Jehosaphat

I put once or twice a month, because school's starting. But I'll start coming to more soon. (Shows my priorities, right?)

Grats. I'll unspam in a few dozen hours once I hit the reqs to start and/or finish WGS. Blasted farming....

Pie no thread is complete without your witty remarks. :roll: Thank you. :D

*grabs box o' popcorn again* Time to watch more fighting! Yay! I'm not actually going to fight yet. Just watch and eat popcorn.

That's far east, not middle east. Lrn2geographyplz. Oh, and while you're at it, lrn2grammar and lrn2spell. I'd post something more relevant, but I can't understand any of your posts whatsoever.

That's hilarious.

What helm is this? From Seers Diary, Not sure if it's the 1st or the 2nd version 2nd version, 1st is bronze-ish, 2nd is silver, 3rd is gold.

If this is serious, ROFL, good luck. If this isn't serious, just ROFL.

GL on farming.

I blame my sister for my account name. Hers was Tinkerbel962, so once I lost my first acc due to scamming (that one's name was based off of a poster in my room, btw) she begged me to make a new account called "Peter Pan." So I did, and my brother's account continues the sequence of Peter Pan reference failures. My Tip.It acc name was just something random I thought up. That, and I was really hungry at the time...

there is already a ton more content that ur paying for that f2p doesnt have access to. so an update such as skillcapes for f2p isnt gonna hurt you or any other p2per. and lets be honest, no hardcore f2per should have to buy 1 month of membership and risk their credibility as 100% f2per for an 'article of clothing/achievement' that give no advantage to anyone anyways. p2pers who are against this are just 100% stubborn Yes, but if you give you a bit of that "ton" of content, then you're gonna want more, and more, and more.... I do think that F2P needs something where they can get 99 recognition without having to constantly go to Quick Chat, but not members' skillcapes. Give them a low-stat version of a skillcape, or maybe no-stat armor or something like that. I used to be a "hardcore" F2Per, then I got member's. I consider it more fun that F2P, thus, I continue playing it. But, for the sake of those too poor, too lazy and/or not allowed to have member's due to parental influence, well... see suggestion above. Also, there's no need for generalizations. I'm against F2P skillcapes, but not against F2P skill recognition. Choose your words carefully. Also, learn to use proper grammar.

And this is why this idea fails. Getting past 85 is a huge achievement in members, just not as much as F2P. If you say it isn't, here's a little math for you. There are approx. 1.9 million people on the Fletching highscores list. Less that 230,000 of those are higher than 85. There are over 2 million people who would qualify to be on the high scores for Firemaking. Less than 75,000 of those are higher than 85. Thus, mathematically, approximately less than 12.5% of members are above 85 in fletching, and only 3.75% of players have 85+ firemaking. If we made these capes F2P only, there would be outrage, not only from the mebers with stats over 85, but also from the members who are close to/aiming for 85+ in a skill. F2P should get skill capes or something like them, but not ones that are just F2P. Then all the members with 99 would quit so that they could get a cape that's "more special," or they'd quit because they can't get the cape because their 85+ is in a members' only skill.

Support. This is a great idea, and the layout has more possibilities for training than other skills already released. (Yes, I'm lookin' at YOU, Firemaking!)

That's a terrible suggestion, and it would never work. You think that they communicate only through RuneScape clan chats? Also, to do that to the people who run price manipulation clans is a bad solution. It'll just make a lot of people angry without fixing the problem. It'd probably turn out better if they just made the stupid clans and/or advertising for the stupid clans against the rules. Just get all the manipulators banned.

You got 90+ CB stats on otherworldly beings? Good for you. To put it simply, THE GAME EVOLVES. It changes with its audience as its audience calls for different things. They wanted faster training, they got it. Also, just ask the kid if he has any trimmed capes. If he doesn't just laugh at him. If he does, then... well.... bummer for you. Or you could take it the mature way and ask him why he's insecure enough to insult you over a game.

LOLZ U FAIL NERD GET OUTTA YOUR MOMS BASEMENT ^ That's what you'll get from about 90% of the RS population if you kill them, try to kill them, get killed by them, escape being killed by them, step within 3 feet of "their" tree, fire, rock, hellhound, whatever. I guess this rant is about that most people are SOMEWHAT intelligent (they've survived up to this point, right?) and yet they're stupid enough to not show it. Not that I PK, but my friend does heavily, and gets these sorts of remarks all the time when he kills people. Because everyone knows, all the stupid 10 year-old kids get 99 strength and pk :roll: Not all the stupid 10-year-olds go out and PK, but most of those PKing are stupid 10-year-olds. Notice I said "most."

Lol, you're gettin pwned by a midget XD

Yes. Too bad about the aquanite... I can't kill it yet. Isn't there any other four-legged magic-casting water creature? :cry: :? :P Someone could try wallasalkis. I would, but I haven't done Fur & Seek yet. Tnhat would be a great theory if it wasn't for the fact wallasalkis have no legs whatsoever and the clue clearly specific four legged Oh. #-o I've never been there, but I've heard of them - and the bestiary entry picture is from the front, where it looks like it may or may not have 4 legs.... It might be worth trying anyways though.

Yes. Too bad about the aquanite... I can't kill it yet. Isn't there any other four-legged magic-casting water creature? :cry: :? :P Someone could try wallasalkis. I would, but I haven't done Fur & Seek yet.

Apparently we have yet another class - drum roll please - the peacemakers ^^. And the wackos (ME!), and the uber-trolls, and the random stupid OMGUHASROONPL8 people. You're a troll (duh!) : Random stupid OMGUHASROONPL8 people are classed as "idiots". Honestly, trolls are the best. Lol, I wonder what happens when I get trolls as a slayer task.... am I allowed to suicide in the Wildy for slayer XP then? :lol: Really? I thought there was a difference between stupidity and idiocy.

Shoulda screenied the one I got ages ago of torag legs and guth body. Too bad they were essentially worthless at the time... And I still regret my second barrows trip - got Ahrim robeskirtthingo and sold it for the current price back then - 175k. #-o

Apparently we have yet another class - drum roll please - the peacemakers ^^. And the wackos (ME!), and the uber-trolls, and the random stupid OMGUHASROONPL8 people.

It's been like that since RS2, it was even included as a feature of agility in the agility guide, all of a sudden a few years later it's unfair? Do you ever think for yourself? Or do you simply trust every single thing Jagex ever says to you? Your teachers must love you. Since we decided to use pretty font options.... OF COURSE IT'S UNFAIR. WHO CARES IF IT WAS ALLOWED OR NOT, IT WAS STILL **** UNFAIR. IT WAS UNFAIR BEFORE THEY ADMITTED IT. IT WAS UNFAIR. Got it? -.- And yes, I think for myself. --- Removed the flames. There's no reason to join that which you cannot defeat. Err no they are NOT putting out regular content this year. Stop being delusional. They did all of these little fixes last year as well AND they put out regular content. This year has been horrible for new content so far. Okay, so I mis-grammared. Whoops! #-o My purpose in saying this is that with a few exceptions (2 if my count's right), we have been getting regular weekly updates, some with new content, some without. But we're still getting new stuff. Frankly, I'd rather they fix the messed-up stuff before they release the new. And I have been seeing that from some of your other posts as well. So which is your opinion? Fixes first, or new content first? And don't weasel out on this one with something nitpicky about 4 words I said. Also, in case you haven't noticed, I usually enter an argument a bit after it's started. Why? Because if someone can argue about Jagex failing for that long, you have to wonder why they haven't just given up and left.

You may want to reword that before someone decides to take it the wrong way. :-#

A bit of an off-topic question: Does anyone know if they even air that show in Canada? Because if they didn't, that would be really redundant. And if they did.... why do Canadians get the little blue happy people? I mean, they've already got Eskimos for crying out loud! [/offtopic] Frankly, I'm surprised I haven't really seen him do much flaming towards me. And if there was flaming, then I just took it as sarcasm and/or a joke. So... either I'm flame-proof or just really, really stupid. Watch, there'll be replies saying that I'm just stupid. :lol: