In the spirit of lulz, let us dissect your argument for the lulz: Extremely ambiguous claim. You are either trying to say that the stereotype for males is undergoing a "gross dominance" of the majority involved in popularizing stereotypes, i.e. males that do not fit the stereotype feel alienated. Or you are trying to say that what is manly in our "patriarchal" society has the position of gross dominance. Either way, you seem to be taking some cooped up, and emotional, disdain for society as a whole and funneling it into an entirely unbased and relatively (relative to +50 years ago, and many countries where men actually do get preferential treatment and are expected to behave certain ways i.e. Mexico, the middle east, etc) inappropriate direction. This can be solved by using a handy-dandy dictionary. Attempting to question the accepted definition of a very common word, or even equate it to another common word like "chauvinistic" isn't going to do much for your argument. Manliness is defined by the society and context in which it is being used. If, in Canada, people see the Facebook page and define manliness as ice-fishing and eating spicy foods, let it be so. Are you too dense to see that the creator of the group may not have an identical, but equally valid, perception of manliness? And what is it that you are arguing? I don't even think you know. You seem to be in limbo between attacking the way our society perceives manliness different than you, and how society lets patriarchy rule. I really hope you live somewhere like Saudi Arabia, because in that case you would have a shred of credibility in saying that society is controlled by men. But if you do not, it would be obvious you're willfully ignorant of the political and sociological systems that even feminists now-a-days approve of. We can only aspire to understand the complex nuances of your unraveled intellect that briefly graced this otherwise pedantic thread, Sir!