Everything posted by Skull
- Today...
- Today...
- Today...
-
Real life pictures - 3
The suit really does work for you. I can see why you wear it.
-
Real life pictures - 3
It's a legitimate rule too though, although it does require some tweaking here and there.
-
Clinton Bush Haiti Fund
Clinton did quite a few good things during his administration. That's the only thing I'm going to address since the rest is ridiculous.
- Today...
- Today...
- Today...
- Bigotry
- Today...
-
Electronic Music
Surf Solar by [bleep] Buttons. Lovely song.
-
Converting .rar to mp3?
If you're torrenting it there's basically no reason for it to be in .rar format, so if that's the case than I'd look for another torrent. However, I'm guessing that's not how you're doing it, so just make sure you scan it and make sure they're all .mp3 files, otherwise delete them.
- Dope.
-
Birthday present?
You're better off with a shelter animal in many cases than a purebred anyways, a mixed breed dog is far less likely to have genetic flaws than a purebred unless you're willing to throw down some serious money for a dog. Shelter animals can still run you anywhere from $100 to $500 anyways and the price of ownership is much larger by comparison than the price of actually getting the dog; $5,000 to $20,000 or more over the life of the animal in food, vet bills, etc.
-
Accused Game Cheater gets Knife Through Head and Lives
My only question is who the [bleep] brings a foot long rusty knife with them when they go to play video games? Holy [cabbage] I've been doing it wrong.
- Dope.
-
God- discussion of any Godly/religous issues.
Have we ever had an atheist president? Unless you mean Presidents of different countries than the United States.
- Today...
- Dope.
-
Today...
Ah, I hate prompts or questions like that. I always know someone encouraged me at one point of my life, I just can't think of any examples. Those are fun, you just make up a story with varying levels of ridiculousness depending on how confident you are in your writing abilities. And if it's in response to a story where you're supposed to relate to the character, always say that the exact same thing happened to you. It's fun, easy, and satisfying to know that you're going to frustrate the hell out of whoever is grading it since they know it's bull [cabbage], but can't grade you worse since they can't prove it.
- Today...
- Today...
-
Google vs. China
Don't they already censor the [cabbage] out of everything? Well, to a greater extreme than they already are. Doing things like blocking all search engines, all blogging sites, preventing access to any sites from certain countries, and eventually making it so the only websites that can be accessed are those run by the Chinese government themselves. Basically allowing China to put their spin on the past, modify current events to their liking, and even to try to bend the future to how they want it. Unlikely that it will be that extreme, but I'm honestly not all that up to date on Chinese affairs and their stance on the internet. It's something I've been meaning to put some more research into.
-
God- discussion of any Godly/religous issues.
The point is that if you said the sun doesn't exist, he could easily just point up at the sky and say "There it is." Therefore he was able to prove you wrong, and was the one arguing for existence. Conversely if I say that bigfoot exists and I've seen him, the burden isn't on you to search the world for bigfoot to prove me wrong, it would be on me to show you bigfoot. Of course it's never that clear, especially in some situations. An example of this would be anything that has evidence to suggest it's existence due to it filling a void of sorts where understanding is limited. A non-religious example (for the most part) would be the Higgs Boson or God particle. I don't know too much about it so I'm not going to get into any detail, but there are theories that suggest the existence of this particle and there are few other things that could take it's place, yet there is no concrete proof of its existence. Because of this, while the burden of proof is mainly on those who claim it exists, there is also some burden on those who say it doesn't because of how it fills in the gaps. In many ways I believe that burden of proof is similar in the religious context. The fact that a deity isn't something we can sense means that someone needs to give evidence of it, but the way a deity can explain the unexplained and unexplainable makes it hard to disprove as well. Unfortunately, deities have historically existed to explain things that we otherwise cannot, so the credibility of this "void filling" idea being used as an argument for existence is damaged.