All_Is_Great

But dungeoneering has the same mechanics from 1-60 just as from 60-99, 99-120. You learn the basics of dungeoneering at the early levels, so why can't they have an opinion? Even if they don't know all the tricks to keying/ rushing floors in 30 minutes, what gives you the right to say they can't dislike the skill? You don't scratch the surface at level 60, you learn the basics that are key throughout your dungeoneering career, which I'd say is damn important. That's hardly akin to 30 seconds of a movie.

Nope. They don't know anything about the skill at level 60. If you have no knowledge of something, you can't reasonably have an opinion about it. Please, both of you, stop making me state the obvious. Oh dear god, I'm so sorry about that. How can I forget that you're obviously correct in your opinions God forbid anyone actually go through large floors 25- and learn what the skill is all about!!!! When did I state that 60 grants one intrinsic knowledge of the skill? I didn't say that. Congratulations -- you can read! Just kidding. Come back when you feel like constructing an actual argument. It takes a lot of experience to become a pro dungeoneer. The skill does not end at an absurdly low level like most other skills, and it changes quite drastically the higher level you are. Mining is almost exactly the same from level 1 to 99. Construction is almost exactly the same from level 1 to 99. Oh dear god, I'm so sorry about that. How could I forget that you're obviously correc- lol, just kidding, you're wrong, as per usual. So anyone who's not a "pro-dungeoneer" can't have an opinion on the skill? Then you probably shouldn't be mentioning the skill at all, nor me. I never said it takes 60 dg to become pro, rofl, can you read? Also, Leyenda, it's at 120 obviously, that's when you can get 4 binds! Makes dungeons go super fast. Sorry to ask, but were you going to attempt to argue at some point in this conversation? I was under the impression that you wanted to, so I took the time to respond appropriately. I'd appreciate it if you did the same. What I said: "Unless the person used TOG/penguins to that level, I'd say it's fair for them to dislike it" What you responded with: "No, you're wrong, I'm right. They don't know anything at 60, end of story." My point: "you don't need to be pro-dungeoneer to have an opinion on it" Your turn, please.

Nope. They don't know anything about the skill at level 60. If you have no knowledge of something, you can't reasonably have an opinion about it. Please, both of you, stop making me state the obvious. Oh dear god, I'm so sorry about that. How can I forget that you're obviously correct in your opinions and that once you hit level 60, you magically gain a whole new perspective on the whole skill! God forbid anyone actually go through large floors 25- and learn what the skill is all about!!!! When did I state that 60 grants one intrinsic knowledge of the skill? I didn't say that. Congratulations -- you can read! Just kidding. Come back when you feel like constructing an actual argument. It takes a lot of experience to become a pro dungeoneer. The skill does not end at an absurdly low level like most other skills, and it changes quite drastically the higher level you are. Mining is almost exactly the same from level 1 to 99. Construction is almost exactly the same from level 1 to 99. Oh dear god, I'm so sorry about that. How could I forget that you're obviously correc- lol, just kidding, you're wrong, as per usual. So anyone who's not a "pro-dungeoneer" can't have an opinion on the skill? Then you probably shouldn't be mentioning the skill at all, nor me. I never said it takes 60 dg to become pro, rofl, can you read? Also, Leyenda, it's at 120 obviously, that's when you can get 4 binds! Makes dungeons go super fast.

Nope. They don't know anything about the skill at level 60. If you have no knowledge of something, you can't reasonably have an opinion about it. Please, both of you, stop making me state the obvious. Oh dear god, I'm so sorry about that. How can I forget that you're obviously correct in your opinions and that once you hit level 60, you magically gain a whole new perspective on the whole skill! God forbid anyone actually go through large floors 25- and learn what the skill is all about!!!!

Unless the person used TOG/penguins to that level, I'd say it's fair for them to dislike it.

^ Hey look, let him play how he wants. Stop forcing the "right" way on everyone, regardless of how stupid this whole rant is.

You're right. Nobody should ever try to improve their characters or do things that benefit them, and safe PvP is OMG SO IMPORTANT. Let's get back on topic. Lol? So I can't disagree with you? We are on topic. Trololol. Stop making everything about disagreeing with efficiency. It's not related to the topic. Go troll the exclusive content thread. Lol'd. I never even mentioned efficiency. Read what I type, don't just assume. You can be efficient as you want, I don't even care, I'm just trying to put a little perspective from my view on why safe PVP is not as useless as you think. If that counts as trolling and anti-efficiency, then :lol:

You're right. Nobody should ever try to improve their characters or do things that benefit them, and safe PvP is OMG SO IMPORTANT. Let's get back on topic. Lol? So I can't disagree with you? We are on topic.

^ But whats the point of money if you don't spend it? And isn't spending it on dominating in safe PVP one of the best ways? I'm not trolling you, and I never even mentioned efficiency until you two brought that up. Also, when you kill monsters, and run into a dry streak, you don't feel good about yourself and you get frustrated. At least in safe PVP you feel good, no?

I'm not flaming you lol. I'm wondering why green has dismissed safe pvp as the least important. I don't agree with him, I think safe Pvp is very important. Minigames like castle wars which basically existed since the beginning of rs2 are constantly played by many people. And other safe pvp minigames were meant as a replacement (of sorts) for the old wilderness. I don't even know how that has to do with efficiency? I'm agreeing with what you say here.

And exactly why is that? Can we not bring efficiency into this thread? it's totally unrelated. When did i bring up efficiency?

And exactly why is that?

I'd say the ccbow is less useful than the maul and staff.

LOL, i did that too! Good times indeed.

Life must be very hard on you :) Way to quote out of context.

Oo nice! Ancient body looks really sweet, I got it from my first elite, it was only worth 400k at the time :lol: I just finished another elite and got 250k :thumbdown:

And by stupid I think you mean people who don't play the "right" way. :rolleyes:

Lol, the Rate This! forum is a joke. Also Blogscape is a joke too.

Veracs brassard kinda blows. Either use a proselyte top or a better barrow's top, like torag's or dharok's.

^ That doesn't make any sense. Runescape in itself is a waste of time, that's why I play it. Folding christmas ornaments isn't really a waste of time, unless you were forced to.

Ice warriors for golds at your level. Slayer is not a good choice at your level.

Yessir.

^ Yea, keep insulting everyone, that'll make you feel more justified in breaking rules. :rolleyes:

I had that thought in mind when making the topic. I was going to make this thread AGES ago but never bothered. I just wanted to ask if people shared the same experience as me. I didn't announce it all over the place FYI. Just in the 200M topic. I didnt even make an official blogscape blog. Your in the rants forum, why dont you make a rant about it? Make a rant about what?

[hide] Kim spawnlings = Kimlings? :P But yeah, I've heard that as well. Apparently the older Kim's health isn't great....and promoting someone to general is pretty big in NK since head of state is also head of the army if I recall correctly? Correct. And Kim Jong Il is believed to have cancer, heart problems, and failing kidneys, among other things. I guess he's pretty Il. [/hide] lol'd :lol: Anyways, I don't know if South Korea is actually in alliance with any of the big boys. BUT, if they do ever start a war, it'd be best to leave the two Koreas to duke it out alone, without the aid of foreign countries. I mean, they were one country before, and if the States didn't go half way across the world, they probably still be today. Why did the States get to station their troops south of 38 after 1945? Why do they have to put their nose in everything? Same to the Soviets. Just leave them alone for chrissakes.