Jump to content

Welcome to Rune Tips, the first ever RuneScape help site. We aim to offer skill guides, quest guides, maps, calculators, informative databases, tips, and much more to help you get the most from the Massive Online Adventure Game, RuneScape, by Jagex Ltd © 2009.

Report Ad

Welcome to Forum.Tip.It
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

Abortion


  • Please log in to reply
696 replies to this topic

#21
Makaaveli
[ Display Name History ]

Makaaveli

    Unicorn Horn

  • Members
  • 186 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Joined:16 May 2007
  • RuneScape Status:None
  • RSN:Makaaveli


Hate it when people do it, it's the same concept as murder. If you don't want to take care of the baby, someone else will. If it happened through rape or something, now you know life's a [bleep], deal with it.


Wow.

"Got raped? Deal with it, life sucks."

People like this make me speechless.


I'm sorry if you didn't know that "life" for alot of people is actually struggle. Do they decide to give up on it and kill it? Do people that midway gain permanant disabilities decide to just commit suicide? No they don't, many realise how much harder someone else has it and learn to deal with it and continue living. You can't choose the cards you are dealt, but it's your job to make the best out of that hand.

Imo no matter who you are, you don't have the right to judge whether someone else should live or die, even if it's your child.

Blasphemy
“We choose to go...not because [it is] easy, but because [it is] hard, because that goal will serve to measure and organize the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win.” ~ Blasphemien Way

Posted Image

"Rest In Peace, Muelmar - A True Modern Day Hero"


#22
Assume Nothing
[ Display Name History ]

Assume Nothing

    Ice Giant Melter

  • Members
  • 4,191 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Places.
  • Joined:23 November 2008
  • RuneScape Status:Semi-Retired



Hate it when people do it, it's the same concept as murder. If you don't want to take care of the baby, someone else will. If it happened through rape or something, now you know life's a [bleep], deal with it.


Wow.

"Got raped? Deal with it, life sucks."

People like this make me speechless.


I'm sorry if you didn't know that "life" for alot of people is actually struggle. Do they decide to give up on it and kill it? Do people that midway gain permanant disabilities decide to just commit suicide? No they don't, many realise how much harder someone else has it and learn to deal with it and continue living. You can't choose the cards you are dealt, but it's your job to make the best out of that hand.

Imo no matter who you are, you don't have the right to judge whether someone else should live or die, even if it's your child.


So you're implying that even if keeping the child would kill you, you would be morally obliged to keep the child?

#23
The Observer
[ Display Name History ]

The Observer

    Lead the charge

  • SwiftKit Staff
  • 12,959 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Taking your clan to greaters
  • Joined:3 December 2005
  • RuneScape Status:Retired
It's the person's choice. If you're pro-life then go ahead, it's your choice, your child, why should you care about what other people choose? It's similar to religion, you shouldn't push it on other people. That's really the only thing that makes me angry about this debate.

One choice being "morally wrong" is irrelevant. Morals are something that is to the eye of the beholder. It's biased if you will because it depends on a person's past experiences or thoughts.

j0xPu5R.png


#24
Orpheus
[ Display Name History ]

Orpheus

    Ice Giant Melter

  • Members
  • 4,783 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:United Stat -TROMBE!
  • Joined:24 August 2006
  • RuneScape Status:None
What I'm wondering about is what would be the best course of action if having a baby would kill the mother. Would you abort then or...?

Of course it'd be the mother's decision, but still. Leaving a child to be orphaned, when there's enough as is...


I was going to eat hot dogs for dinner tonight. I think I will settle for cereal.


OPEN WIDE HERE COMES THE HELICOPTER.


#25
obfuscator
[ Display Name History ]

obfuscator

    Tanned Caveman

  • Members
  • 20,231 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Joined:6 March 2008
  • RuneScape Status:Retired
Obviously the mother's decision there. I don't think it's morally wrong to get an abortion in that case because there will be a death regardless of the action taken.

polvCwJ.gif
"It's not a rest for me, it's a rest for the weights." - Dom Mazzetti


#26
magekillr
[ Display Name History ]

magekillr

    Ice Giant Melter

  • Members
  • 4,536 posts
  • Joined:19 June 2004
Lol, you're living up to your forum name, my friend:

If you are Pro-Life, would rape/incest count as a exception? If not, why?


I'm not pro-life, but I think you could argue for the exception and not be logically inconsistent (I don't think they are being logically consistent, but you could argue it).

A woman has a right to life, but she also has a right to good health. She has a right to be free from mental anguish, which is a component of good health. She has a right to privacy. With the exception of the most radical, the debate is over what the balance should be within the law between these rights that all potential mothers enjoy and any presumptive rights that a embryo or fetus should enjoy.

As a moral question, this is obviously one of the most difficult questions to answer. As a legal matter, the courts basically say that the mother's life and health (including mental health) has the higher claim. However, her privacy right moves on a continuum, weakening as the pregnancy progresses until, eventually, the privacy right has the weaker claim. It's this last issue that is the most contentious, as most pro-life politicians concede the first two points, but fervently dispute any privacy right.

This is why it is much more radical to take the position that the embryo's rights trump every right the mother has, including her right not to suffer the mental anguish of mothering her rapist's child.

So, in conclusion, it's not really the case that there is some logical fallacy in being anti-choice with exceptions. It's actually a mirror image of Roe, which is pro-choice with exceptions.

^^Keep in mind that this argument isn't one I'd make because I disagree with it, but if you asked me in Debate Class to argue that it's not logically inconsistent to make exceptions for rape and incest, this would be my argument.

On the flip side of that, which is ultimately my own argument, people who make this exception are just exposing why they're against abortion in the first place: to control a woman's sex life and her body. People who make exceptions are like Puritans placing Scarlet Letters on women and shaming them: "Oh, you weren't raped? You [bleep], you can't have an abortion."

Still, to say that a woman must carry a rapist's baby to term is beyond your average pro-lifer; it's outright obscene, and even most abortion ban laws don't take it that far (Brazil, for example, makes these exceptions). However, what do we have running for the Senate this year? Extreme pro-rape child Republicans with Rand Paul of Kentucky, Ken Buck of Colorado, Joe Miller of Alaska, Sharron Angle of Nevada, and Christine O'Donnell of Delaware all holding this position.

Does an unborn fetus have a right to life?


Lulz, no. It'a a fetus. It doesn't even know it exists. However, even if you argue that it has a right to life, I argue that a mother's right to privacy trumps its right to life.

Under what circumstances would it be okay to abort, and where do you draw the line?


Any reason the mother chooses is okay with me during the first and second trimesters; it's her damn body. I'd say that beyond 24 weeks is only ok if there is a complication with the mother's mental or physical health, the baby is going to die, the baby won't live long once it's born, if the baby will be severely physically or mentally handicapped, or if the fetus is already dead.

However, though I draw those lines, I don't like the government regulating it because I don't trust America's politicians. They're extremely right-wing, and will do anything they can to limit a woman's choice or make it extremely difficult to get an abortion. Not to mention the fact that there's so few abortion providers in many of the red states (in some of them, there's ONE in the entire state). So I don't support the government making any laws regarding it. It's a decision between the doctor and the woman, period, and the government can get its hands out of it totally.

#27
Makaaveli
[ Display Name History ]

Makaaveli

    Unicorn Horn

  • Members
  • 186 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Joined:16 May 2007
  • RuneScape Status:None
  • RSN:Makaaveli




Hate it when people do it, it's the same concept as murder. If you don't want to take care of the baby, someone else will. If it happened through rape or something, now you know life's a [bleep], deal with it.


Wow.

"Got raped? Deal with it, life sucks."

People like this make me speechless.


I'm sorry if you didn't know that "life" for alot of people is actually struggle. Do they decide to give up on it and kill it? Do people that midway gain permanant disabilities decide to just commit suicide? No they don't, many realise how much harder someone else has it and learn to deal with it and continue living. You can't choose the cards you are dealt, but it's your job to make the best out of that hand.

Imo no matter who you are, you don't have the right to judge whether someone else should live or die, even if it's your child.


So you're implying, that even if keeping the child would kill you, you would be morally obliged to keep the child?


How would keeping a child kill you...? I mean if in some situation it was either you or the child, you may naturally have to choose yourself for survival grounds, as you wouldn't really have a choice in losing a life.

Blasphemy
“We choose to go...not because [it is] easy, but because [it is] hard, because that goal will serve to measure and organize the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win.” ~ Blasphemien Way

Posted Image

"Rest In Peace, Muelmar - A True Modern Day Hero"


#28
Assume Nothing
[ Display Name History ]

Assume Nothing

    Ice Giant Melter

  • Members
  • 4,191 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Places.
  • Joined:23 November 2008
  • RuneScape Status:Semi-Retired


Exactly the kind of post I was looking for. Besides, is the embryo even a living being?

Hmm, I found an interesting wiki quote regarding this;

"Argument from uncertainty
Some pro-life supporters argue that if there is uncertainty as to whether the fetus has a right to life, then having an abortion is equivalent to consciously taking the risk of killing another. According to this argument, if it is not known for certain whether something (such as the fetus) has a right to life, then it is reckless, and morally wrong, to treat that thing as if it lacks a right to life (for example by killing it).[57] This would place abortion in the same moral category as manslaughter (if it turns out that the fetus has a right to life) or certain forms of criminal negligence (if it turns out that the fetus does not have a right to life).[58]

David Boonin replies that if this kind of argument were correct, then the killing of nonhuman animals and plants would also be morally wrong, because (Boonin contends) it is not known for certain that such beings lack a right to life.[59] Boonin also argues that arguments from uncertainty fail because the mere fact that one might be mistaken in finding certain arguments persuasive (for example, arguments for the claim that the fetus lacks a right to life) does not mean that one should act contrary to those arguments or assume them to be mistaken.[60]"

#29
Assume Nothing
[ Display Name History ]

Assume Nothing

    Ice Giant Melter

  • Members
  • 4,191 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Places.
  • Joined:23 November 2008
  • RuneScape Status:Semi-Retired
Pro-life is almost like a religion, =/

Still haven't established clearly whether a unborn fetus has a right to life yet. It can't technically feel pain or know anything until at least the 6th week, and is it a 'human person' yet? I could argue that it's not living, but then someone will bring up the fact that it has potential life...

#30
Iamdan
[ Display Name History ]

Iamdan

    Demon Vanquisher

  • Members
  • 2,417 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Joined:23 March 2007
  • RuneScape Status:None
"Pro life" is [cabbage]. It's an old hardwired idea of self interest that isn't needed anymore because we are no longer at risk of extinction because we aren't breeding enough.

Most "Pro lifers" keep sweatshops in business, contribute to animal deaths, spend money they could use to save lives in third world countries etc. They aren't pro life, they're pro high horse.

Also, george carlin makes an excellent point:

"Pro lifers say that life starts at conception. I say life started a few billion years ago and it just keeps rolling along."

I'm sorry if you didn't know that "life" for alot of people is actually struggle.


It sure is. Some people live, some don't.

#31
Racheya
[ Display Name History ]

Racheya

    A noob

  • Editorial Panel
  • 7,253 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Salford, England
  • Joined:17 October 2008
  • RuneScape Status:Retired
  • RSN:Bernkastel





Hate it when people do it, it's the same concept as murder. If you don't want to take care of the baby, someone else will. If it happened through rape or something, now you know life's a [bleep], deal with it.


Wow.

"Got raped? Deal with it, life sucks."

People like this make me speechless.


I'm sorry if you didn't know that "life" for alot of people is actually struggle. Do they decide to give up on it and kill it? Do people that midway gain permanant disabilities decide to just commit suicide? No they don't, many realise how much harder someone else has it and learn to deal with it and continue living. You can't choose the cards you are dealt, but it's your job to make the best out of that hand.

Imo no matter who you are, you don't have the right to judge whether someone else should live or die, even if it's your child.


So you're implying, that even if keeping the child would kill you, you would be morally obliged to keep the child?


How would keeping a child kill you...? I mean if in some situation it was either you or the child, you may naturally have to choose yourself for survival grounds, as you wouldn't really have a choice in losing a life.

The sensitivity of OT yet again comes across like a brick.

Keeping a child could kill you if either you or the foetus has a medical problem. There are cases where you might die if you don't terminate a foetus.

I'm trying to not get dragged into this debate, again, there's a point where it just gets boring :P


Posted Image
I edit for the [Tip.It Times]. I rarely write in [My Blog]. I am an [Ex-Moderator].


#32
Dax
[ Display Name History ]

Dax

    Dragon Slayer

  • Members
  • 6,017 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Joined:9 February 2007
I'm fine if they want to, it's their choice. But personally, I don't think I could tell my wife/partner/what have you to get an abortion.

#KERR2016/17/18/19/20.

 

#rpgformod


#33
Satenza
[ Display Name History ]

Satenza

    Ice Giant Melter

  • Members
  • 4,124 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:United Kingdom/Belgium/France
  • Joined:18 November 2005
  • RuneScape Status:Retired
I tend to be pro-life but I am not against abortion either.
Posted Image
With so many trees in the city you could see the spring coming each day until a night of warm wind would bring it suddenly in one morning. Sometimes the heavy cold rains would beat it back so that it would seem that it would never come and that you were losing a season out of your life. But you knew that there would always be the spring as you knew the river would flow again after it was frozen. When the cold rains kept on and killed the spring, it was as though a young person had died for no reason. In those days though the spring always came finally but it was frightening that it had nearly failed.

#34
obfuscator
[ Display Name History ]

obfuscator

    Tanned Caveman

  • Members
  • 20,231 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Joined:6 March 2008
  • RuneScape Status:Retired

"Pro life" is [cabbage]. It's an old hardwired idea of self interest that isn't needed anymore because we are no longer at risk of extinction because we aren't breeding enough.

Most "Pro lifers" keep sweatshops in business, contribute to animal deaths, spend money they could use to save lives in third world countries etc. They aren't pro life, they're pro high horse.

Also, george carlin makes an excellent point:

"Pro lifers say that life starts at conception. I say life started a few billion years ago and it just keeps rolling along."


I'm sorry if you didn't know that "life" for alot of people is actually struggle.


It sure is. Some people live, some don't.


I promised myself I wouldn't get into a debate here but I think this is the most ridiculously bigoted post I've seen on these forums, and I've seen a lot.

Why is it so incredibly hard to comprehend that this issue is about a set of morals that is different from person to person - and one is not better than the other.

It's ridiculous and unfair to make assumptions about why I'm pro-life when I've constantly reiterated that I believe a fetus is a human life.

Most pro-lifers keep sweat shops in business? Most pro-lifers contribute to animal deaths? Most pro-lifers spend money they could use to save lives in 3rd world countries etc?

Where the hell do you get the blanket authority to assume every pro-lifer follows your ridiculous stereotypes?

However, let's start with my personal views. I'm pro-life. I believe a fetus is a human being, and thus should be protected. I believe in a right to life for all humans. Sweat shops are inhuman places where the right to life of many is severely hindered and sometimes taken completely. Wow, guess what? Looks like my "[cabbage]" pro-life views make me extremely anti-sweat shops? What a surprise.

I'm a little confused by what you mean as contributing to animal deaths. I eat meat. Not often, but from time to time. I don't hunt, I don't deliberately kill animals, yet somehow...Look guys, I'm pro-life! I absolutely must be a mass baby-seal murderer!

I spent money I could use to save third world countries? Guilty as charged. You don't spend any money at all, right? You take your paycheck and ship it right off to the red cross, correct?

Actually, I've been on several community service projects to very poor places in Canada and other countries over my life span and plan to go on one again after I graduate.

polvCwJ.gif
"It's not a rest for me, it's a rest for the weights." - Dom Mazzetti


#35
Guest_Rob_
[ Display Name History ]

Guest_Rob_
  • Guests
Just curious, has a fetus (Less then, I'll say 10 weeks into pregnancy) been proven to have the "conscience" of a human? (As in, knowing it's alive, emotions...ect)

#36
sees_all1
[ Display Name History ]

sees_all1

    Ice Giant Melter

  • Members
  • 4,961 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Joined:26 June 2007
  • RuneScape Status:None
You couldn't just read the last thread?

99 dungeoneering achieved, thanks to everyone that celebrated with me!

 

♪♪ Don't interrupt me as I struggle to complete this thought
Have some respect for someone more forgetful than yourself ♪♪

♪♪ And I'm not done
And I won't be till my head falls off ♪♪


#37
Alg
[ Display Name History ]

Alg

    Troll General

  • Editorial Panel
  • 10,880 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:California.
  • Joined:5 August 2006

Just curious, has a fetus (Less then, I'll say 10 weeks into pregnancy) been proven to have the "conscience" of a human? (As in, knowing it's alive, emotions...ect)

i think the argument is that it has the potential to gain that at a later period. A lot of the stuff you just listed doesn't actually develop until (up to) a few years after the baby is already born.
You could look at it as real birth taking several years, at 9 months the vital bits are just done. It takes a while after to finish the parts that we say make us 'human'.

#38
Dupin
[ Display Name History ]

Dupin

    Hobgoblin Killer

  • Members
  • 1,659 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Joined:24 December 2009
  • RuneScape Status:Retired

"Pro life" is [cabbage]. It's an old hardwired idea of self interest that isn't needed anymore because we are no longer at risk of extinction because we aren't breeding enough.

Most "Pro lifers" keep sweatshops in business, contribute to animal deaths, spend money they could use to save lives in third world countries etc. They aren't pro life, they're pro high horse.

Also, george carlin makes an excellent point:

"Pro lifers say that life starts at conception. I say life started a few billion years ago and it just keeps rolling along."


I'm sorry if you didn't know that "life" for alot of people is actually struggle.


It sure is. Some people live, some don't.

If all beings have a natural instinct for self-preservation and preservation of the species, as I believe you have stated in the past, then wouldn't killing a fetus be contrary to those instincts? Then, logically, you are fighting your instincts, and have a chemical imbalance in the brain. If you have a chemical imbalance in the brain, then you are not capable of making your own decisions, and therfore your choices need to be regulated by the government.

This is the logical reasoning you used to support your anti-suicide views in another thread, if I remember correctly. Why does it not apply here?

TLDR

People like you annoy me to no end. We were all happily making our sweeping anti-pro-life generalizations and restating each other's points until you decided you would disrupt our debate with a real argument.

And this brings us back to my first post, which said that this topic is really a matter of opinion, not of logic. In the end, what it comes down to is whether or not you believe a fetus has a right to life.

#39
sees_all1
[ Display Name History ]

sees_all1

    Ice Giant Melter

  • Members
  • 4,961 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Joined:26 June 2007
  • RuneScape Status:None

And this brings us back to my first post, which said that this topic is really a matter of opinion, not of logic. In the end, what it comes down to is whether or not you believe a fetus has a right to life.

Except it isn't whether or not, it's when.

Here's a hypothetical situation (not sure if its ever occurred or not, but the way the law is written... well you never know) -
A woman 6 months pregnant gets in a car to drive to a clinic to procure an abortion. Nothing eventful happens, and she returns home not pregnant. No laws were broken, nothing to report.

Same story, but with a twist. That same woman gets in a car to drive to a clinic. On her way to the clinic, another driver runs the light, and hits her car. On the way to the hospital, the woman has a miscarriage. The woman is fine otherwise. The driver is charged with reckless homicide because they killed the preborn (who, by the way, was scheduled to die anyway). Instead of getting a six months, the driver gets 60 years in prison.


Good fight, law.

99 dungeoneering achieved, thanks to everyone that celebrated with me!

 

♪♪ Don't interrupt me as I struggle to complete this thought
Have some respect for someone more forgetful than yourself ♪♪

♪♪ And I'm not done
And I won't be till my head falls off ♪♪


#40
lizzywizzy
[ Display Name History ]

lizzywizzy

    Unicorn Horn

  • Members
  • 164 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:south wales
  • Joined:25 June 2004
  • RuneScape Status:P2P
  • RSN:lizzy_wizzy
In the bigger picture of things I am neither for or against abortion.

I know I could not easily abort a baby, but I think rape and serious medical problems would be a serious factor to make me consider abortion. However while I would not easily choose abortion, I would not hold it against someone who had one.

I am pregnant at the moment, and I am planning on keeping it (i am 10 weeks gone) I think the mother (and father to some extent) has every right to do what is right for them and the situation they are in.


I do believe that they should lower the maximum limit for having an abortion to before 24 weeks, there was a story in one of the papers where a woman went into labour at a few days short of 24 weeks, and the baby survived(all be it for a few hours), although its highly unlikely that the baby could survive for a while at that early stage, I think it should be brought forward.


I really do believe that every woman has the right to the last say as to what happens with her body, if she doesn't want to carry that child (Although pill/condoms/whatever should have been used) she should have the right to not carry it.


Sees..... I am pretty sure that you cant get prosecuted for murder if you kill an unborn child, unless you have different laws against that, but im pretty sure that wouldn't be classed as killing someone here.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users