Nadril Posted September 7, 2006 Share Posted September 7, 2006 I'd hate to post on this topic again, but that image is just too great to pass up a good 'ole "LOL". Not to mention, it's incredibly true. It's funny that sony has almost been crying out for attention. Btw, the reason I say they are stubborn is because they think (well know) that their fanboys will still buy the system, no matter how much it cost's and sucks. There is a lot of problems wrong with blue ray, many which may make sony lose a lot of money, but they are too stubborn to just not use blue ray. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viktorkrum77 Posted September 7, 2006 Share Posted September 7, 2006 I'm not up to snuff on game consul programming. So what exactly is blue ray? A graphics program? That's what I've been thinking? Me doing staff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nadril Posted September 7, 2006 Share Posted September 7, 2006 I'm not up to snuff on game consul programming. So what exactly is blue ray? A graphics program? That's what I've been thinking? It's bassicly like a "better" DVD drive. Blue ray disc's allow you to hold more info, blah blah blah. It's very expensive technolgy atm though, I realy don't know why sony is using it. i wouldnt go THAT far I would :lol: . It's not just the sony that does playstations, seems like a lot of the divisions of sony are like that. (SOE in paticular as well). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGBR Posted September 7, 2006 Share Posted September 7, 2006 Btw, the reason I say they are stubborn is because they think (well know) that their fanboys will still buy the system, no matter how much it cost's and sucks. There is a lot of problems wrong with blue ray, many which may make sony lose a lot of money, but they are too stubborn to just not use blue ray. you cant say it sucks when it is technologically more superior than any console when it gets down to it the only arguement against it is opinion, you cant argue that wii has better graphics or better quality because it doesnt, the only way you can say it is better is in gameplay which is purely opinion The world would be a whole lot better if little green men in UFO's came down to earth to abduct rednecks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nadril Posted September 7, 2006 Share Posted September 7, 2006 Btw, the reason I say they are stubborn is because they think (well know) that their fanboys will still buy the system, no matter how much it cost's and sucks. There is a lot of problems wrong with blue ray, many which may make sony lose a lot of money, but they are too stubborn to just not use blue ray. you cant say it sucks when it is technologically more superior than any console when it gets down to it the only arguement against it is opinion, you cant argue that wii has better graphics or better quality because it doesnt, the only way you can say it is better is in gameplay which is purely opinion The graphics aren't going to matter much if the system it's self is fairly instable. Sony has been having a hard time getting all 8 cores to work. So, they have settled with some units only having 7 of the 8. The thing is.. is that these are prone to go out sometimes, and if you go below 7/8 cores the system will probaly fail / work poorly. The graphics "may" be more supperior (but honestly, thats not that big of a deal because PC's will always be supperior to the PS3. Plus, at least in the first age cames coming out, the graphics on the PS3 are about equal to the Xbox360). but yet the actualy technology is still fairly new, and realy instable at times. Btw, I was saying "if" it sucked the fanboys would still be running to the shops doors and buy them all out. I didn't say it sucked, yet. But from what i've seen so far it "probaly" will. but anyways, case in point the whole "it's technologically more superior than any console" is a very little part of console gaming. Especialy when it's about on par with the 360 right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RebelAssassin Posted September 7, 2006 Share Posted September 7, 2006 I'm not up to snuff on game consul programming. So what exactly is blue ray? A graphics program? That's what I've been thinking? its a disc format with higher memory, pretty much a godsend for lazy companies who cant be botherd to take out unused features in games and creating bugs. i think EA said they where excited by the new format which says it all really. www.PETAkillsanimals.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nadril Posted September 7, 2006 Share Posted September 7, 2006 I'm not up to snuff on game consul programming. So what exactly is blue ray? A graphics program? That's what I've been thinking? its a disc format with higher memory, pretty much a godsend for lazy companies who cant be botherd to take out unused features in games and creating bugs. i think EA said they where excited by the new format which says it all really. How true.. how true. Man I'd shudder to think if EA and Sony got together for something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart_G Posted September 7, 2006 Author Share Posted September 7, 2006 I'm not up to snuff on game consul programming. So what exactly is blue ray? A graphics program? That's what I've been thinking? its a disc format with higher memory, pretty much a godsend for lazy companies who cant be botherd to take out unused features in games and creating bugs. i think EA said they where excited by the new format which says it all really. How true.. how true. Man I'd shudder to think if EA and Sony got together for something. EA are supporting the Wii as well and it seems they think it has a very bright future ahead of it. Link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anesthesia Posted September 7, 2006 Share Posted September 7, 2006 Man I'd shudder to think if EA and Sony got together for something. It would be a game which leaves your console open to hackers, is crammed full of ads and then breaks after 6 months. Some people are changed by being a moderator. I wouldn't be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bubsa Posted September 7, 2006 Share Posted September 7, 2006 Man I'd shudder to think if EA and Sony got together for something. It would be a game which leaves your console open to hackers, is crammed full of ads and then breaks after 6 months. And that's being optimistic. This is how much you all raised for charity. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nadril Posted September 7, 2006 Share Posted September 7, 2006 Man I'd shudder to think if EA and Sony got together for something. It would be a game which leaves your console open to hackers, is crammed full of ads and then breaks after 6 months. You forgot the part that around the 6 month mark sony decides the game isn't "good enough" (Even though finaly turning it into a... decent game) and completly changes the gameplay, from a MMOFPS to a Puzzle game. And of course, EA would continue to release their patches swearing up and down they would fix a bug that has plauged the game since release, and every patch the game seems to get worse. And of course, at about the 9-10 month mark EA would close the game down, no matter how many players are playing it. They'd make history together allright... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piscis_Rex Posted September 7, 2006 Share Posted September 7, 2006 well, i wasn't planning on getting a ps3 anyway but if i was going to get a third generation console it'd be the wii, but this guy in my school, he is a nintendo fanatic, he had an argument with another guy in my school as to which was better: playstation or nintendo, this i don't mind but he actually gave the other guy a piece of paper entitled "10 reasons why the wii is better than the playstation 3" now that is what i call obsession 99.99999998465% of the world's population is not me, if you are the 0.00000001535% that is me, put this in you signature -"being famous is like being a woman, if you have to tell people you are, you aren't" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anesthesia Posted September 7, 2006 Share Posted September 7, 2006 Wait a moment, I have had the best idea since /pizza: /liposuction. Some people are changed by being a moderator. I wouldn't be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biggy08755 Posted September 7, 2006 Share Posted September 7, 2006 wii60 ftw :) Sony deserves to die... they redid there controller to copy the wii's well today at 11:30 am 14 years ago i was born.. wo0t!!!At 11:30 you should start holding your head underwater wo0t!!!Stop acting such a moron. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bjbj1991 Posted September 8, 2006 Share Posted September 8, 2006 I found the PS3s!!!! IBM stole them and made them into a computer. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/07/technology/07compute.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
runesmithie Posted September 8, 2006 Share Posted September 8, 2006 Wait a moment, I have had the best idea since /pizza: /liposuction. /brazilianliposuction ? I just posted something! ^_^ to the terrorist...er... kirbybeam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tigra00 Posted September 8, 2006 Share Posted September 8, 2006 Jesus, Australia is being molested with bad news this week... :wall: The popularity of any given religion today depends on the victories of the wars they fought in the past. - Me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stan18 Posted September 8, 2006 Share Posted September 8, 2006 has the wii had any bad publicity at all? i have yet to hear any bad news for it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anesthesia Posted September 8, 2006 Share Posted September 8, 2006 It's a different kettle of fish I think, the Wii is being hypes by the (future) consumers whereas the PS3 is being hyped by the developers. Some people are changed by being a moderator. I wouldn't be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr_Putter Posted September 9, 2006 Share Posted September 9, 2006 Woah, bad week for Europe: http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3153486 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cadburys_egg Posted September 9, 2006 Share Posted September 9, 2006 It's a different kettle of fish I think, the Wii is being hypes by the (future) consumers whereas the PS3 is being hyped by the developers. And some people are just against Sony. Wii is being hyped for having a new way to control the game. PS3 is being hyped for having a whole new level of graphics. Wii is being booed for being no way near as good graphics as it's competitors. PS3 is being booed for being expensive. (oh, and it being delayed (again)) I don't really mind if it is delayed, i've been promised that if I do well in my GCSE's (Bs and above) i'll get one. So really, they can delay it for a short while longer, that way i'll be able to pre-order and be like "omfg i gawt a PS3 before you!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
How2PK Posted September 9, 2006 Share Posted September 9, 2006 I don't think better graphics is something to hype about. Signature by Maurice SendakWhen the stars make you drool just like a pasta fazool, that's amore! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bjbj1991 Posted September 9, 2006 Share Posted September 9, 2006 I don't think better graphics is something to hype about. No, its not. The gamming community is in a bad position right now because nearly every game is following the same cookie cutter stragity. Right now companies are spending more and more on artists to create these picture perfect landscapes that the scripting and programing are being neglected. At our current level of tech, a complete (I consider RS2 a 2d array) 3d landscape with cartoony characters is just fine. I dont care about seeing Shack sweat during a game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaddd Posted September 9, 2006 Share Posted September 9, 2006 Luckily, I live in north America. I'm still getting one for $600... But I don't really give a crap for the Blu-Ray. It's not needed or wanted by anyone and it costs about $250 to add it to the system. So far they've ripped Nintendo, added Blu-Ray, overpriced the system $250+, and delayed it. What next? :roll: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
How2PK Posted September 9, 2006 Share Posted September 9, 2006 At our current level of tech, a complete (I consider RS2 a 2d array) 3d landscape with cartoony characters is just fine. I dont care about seeing Shack sweat during a game. Agreed! But it brings so much more realism to the game. :') NEWSFLASH! You're playing a FANTASY GAME!. It's sad, people caring so much about looks, when it's gameplay that's most important. Atleast, in this state we're living in: where graphics are so good already. Signature by Maurice SendakWhen the stars make you drool just like a pasta fazool, that's amore! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now