May 20, 201115 yr WTF!?!?!? are u [bleep]ing serious jagex ?!?!?!?!?! really ?1?!?! lvl 84 boss for a lvl 26 ???? i thought it was pretty stupid when i encountered this lvl84 boss on my lvl50 but this time its just ridiculous [end rant]
May 20, 201115 yr Boss levels are calculated by your constitution level.So, as a pure... In real life MMO you don't get 99 smithing by making endless bronze daggers.
May 20, 201115 yr I can't remember the magic level required to use your personal gatestone, but you could use the highest combat spell you have and gatestone trick to avoid damage altogether. It'll take awhile, though. 1. Place personal gatestone outside boss room.2. Run in and immediately attack.3. Tele out using personal gate.4. Repeat. Your personal gate negates all damage that would've been done to you, so as long as you're quick, you should be fine. But, again . . . that'll take awhile. And a lot of cosmics. To put it bluntly, [bleep] off.
May 20, 201115 yr I see nothing as an issue. Most boss monsters max out at ~4* your combat level.There are a boss monster afterall. Why is a lvl 84 for a lvl 26 any worse than a lvl 320ish for a lvl 100ish?Both are 3.2* higher level. Operation Gold Sparkles :: Chompy Kills :: Full Profound :: Champions :: Barbarian Notes :: Champions Tackle Box :: MA RewardsDragonkin Journals :: Ports Stories :: Elder Chronicles :: Boss Slayer :: Penance King :: Kal'gerion Titles :: Gold Statue
May 20, 201115 yr It's meant to be a challenge. After all it's the boss monster. As Sy_Accursed suggested, it's the same story for higher levels as well. I can't recall the last boss monster I had that was under 200 combat. But yeah, I can imagine the extra challenge it is for pures. So if you do get a chaotic weapon, imagine the extra advantage you'll have against others.
May 20, 201115 yr pure by its original definition is something with its hp > combat leveldue to dungeoneering monsters being based off your hp level....a pure that low leveld really should be using lamps while you train up a bit more If you quote me please be sure to note that I'm extremely mad.
May 21, 201115 yr Actually, it's because Har'Lakk's minimum level is 84. Not because of combat stats or anything :P BlogTrimmed | Master Quester | Final BossBoss pets: Bombi | Shrimpy | Ellie | Tz-Rek Jad | Karil the Bobbled | Mega Ducklings120s: Dungeoneering | Invention
May 21, 201115 yr WTF!?!?!? are u [bleep]ing serious jagex ?!?!?!?!?! really ?1?!?! lvl 84 boss for a lvl 26 ???? i thought it was pretty stupid when i encountered this lvl84 boss on my lvl50 but this time its just ridiculous [end rant] Solution: Don't be a strength pure.
May 21, 201115 yr I don't really see a problem here. As stated above, this monster is a boss. It isn't meant to be easy. The same is for higher levels, the maths is no different. It was your choice to train as a 1 defence pure, it is your burden to carry. JaGeX doesn't need slagging down for your choices. Good luck!
May 22, 201115 yr Also, Dungeoneering is supposed to be a skill that benefits from other skills. Go train up some skills first before you attempt it. ~ W ~
May 22, 201115 yr I don't really see a problem here. As stated above, this monster is a boss. It isn't meant to be easy. The same is for higher levels, the maths is no different. It was your choice to train as a 1 defence pure, it is your burden to carry. JaGeX doesn't need slagging down for your choices. Good luck! Username: Wang8eggRS Name: iTZ FRI DAYThread title: WTF r u serious LOOK are u [bleep]ing serious jagex ?!?!?!?!?! really ?1?!?! lvl 84 boss for a lvl 26 ???? OP didn't choose to become a pure, his brain was programmed with pure mentality from day one.
May 22, 201115 yr I don't really see a problem here. As stated above, this monster is a boss. It isn't meant to be easy. The same is for higher levels, the maths is no different. It was your choice to train as a 1 defence pure, it is your burden to carry. JaGeX doesn't need slagging down for your choices. Good luck! Username: Wang8eggRS Name: iTZ FRI DAYThread title: WTF r u serious LOOK are u [bleep]ing serious jagex ?!?!?!?!?! really ?1?!?! lvl 84 boss for a lvl 26 ???? OP didn't choose to become a pure, his brain was programmed with pure mentality from day one. :lol: PM me for fitocracy invite
May 22, 201115 yr *Lol, picture* WTF!?!?!? are u [bleep]ing serious jagex ?!?!?!?!?! really ?1?!?! lvl 84 boss for a lvl 26 ???? i thought it was pretty stupid when i encountered this lvl84 boss on my lvl50 but this time its just ridiculous [end rant] Solution: Don't be a strength pure.A man after my own heart. "An Amateur practices until he can get it right. A Professional practices until he can't get it wrong." Quests just keep bringing me back to this game.
May 23, 201115 yr I don't [bleep]ing get the purpose of being pure, anyway. After the numerous changes Jagex has made to the game, there is really little benefit to being a pure anymore. The only kind of pure that is still decent is the summoning/defense pure, but that requires a significant amount of capital and time investment to accomplish.
May 23, 201115 yr 75 defence pure is best!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! If you quote me please be sure to note that I'm extremely mad.
May 24, 201115 yr Actually, it's because Har'Lakk's minimum level is 84. Not because of combat stats or anything :PThis. For some reason everybody wants to ignore this fact and simply mess with OP for being a pure.If this were a lvl 26 main, would it really be any different? And his HP isn't really high enough to justify a boss monster that high.(for other bosses anyway)
May 29, 201115 yr Bosses have a minimum level.They figure by the time you can reach a certain boss, you'd be strong enough to take it on.You cannot find a saggitarre under level 69 for instance (iirc) Fisher/Woodcut------Me-----Miner/crafter----Stabber----Leecher ^Golvellius must be so proud^
May 29, 201115 yr You should be doing larges by then, even if you spend 2 hours/dungeon you'll still be getting very good exp.
June 5, 201115 yr Why is a lvl 84 for a lvl 26 any worse than a lvl 320ish for a lvl 100ish?Both are 3.2* higher level. It doesn't really quite work like that though. As your combat increases you can start to kill monsters of a much higher level than yourself pretty easily. A level 3 will have trouble against a level 7 farmer, but at level 138 you can kill a monster like the Corporeal Beast solo, and at level 128 I can kill level 304 mith dragons while semi-afk despite them being nearly three times my level. Cabbage! (:<
June 5, 201115 yr Dungeoneering is an endgame skill. Deal with it. DK drops (solo/LS): 66 hatchets, 14 archer rings, 13 berserker rings, 17 warrior rings, 12 seerculls, 13 mud staves, 7 seers ringsQBD drops: 1 kite, 2 visages, 4 dragonbone kits, 3 effigies, lots of crossbow partsCR vs. CLS threads always turn into discussions about penis size....It's not called a Compensation Longsword for nothing.I've sent a 12k combat mission to have Aiel assassinated (poor bastard isn't even Pincers-tier difficulty).
June 6, 201115 yr Why is a lvl 84 for a lvl 26 any worse than a lvl 320ish for a lvl 100ish?Both are 3.2* higher level. It doesn't really quite work like that though. As your combat increases you can start to kill monsters of a much higher level than yourself pretty easily. A level 3 will have trouble against a level 7 farmer, but at level 138 you can kill a monster like the Corporeal Beast solo, and at level 128 I can kill level 304 mith dragons while semi-afk despite them being nearly three times my level. That's nothing to do with them being easier.It's to do with you having the right gear and exploiting their weaknesses. As a level 3 you can easily kill stuff into the 20s if you have the right armour, food and tactic.Do not mistake having gear etc for them being "easier" in general; go there with the wrong gear entirely and watch yourself get pwned. Operation Gold Sparkles :: Chompy Kills :: Full Profound :: Champions :: Barbarian Notes :: Champions Tackle Box :: MA RewardsDragonkin Journals :: Ports Stories :: Elder Chronicles :: Boss Slayer :: Penance King :: Kal'gerion Titles :: Gold Statue
Create an account or sign in to comment