February 14, 201412 yr I just hope it gives decent bonus XP. Just because of the fact I hate theiving and hunter. Mind numbing.
February 14, 201412 yr Don't the guards have some penalty for false accusation? Looks like the guy got knocked out after a mistake. In real life MMO you don't get 99 smithing by making endless bronze daggers.
February 14, 201412 yr Hopefully guards can't spam-accuse like that though. Maxed since Sunday, January 9th, 2014Completionist since Wednesday, June 4th, 2014
February 14, 201412 yr if it's like the other game that i saw, there will also be a lot of frequent hiding spots so you could probably hop your way across the entire map and just grab a disguise when you need one the thing about having multiple players is that guards have to have effective cover coordination, and thieves have to be able to run distraction tactics to waste the guards' time so that somebody can grab the loot if the building has a lot of entrances, it'll be harder to deal with multiple thieves
February 14, 201412 yr If the treasure is in a dedicated place. It would be camped. If its in an open public area where other npcs and objects are. It would be better.
February 14, 201412 yr So no rewards besides bxp? :( Not even guard or robber overides? Would be perfect for adding more thief gear or hunting gear. [spoiler=click you know you wanna]Me behave? Seriously? As a child I saw Tarzan almost naked, Cinderella arrived home from a party after midnight, Pinocchio told lies, Aladin was a thief, Batman drove over 200 miles an hour, Snow White lived in a house with seven men, Popeye smoked a pipe and had tattoos, Pac man ran around to digital music while eating pills that enhanced his performance, and Shaggy and Scooby were mystery solving hippies who always had the munchies. The fault is not mine! if you had this childhood and loved it put this in your signature!
February 14, 201412 yr Surely a coordinated guards team could have 1 person standing at the noticeboard reporting all the disguises whilst the other guards use the tracker to just pick off the robbers really really easily... | | | A Blog to Bathtubs for BeginnersQuest Cape | 99 Defence Achieved 11-Jul-2011 17:41 | 99 Prayer 11-Jul-2012 | 99 Constitution 02-Aug-201299 Attack 31/10/2012 | 99 Dungeoneering 31/10/2012 | 99 Strength 31/10/2012 | 99 Magic 2/12/201299 Range 16/12/2012 | 99 Herblore 25/12/2012 | 99 Summoning 4/1/2013 | 99 Firemaking 6/3/201399 Farming 10/4/2013 | 99 Slayer 11/7/2013 | 99 Fletching 21/8/2013 | 99 Smithing 22/8/2013 99 Crafting 19/12/2013 | 99 Cooking 15/1/2014 | 99 Agility 25/1/2014 | 99 Thieving 01/02/201499 Construction 21/04/2014 | 99 Woodcutting 04/03/2014 | 99 Fishing 17/04/2014 | 99 Mining 23/07/201599 Divination 27/07/2015 | 99 Runecrafting 20/08/2015 | 99 Hunter 20/08/2015 | Maxed 20/08/2015
February 14, 201412 yr Surely a coordinated guards team could have 1 person standing at the noticeboard reporting all the disguises whilst the other guards use the tracker to just pick off the robbers really really easily...Yeah there seems to be a pretty easy way for one team to dominate no matter what, depending on what Jagex does. I want to say that they'd be aware of this and wouldn't release a beatable minigame, but I just don't know anymore.
February 14, 201412 yr I suspect there will be limits to the notice board. Maxed since Sunday, January 9th, 2014Completionist since Wednesday, June 4th, 2014
February 14, 201412 yr Too bad it has to be over 200k xp/hr to be "efficient" Quest Cape Achieved on November 14, 2007Items AcquiredCrystal Pick and HatchetBerzerker Ring x 33/28 Barrows Items
February 14, 201412 yr Too bad it has to be over 200k xp/hr to be "efficient"Has to be more than 300k bxp/hour to be efficient
February 14, 201412 yr I'm not exactly thrilled over Hiest. I hope there is more to. It than just bxp. I'm really interested in the One of a Kind quest. Maxed [February 14, 2012] | Completionist [October 25, 2012] | Trimmed Completionist [in Progress]Visit my Blog!
February 15, 201412 yr Rolling back to 138 or keeping 200 yet people are picking 138 combat. for [bleep] sake you [bleep]ing nostalgia [bleep]ers, stop making this game go in stupid circles. Getting mighty tired of the power they've given to these [bleep]ing idiots. /mad
February 15, 201412 yr Rolling back to 138 or keeping 200 yet people are picking 138 combat. for [bleep] sake you [bleep]ing nostalgia [bleep]ers, stop making this game go in stupid circles. Getting mighty tired of the power they've given to these [bleep]ing idiots. /madIf you read the poll, you'd know that no matter what happens, the combat calculation will change. The only difference is that the final number would be 138 or 200. I don't see the harm in having 138 as the final number for nostalgia purposes since the calculation will not be the same. They're not "going in circles." They're reworking the combat calculation (since both the previous lv 138 and the current lv 200 are equally as flawed) and are asking the players if they'd want the max level to be 138 or 200. My only problem with it is that they're making it the Dragonstone poll. That the maximum combat level of a reworked combat calculation was 138 or 200 is really insignificant, they could have used the Dragonstone poll spot for something more important and made that the Ruby poll or something.
February 15, 201412 yr stockholm syndrome again it's why we use standard instead of metric in the us is it not
February 15, 201412 yr Yo keep the poll discussion on the official topic (rants forum jr). Maxed [February 14, 2012] | Completionist [October 25, 2012] | Trimmed Completionist [in Progress]Visit my Blog!
February 15, 201412 yr I've often thought it was somewhat unfair that bunny ears and scythes were so restricted when they are quite unique but in a certain sense, generic items. Scythes are sort of a general weapon type really, and we have seemingly a whole line of animal ears that bunny ears would have fit nicely into. I would have rather seen scythes be introduced across metal types as a "stab" version of a halberd with a reach like one, but a more generic override is preferable to nothing other than the incredibly exclusive original and golden scythes, and highly fantasized new reaper scythe.You just made me realize that they changed halberds from stabbing to slashing weapons... wow. Anyway, scythes make terrible weapons, and they don't have reach either, typically. I'd rather see glaives or polehammers or whatnot. Yes, actually I wanted to include those two you mentioned as "crush" equivalent reach weapons but I felt it was perhaps beyond the scope.. :P
February 15, 201412 yr As a mammary expert I can tell you there are better alternatives than the RuneScape version. :s OK, late (and not really relevant to the current subject of discussion anymore), but I was trying to find this back:
February 15, 201412 yr 200CB should not of been there anyway. Simple. If 75% say no, its common sense that they did wrong.
February 15, 201412 yr 200CB should not of been there anyway. Simple. If 75% say no, its common sense that they did wrong.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum
February 15, 201412 yr 200CB should not of been there anyway. Simple. If 75% say no, its common sense that they did wrong. The majority of the Bible Belt refuses the evolution theory, just to mention. :p I voted for 138, as I think ALL levels should be factored to show "combat ability".
February 15, 201412 yr 200CB should not of been there anyway. Simple. If 75% say no, its common sense that they did wrong. The majority of the Bible Belt refuses the evolution theory, just to mention. :P I voted for 138, as I think ALL levels should be factored to show "combat ability". 138 doesn't do any better than that than 200 though. Either way they're both pretty broken. I doubt the community will let Jagex fix them though so ultimately it doesn't matter. R.I.P. The olde nite. A legend is gone but not forgotten. a Faction Related Item Sink for Rune Labs. https://[LikelyScam]/m=player-proposal/a=13/c=VcG-Ir5Ijno/view-idea?idea=19
February 15, 201412 yr Hmm, from the wording of the 138-option it seems to me they are reworking how those 138 levels will be gotten, so not by the old formula. :)
February 15, 201412 yr Then there really is no point other than nostalgia, is there? I recall hearing that they'd be redoing it the same way if they stuck with 200. I painted some stuff and put it on tumblr
February 15, 201412 yr 200CB should not of been there anyway. Simple. If 75% say no, its common sense that they did wrong. The majority of the Bible Belt refuses the evolution theory, just to mention. :P I voted for 138, as I think ALL levels should be factored to show "combat ability". When you factor in every skill, you get a result that's effectively a random number.
Create an account or sign in to comment