Celt23

Spiritual proof has only been decreasing, whereas scientific proof (as in microorganisms) has only been increasing.

No you aren't disensitized, I agree on you on that teacher being a bit overreactive.

9/10 Those are fun, I've made 'LOL' in on the minimap the same way.

3/10 I think

Even better!

I have cougars here, alot more dagerous if met in a dark alley. Your best bet is to make alot of noise. With bears you can make alot of noise and play dead.

Oky doky then. I sure can't see it.

That's exactly what this debate involves. So there was gods in ponds and trees back then? No. Just like I doubt there's a god ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Ã

We can see Atheists, and observe them, talk to them ect. But where's God? A long time ago we used to think gods lived in trees, ponds ect but we started exploring our surroundings and then began to think the gods lived on mountains. Then we began to explore the mountains and found no gods. Then we started believing they lived in the sky, but our knowledge grew and found that preposterous. Now we got space probes poking around the far reaches of the solar system, and now think God is way out there. Now we got telescopes looking at distant superclusters and quasars 13 billion light years away (which disproves young earth), and are smart enough to know that there's no gods. Simply put: we cannot observe God, it's highly unlikely that such a being exists.

First: 11.341 Second: 17.343 I didn't get or find any "animal" test thing.

http://www.momupload.com I've used that place to store files for a while. On very huge 20 MB + files it doesn't seem to want to upload though.

4/10

I wasn't responding to your post. And I agree to some extent.

Oh, that would be cool. But hold that off for the moment because I want cloning, stem-cell research and every other thing that ticks off the far Right first. There's nothing morally wrong with it. We need to move on, people. Cloning and test tube babies are the wave of the future!

8/10

So simple yet so powerful, 7.5/10

Yer, he was a carpenter. Was pretty wealthy from what I've heard. And without a doubt started preaching and such, and formed a cult which a few hundred years later became the main religion of the Roman Empire, then became unpopular (except in the Byzantine Empire) in the Dark Ages and then revived and became the main religion of Europe and spread around the world through exploration and missionaries. I'd say it's a case of extreme luck that it became the world's biggest religion.

Are you in the US? UK? Australia? I might be able to guess what it is. If US then it was probably a coyote or bobcat. If UK it was probably a fox, weasle (not sure about weasle) or stray dog that hisses or something new. If Aus then it might of been a Tasmanian devil, Queensland tiger or Thylacine. I highly doubt it was a yowie or bigfoot or what-not:

To attract members. at Par 2: He's also called 'The Deciever' for a reason. :twisted: :evil: :P

^^ Both of you, that's why pault's threads are fun to read. No need to point out such things in an economic thread, or the 9/11 one for that matter. I agree with the other parts to an extent.

I definitely would do something like that if I had a choice. I did extra biology and science in elementery. I did some essays on nautiluses and herrerasauroids.

I also miss the Gopher protocol. It was so cool way back when. (it was a precursor to the modern web)

Lol. I saw some sites about to severly discipline your kids, by beating them up and such. But, of course, it's for humor only so don't take it too seriously. I edited it a bit. >>>If you have seizure problems don't stare at this<<<

b7ubh75f Bub 75 15 is my translation typed with an empty playing card pack.

7/10