insane

...is the new release from Copeland. They were an independently signed band until November, when they signed with Columbia records. Their latest album "Eat, Sleep, Repeat" is their last record recorded with the Militia Group and it's absolutely incredible. If you check their myplace (my[place].com/copeland) there's a few songs to listen to (the second and third tracks are from the new album), but they definitely aren't the best songs on the cd. Any other Copeland fans out there?

I find it ludicrous to think that the very rights Saddam abused (right to life), people think it is good for Saddam to have hidden behind.

I non-intentionally memorize numbers (to extreme decimals) and can recall them years later.

I'm not sure about that. If you're draining the fat, then why not just buy the regular fat beef as the fat will be drained anyways and save yourself some money?

I think the "do you conform?" question should be rephrased to "do you conform for the sake of conforming?".

Heh, no snow days here. Although universities aren't really ever closed... just some profs don't make it in for class :P. The high schools are open too though.

I have two: 1. Egg on chicken noodles. Basically, make chicken Mr. Noodles, but don't break the noodles up, and drain all the water before adding the chicken powder sauce thing. So you have dry chicken noodles, and put the plain omlette on top. Eat with chopsticks. 2. Fry an egg. Fry 2 pieces of bacon. Fry a hasbrown patty. Put all inbetween 2 pieces of texas toast and add cheese liberally. Add bbq sauce and dip in ketchup.

I own three party hats and a blue mask.

It actually reached 12th. I'm not sure about the motives behind it dropping in the charts that you gave though, I couldn't find anything on that.

Darren.

Yeah, it's definitely not for everyone. But I got hooked on when I got the feeling of how vast the Middle Earth is or how rich the history Tolkien made it to be. Man, reading through the Silmarillion was incredible.

Product rule is differentiation. The integral method of product rule is called integration by parts.

The wolfram integrator puts it in extremely odd forms, I've found. Anyways, azn, mxm and punky, those were both extremely helpful, thanks a bunch!

You are extremely far off, to the point that I don't think you know what integration is.

That's a definite integral, which returns a value. My question is an indefinite integral, which returns a function.

I've spent 3 hours on this problem, and I'm guessing I'm missing something extremely simple. If any of you know how to integrate functions, I'd be obliged if you could give me a hand. ÃÆâÃâ¹Ã¢â¬Â Ãâë [x^3 * ÃÆâÃâ¹Ã¢â¬Â Ãâ¦Ã¡(x^2 + 1)] dx I'm totally stuck. And please don't respond unless you actually know how to integrate :P

You mean you want the actual source code to the game? Or just the link to the world?

That's a self-refuting statement. Is it absolutely true that there is only one absolute in the world? If so, then that makes two absolutes, and your statement is void.

Why would you "hide" behind it? What does it conceal? Surely the world would be a much easier place if right and wrong were absolutes? You hide behind relativism to justify any action you make. I killed five people? Who cares! That's right for me! My response was mainly retaliation to your calling absolutism and theism a fiction without any shred of proof. Of course, both are basic beliefs, just like your atheism and relativism are basic beliefs, so no evidence can really be brought. That's what makes calling one belief a fiction as an insult so heinous.

And to FuBai - if you don't believe in God, you can do whatever the hell you want and hide behind your relativism. Such a convenient belief.

Hey now, the NHL capped salaries :P

Does that make it right? Right or wrong ar not absolute. That is a basic belief. One ShadowFax doesn't prescribe to.

I know man, just trying to spark some arguments myself But infatuation freely leads to love. Infatuation leads to selfish actions. Love is selfless. Love cannot be forced. If love came out of an arranged marriage, it was not forced love. The conditions through which the love grew may have been forced, but the love was not.

So you'd spend the rest of your life living with someone you don't love? I'm just playing devil's advocate. But my point stands. You don't just "love" someone. You learn to love someone. Love isn't the butterflies you get in your stomach when you see someone. That's infatuation. So theoretically, you could learn to love the person you are in an arranged marriage with.

I think what you need to take into consideration is that there isn't "the one". If there isn't "the one", it would mean that theoretically you could learn to be with anyone for the rest of your life.