have concrete evidence to determine what it is and to eliminate the possibility of a hoax.

Photo looks too fake to be real.

In this case, I think its just some idiots looking for attention.

Well, we'll know tomorrow, right?

But what kind of DNA testing can they do? Just test to make sure it isn't really just a pile of beef steaks?

Fake, fake fake.

To me, the most convincing sighting was this, forget Bigfoot, witches spotted in Mexico!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNbe0YWXUuc

Actually having an open mind would make your brain fall out. So yes, it does hurt everyone.

 

 

 

Anyways, I sort of believe in a "big foot" and Lochness Monster, sure. I just think they're undiscovered species related to dinosaurs or apes that live deep in the jungle or underwater where humans can't normally go. Hence why they're undiscovered. ;)

Ever heard of champ??

The russian monster looks much more convincing.

 

 

 

I flat out refuse to believe or even seriously consider any more amateur-taken grainy shots of "bigfoot". They pop up every year or so and always turn out to be false/a costume made by 2 bored, unemployed guys who wanted to earn a quick buck by shocking others.

 

 

 

Maybe if it was some researcher from an university or overseas professor from Japan etc.. But just "some guy".. Nah.

Yeah, I love how researchers and professors in this field may search for years for these creatures but to no conclusive results, while some guy goes camping or walking along the beach for a day and comes back with a revolutionary discovery. Every time someone discovers something it's either a grainy, unconclusive picture/video or a blatantly obvious fake. I can't imagine how frustrated the researchers are. I'm sure some problem will occur during the DNA test, such as a theif stealing the Bigfoot like they did for the Montauk Monster, or some other crazy postponement that leaves monster enthuisiasts on the most frustrating cliffhanger for ages.

Well, we'll know tomorrow, right?

 

 

 

But what kind of DNA testing can they do? Just test to make sure it isn't really just a pile of beef steaks?

Obviously they can't determine if it's a "bigfoot" because they have no basis for comparison, but they can see if it's obviously manufactured DNA or the DNA of another organism. Depending on how much analysis they do, there are a few markers you'd expect to find if it's real mammalian DNA of a yet undiscovered species.

I'd suspect if it's a real find they'd try and piece it into some historical context and ask the question of what it's derived from/related to.

Still, somehow I doubt that this is anything significant.

Here's the original story, which includes a higher quality and larger image:

http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-ne ... rilla-pic/

I'm not convinced.

Anyone have any info on the DNA testing?

I think they said they'd release it in a press conference... which was supposed to be today. Maybe a postponement as I predicted. I hate how so far every bit of evidence for monsters is either fake or unconclusive -.-