You do realize that banks get reset like every 6 months or so. So inactive accounts- 0money to f2p. I'd say p2p win easily this time, i mean really, its so darn easy to gain money now when pvp is out, jsut take 75k, get a mate , go pk, several tries - milions of gp.... easyyyy (not to mention gwd, boy its easy to get money in there)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

garbage, you dont even know what you are talking about

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

topic: well as a full blown f2p currently, my bank is worth about 70mill gp (goal is triple digits)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

cut yews all the way to from 60-99

 

 

 

mining/smelting mith and addy from lumby mines since 70-current

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

so far i am richer than all my member friends

It all depends on whether you consider money made on p2p, p2p.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If I make 20m on p2p then go to f2p for a bit do you consider this money f2p?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If so then can we really give p2p any real value since it is merely a phase which prolongs the inevitable joining of f2p.

P2P , i would say, for those inactive accoounts, as myself, i am still P2P even you know i only pop on every so often to just chat and mess around. So yes my bank account still holds everything of the rares and up till i quit.

 

 

 

But even walking around these days and, i did come backfor a brief stint. spent tons on a house, i would still say P2P. easier to make cash.

 

 

 

I dunno if they reset banks , i never seen it happen to mine.. maybe it only on the f2p servers.

20% of F2P are dirt poor, 40% are poor pures, 20% are poor mains, 30% are mains with 3m+, 10% has more than 10m... 1% has all the rares you guys claim.

 

 

 

Just a few numbers I made up, but it's suprising accurate...

 

 

 

P2P has much more cash.

 

 

 

obviously not.

 

 

 

20% is dirt poor, maybe 10% poor pures, 10% poor mains, 30 whit 3m+ and rest is retired accounts, whit like 20% of them having a bankworth of 50m+

I have about 11-12m worth of items on p2p, and I'm dirt poor for p2p.

 

 

 

P2P all the way.

20% of F2P are dirt poor, 40% are poor pures, 20% are poor mains, 30% are mains with 3m+, 10% has more than 10m... 1% has all the rares you guys claim.

 

 

 

Just a few numbers I made up, but it's suprising accurate...

 

 

 

P2P has much more cash.

 

Thats 121% lol.

20% of F2P are dirt poor, 40% are poor pures, 20% are poor mains, 30% are mains with 3m+, 10% has more than 10m... 1% has all the rares you guys claim.

 

 

 

Just a few numbers I made up, but it's suprising accurate...

 

 

 

P2P has much more cash.

 

Thats 121% lol.

 

20% of 121%, 40% of 121%, 20% of 121%, 30% of 121%, 10% of 121%. :lol:

I can't believe a thread was needed for this. P2P, and might I add a DUH.

I can't believe a thread was needed for this. P2P, and might I add a DUH.

 

Exactly, and I like your avvy :P

Well look how many have 90+ summoning and construction and consider both of thoose skills to get to 90+ run up a bill or like 50mil+

 

 

 

Then consider your average p2p has multiple armour items including barrows sets, whips, godswords, third age armour etc each set of top end armour is atleast 500k, with msot clocking in closer to 5mil.

 

 

 

Then consider high alch, nat law and death runes, the fact mtk can produce like 1.4m a week (lest about 500k cost), sharks, potions etc etc etc etc etc

 

 

 

In actually cash wealth they may come close to equal but your average p2per will have atleast 1mil+ in items at any given time, while a f2p is more likely to have 200k in items max.

I am going to put it like this: For the people who play now, I would say P2P is richer, but if you just look at member versus nonmember, def. F2P. They have so many people who just quit, and who knows how many rares they have out there.

When retired accounts don't count:

 

And the value of a bank:

 

 

 

P2P - It has a lot better drops. Every whip drop increases the value by 1+ mill, those arcane shields increase the value by 100+ mill.

 

F2P simply can't beat that with Rune Scimitars.

 

 

 

When disabled accounts count:

 

 

 

F2P - I'm sure there are many rares and there's a lot of money on accounts which aren't used anymore - thus are F2P.

 

 

 

 

 

When you look at only the money (money only, not value of items), I think F2P wins, doesn't matter if you include retired accounts or not.

 

When someone sells a valuable item, the money comes from another P2P character, meaning the money stays the same.

 

There is coinshare, but those items get sold in the GE, and that money just 'disappears'.

 

There's also a lot of money which goes from P2P to F2P by selling things like: Coal, Lobsters, Yews, ... (The resources).

Including inactives:

 

F2P.

 

 

 

Not including inactives:

 

P2P.

wait are we includung past mems as mems or as f2pers

You do realize that banks get reset like every 6 months or so. So inactive accounts- 0money to f2p. I'd say p2p win easily this time, i mean really, its so darn easy to gain money now when pvp is out, jsut take 75k, get a mate , go pk, several tries - milions of gp.... easyyyy (not to mention gwd, boy its easy to get money in there)

 

 

 

Nah they don't. My old main had its bank re-set, but only when I was inactive for 2 years, perm banned, locked and other stuff. I later appealed and was given my account bank, with no items, re-set to lumby etc.

 

 

 

Back on topic, I'm sure sure P2P have more overall, although there are many more F2P players, I'd say a ratio of 5:1, but most P2P players are 5x richer, or more than F2P (on avarage;))

If you count inactives, F2P wins. F2p'ers outnumber p2p'ers at 9 to 1, actually that's an old figure, it's probably 10 to 1 by now.

I would say P2P because F2P players are too cheap to pay the member fees. :lol: :lol:

F2p imho, Rs has had over 130 MILLION accounts made, and all classic accounts HAVE been xferred to Rs2, even if they don't play on them. There was a huge front page post about 1m members like a year ago, so I'd guess that makes 1.6m members vs what, 128.4m f2p? Add in all classic accounts would be f2p, and a LOT of those accounts have SOME sort of rare, I'd guess f2p wins it easily. It's not 1% are filthy rich, its a lot more then that. Active f2p? Yes 1%. Inactive as well? Probably around 10%-20% easily.

I would say P2P because F2P players are too cheap to pay the member fees. :lol: :lol:

 

Congratulations, my good sir, for stereotyping when there are millions of F2Ps for you to judge!

 

 

 

OT: not really sure myself. However, I choose to believe that it is P2P, since I see 10s of /GWD drops in the Rate this! daily.

P2p easy. A lot easier to get drops that are worth millions.

 

 

 

From personal experiance i had to laugh. 7 years and the best i got was a measly dragon skirt.

 

 

 

but personally i'd say F2P. they might not look much but they cant buy bando's etc with the money so all we see is them wearing god-runite and rares. who knows whats realy behind their Pins. :-s