Wow

 

 

 

PS:

 

 

 

There's going to be an anti-fur[bleep] raid in rs, fally w86

 

 

 

 

 

9 PM GMT

 

 

 

Tbh, every Republican I know hate Oreilly. he's a liar "np sin zone, unless I make the spins" should be his motto. Please don't think we're all like O'reilly.

 

 

 

 

 

And Cadbury, if you're referring to the War on Iraq, lemme give you an example. There's a person walking down the street, (America) and see's a starving five year old homeless child, (Iraq) now, America could stop and feed the child, but it'd take a lot of money, and a lot of time, and if they didn't do something, the five year old, couldn't fend for herself, and eventually she'd die. Now sure, that's dumbing it down a lot, but that's pretty much how it is. Plus ,we went there to stop them from attacking us. And I don't give a crap if UK helps or not, but they should, because the middle east is targeting them also, so how about, you stay out of our business, and go back to your anti-USA riots.

Saru, you should understand that 99% of people who say things like that are lying to either try to get a reaction out of people, or just trying to fit in with all the other 4chan clones.

 

 

 

I'm not referring to your America argument with him, this thread isn't really a good place for that kind of thing anyway.

Today was a great day for the anons.

Apparently I'm 70% 4chan and I have no idea what 4chan is exactly to be honest other than just another place with crazy pictures. :|

Apparently I'm 70% 4chan and I have no idea what 4chan is exactly to be honest other than just another place with crazy pictures. :|

 

 

 

That is basically all it is. A crazy place with pictures... :?

Saru, you should understand that 99% of people who say things like that are lying to either try to get a reaction out of people, or just trying to fit in with all the other 4chan clones.

 

 

 

I'm not referring to your America argument with him, this thread isn't really a good place for that kind of thing anyway.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yea, I know. :P

 

 

 

 

 

Mlbfan, you're a [developmentally delayed].

 

 

 

I mean Mlb, what'd you'd say if an anon hacked obama's email? You'd have a fit.

No no no :( See, he wants you to argue with him. He wouldn't act like the way he does unless he liked the reactions it gets.

I mean Mlb, what'd you'd say if an anon hacked obama's email? You'd have a fit.

 

No, MLB is a conservative. :roll:

Plus ,we went there to stop them from attacking us. And I don't give a crap if UK helps or not, but they should, because the middle east is targeting them also, so how about, you stay out of our business, and go back to your anti-USA riots.

 

 

 

No, please do entertain. Would Iraq used one of it's 20 old-soviet era jets and flown over the pacific? Their 1 submarine and load it with commandos? Al-Qaida and other radical militants don't even operate air vehicles, so I'd like to know how are a bunch of extremists going to "attack" a country thousands of miles away over a sea.

 

 

 

It wasn't an attack against the 19 Saudi Arabians who flew planes into american buildings... It was an attack against a weaker, oil-rich nation that had nothing to do with 9/11 or providing safe harbor to militants (which Saddam viewed as a threat to his own national security and power).

Some lawyer lady is being proclaimed by /b/ as an "honorary /b/tard" for beating Bill O'Reilly in a debate on tv. It was rather interesting to watch, its all over youtube.

 

 

 

But honorary /b/tard? Can someone define that? Last time I checked, /b/tards were anything but lawyers who could defeat a news figure in a debate. She is way better than anyone on /b/ could have done. I love how /b/ is placing themselves above everyone more successful than them, crowning only the most worthy as a part of them.

Plus ,we went there to stop them from attacking us. And I don't give a crap if UK helps or not, but they should, because the middle east is targeting them also, so how about, you stay out of our business, and go back to your anti-USA riots.

 

 

 

No, please do entertain. Would Iraq used one of it's 20 old-soviet era jets and flown over the pacific? Their 1 submarine and load it with commandos? Al-Qaida and other radical militants don't even operate air vehicles, so I'd like to know how are a bunch of extremists going to "attack" a country thousands of miles away over a sea.

 

 

 

It wasn't an attack against the 19 Saudi Arabians who flew planes into american buildings... It was an attack against a weaker, oil-rich nation that had nothing to do with 9/11 or providing safe harbor to militants (which Saddam viewed as a threat to his own national security and power).

 

 

 

 

 

Well they are, just a lot of people don't know about it, it's small things, but it's happening all over UK. I only know about it cause my dad's a reporter and has connections there.

 

 

 

And sorry if I came off a bit harsh about anything I posted last night, I was really cranky lol. :(

Some lawyer lady is being proclaimed by /b/ as an "honorary /b/tard" for beating Bill O'Reilly in a debate on tv. It was rather interesting to watch, its all over youtube.

 

 

 

But honorary /b/tard? Can someone define that? Last time I checked, /b/tards were anything but lawyers who could defeat a news figure in a debate. She is way better than anyone on /b/ could have done. I love how /b/ is placing themselves above everyone more successful than them, crowning only the most worthy as a part of them.

 

 

 

 

 

Being an honorary /b/tard means you've done something that /b/ would have loved to do, or beat one of /b/s enemies. And no, we dont place ourselves above others. Thats only the new[bleep]s who force memes that do that.

Being an honorary /b/tard means you've done something that /b/ would have loved to do, or beat one of /b/s enemies. And no, we dont place ourselves above others. Thats only the new[bleep]s who force memes that do that.

 

No, sir, you are the new[bleep]s.

Being an honorary /b/tard means you've done something that /b/ would have loved to do, or beat one of /b/s enemies. And no, we dont place ourselves above others. Thats only the new[bleep]s who force memes that do that.

 

No, sir, you are the new[bleep]s.

 

Are this even gramaticaly correct?

 

 

 

Still, I occasionally just look around /b/, maybe /v/, I'm desensitized to this kind of stuff. Nothing good really came out of it though. It's good that 4chan exists though, it keeps such horrible drivel from spreading across the internets.

I was doing my homework in the library, and I looked over at the computers and some kid has this picture as his background. I was thinking to myself *mega-facepalm* :lol:

Ultimania, I would assume anyone who frequents /b/ is desensitized to most pictures.

 

 

 

I don't visit there much, but I had a question for someone who does. From what I've heard, "new[bleep]s" have taken over /b/ basically. Now, if they are the majority, why does the minority treat them like they don't belong? I mean, it seems like they are what keeps the board active at all.

 

If there's an obvious answer to this, sorry, I don't know much about this subject. I hope I can get a real response, not someone just saying a meme I don't understand at me.

Ultimania, I would assume anyone who frequents /b/ is desensitized to most pictures.

 

 

 

I don't visit there much, but I had a question for someone who does. From what I've heard, "new[bleep]s" have taken over /b/ basically. Now, if they are the majority, why does the minority treat them like they don't belong? I mean, it seems like they are what keeps the board active at all.

 

If there's an obvious answer to this, sorry, I don't know much about this subject. I hope I can get a real response, not someone just saying a meme I don't understand at me.

 

 

 

"new[bleep]s" are what is making 4chan and /b/ so bad, older viewers AKA "Old[bleep]s" know this and try to get rid of them, but there are already too many and more keep coming and spouting memes every 5 seconds.

 

 

 

That's the best I can describe it, sorry. :oops:

But it seems like people have been complaining about them for so long, it's not really a new thing. I saw someone say that /b/ has been the same way for years, and new[bleep]s have always been there.

Ultimania, I would assume anyone who frequents /b/ is desensitized to most pictures.

 

 

 

I don't visit there much, but I had a question for someone who does. From what I've heard, "new[bleep]s" have taken over /b/ basically. Now, if they are the majority, why does the minority treat them like they don't belong? I mean, it seems like they are what keeps the board active at all.

 

If there's an obvious answer to this, sorry, I don't know much about this subject. I hope I can get a real response, not someone just saying a meme I don't understand at me.

 

/b/ has always been active. /b/tards used to be srsbiznz and raids only happened for the major lol, not just some random [bleep] on myspace or something. /b/ would never have cute pictures [except for ironic purposes] nor would anyone dare use an emoticon, these were a kiss of death to any thread. But new[bleep]s from other websites - mainly Gaia - stroll on in and immediately think "Oh hey, im anon, I can just do whatever I like lol xD" and [bleep] the place up with crap and spam memes like theyre the only thing thats funny. They often spout from ED where they read all the memes and seem to think that because they have the meme-knowledge theyll be accepted and that theyre "true anons". However, ED is for [bleep]s and you get noticed pretty fast.

 

 

 

But it seems like people have been complaining about them for so long, it's not really a new thing. I saw someone say that /b/ has been the same way for years, and new[bleep]s have always been there.

 

Its not, its just the cancer is now spreading like an epidemic. New[bleep]s have always been there, whether theyre an old[bleep] trolling or not has differed.

Isn't 4chan where 12 year olds go to [bleep] off to cartoon porn?

Isn't 4chan where 12 year olds go to [bleep] off to cartoon porn?

 

 

 

Summed up in in less than 15 words. 4chan disgusts me. I go there thinking "oO i'll have a laugh, and end up almost vomiting from sheer badness." Racist, discriminatory and idiotic.

 

 

 

I could be that i'm having bad experiences with /b/

Heheh, posts going astray.

 

Isn't 4chan where 12 year olds go to [bleep] off to cartoon porn?

 

One word is wrong in that sentence. And that makes me surprisingly angry.

 

 

 

Summed up in in less than 15 words. 4chan disgusts me. I go there thinking "oO i'll have a laugh, and end up almost vomiting from sheer badness." Racist, discriminatory and idiotic.

 

 

 

I could be that i'm having bad experiences with /b/

 

Then stop being an idiot and stay away. If it really disgusts you so, why do you keep going back to it? Deep down you probably like it, the anonymity, the ability to say anything youve ever wanted to say without reprimand but youre not allowed to let yourself admit it in case someone found out.

Ok so I guess I'll post this here.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7mn4mo-QYE

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7mn4mo-QYE

 

 

 

4Chan makes it to national TV again :lol:

Discovered another disgusting Meme thanks to /b/.

 

 

 

"wincest", if you don't know what it is I'll let you figure out by common sense and an IQ over 40.