adam_ross0 Posted March 15, 2007 Share Posted March 15, 2007 There was no 9/11 conspiracy. The terrorists attacked the Twin Towers, as they were key points vital to our economy. And since we weren't as secure, they took the plane, and drove them into the towers. All they needed to do was capture a plane. Ever since then, our econmy has gotten barely better...we are headed for a recession. And another thing, WHY would the government bomb the Pentagon..the one thing keeping our nation from being overrun with terrorists or suicide bombers? They would screw themselves over. And why would they bomb those towers anyway? What motive would they have? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viktorkrum77 Posted March 15, 2007 Share Posted March 15, 2007 And why would they bomb those towers anyway? What motive would they have? Exactly, why would a Republican government destroy the headquarters and offices of corporations like Morgan Stanley, Fiduciary Trust, Cantor Fitzgerald, Marsh USA, Bank of America, AON, Fuji Bank, Salomon Smith Barney (Now Citigroup), etc. Me doing staff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magekillr Posted March 15, 2007 Share Posted March 15, 2007 And why would they bomb those towers anyway? What motive would they have? Exactly, why would a Republican government destroy the headquarters and offices of corporations like Morgan Stanley, Fiduciary Trust, Cantor Fitzgerald, Marsh USA, Bank of America, AON, Fuji Bank, Salomon Smith Barney (Now Citigroup), etc. "for a reason to go to war" lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warri0r45 Posted March 15, 2007 Share Posted March 15, 2007 And why would they bomb those towers anyway? What motive would they have? Exactly, why would a Republican government destroy the headquarters and offices of corporations like Morgan Stanley, Fiduciary Trust, Cantor Fitzgerald, Marsh USA, Bank of America, AON, Fuji Bank, Salomon Smith Barney (Now Citigroup), etc. "for a reason to go to war" lol If that were at all true then it would be hands down the sickest and most demonistic thing I have ever heard of in my entire life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mercifull Posted March 15, 2007 Share Posted March 15, 2007 If America wanted to go to war with Afganistan/Iraq they didnt need to fake 9/11 in order to do so. Mercifull <3 Suzi "We don't want players to be able to buy their way to success in RuneScape. If we let players start doing this, it devalues RuneScape for others. We feel your status in real-life shouldn't affect your ability to be successful in RuneScape" Jagex 01/04/01 - 02/03/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
honeo Posted March 16, 2007 Share Posted March 16, 2007 If America wanted to go to war with Afganistan/Iraq they didnt need to fake 9/11 in order to do so. This is true. But 9/11 gave the American people a reason to back up our country 100% in going to war. It would have been Vietnam all over again. Most people would start asking questions, like... "Why are we going to war with them again?" Sure, to stop a terrorist at large, maybe... Or maybe for the oil? Training my pure! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satenza Posted March 16, 2007 Share Posted March 16, 2007 That gash doesn't look dangerous enough to destroy the whole building. Even so, WTC7 went down demo style. That gash doesn't explain that. With so many trees in the city you could see the spring coming each day until a night of warm wind would bring it suddenly in one morning. Sometimes the heavy cold rains would beat it back so that it would seem that it would never come and that you were losing a season out of your life. But you knew that there would always be the spring as you knew the river would flow again after it was frozen. When the cold rains kept on and killed the spring, it was as though a young person had died for no reason. In those days though the spring always came finally but it was frightening that it had nearly failed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam_ross0 Posted March 16, 2007 Share Posted March 16, 2007 That gash doesn't look dangerous enough to destroy the whole building. Even so, WTC7 went down demo style. That gash doesn't explain that. It's about an 18 story gash.. I want to say, that if a skyscraper like THAT has an 18-story gash, the weight will be unbalanced, and the tower will topple sooner or later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viktorkrum77 Posted March 16, 2007 Share Posted March 16, 2007 That gash doesn't look dangerous enough to destroy the whole building. Even so, WTC7 went down demo style. That gash doesn't explain that. It's about an 18 story gash.. I want to say, that if a skyscraper like THAT has an 18-story gash, the weight will be unbalanced, and the tower will topple sooner or later. The building did not collapse symmetrical. It collapsed leaning to that side, and the north side fell first. It's impossible that it's a CD, thermite is the only option available, which is still out of the question if you understand the physics of thermite. Me doing staff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Dragon_Reborn Posted March 16, 2007 Share Posted March 16, 2007 Havent you guys watched South Park recently? The Hardly Boys discovered that it was only a bunch of crazy terrorists who destroyed the twin towers, while they were also solving the mystery of the urinal duece. Hardly Boys pwn you. ~~Let The Dragon ride again, on the winds of time~~I've always felt as if I'm the only person who can understand the concept of sarcasm on the internet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tigra00 Posted March 16, 2007 Share Posted March 16, 2007 Havent you guys watched South Park recently? The Hardly Boys discovered that it was only a bunch of crazy terrorists who destroyed the twin towers, while they were also solving the mystery of the urinal duece. Hardly Boys pwn you. I have a raging clue right now. And it's saying that you're right. The popularity of any given religion today depends on the victories of the wars they fought in the past. - Me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manimgoodatrunescape Posted March 16, 2007 Share Posted March 16, 2007 loose change parts 1 2 and 3 all you need brother yo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tigra00 Posted March 16, 2007 Share Posted March 16, 2007 loose change parts 1 2 and 3 all you need brother If the government had no problem killing 3,000 of it's own people, it'd have no probably killing the creator's of that video. THAT'S all you need. The popularity of any given religion today depends on the victories of the wars they fought in the past. - Me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Dragon_Reborn Posted March 16, 2007 Share Posted March 16, 2007 loose change parts 1 2 and 3 all you need brother If the government had no problem killing 3,000 of it's own people, it'd have no probably killing the creator's of that video. THAT'S all you need. Pwned. I watched one of the loose change videos, and it was convincing at first, until I actually looked at some real evidence. ~~Let The Dragon ride again, on the winds of time~~I've always felt as if I'm the only person who can understand the concept of sarcasm on the internet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4737_Carlin Posted March 18, 2007 Share Posted March 18, 2007 loose change parts 1 2 and 3 all you need brother If the government had no problem killing 3,000 of it's own people, it'd have no probably killing the creator's of that video. THAT'S all you need. Pwned. I watched one of the loose change videos, and it was convincing at first, until I actually looked at some real evidence. if they killed the ppl that made that video then evry1 would know it was them that attacked the towers :roll: :roll: :roll: Evolution is a philosophy unsupported by the majority of scientific observations whose influence has been a detriment to society and true scientific advancement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rodl Posted March 18, 2007 Share Posted March 18, 2007 WOW. First the Noah's ark, now this. Defender your threads and posts keep on surprising me. At first you were 100% sure Noah's ark existed and there was a massive flood, now this? It's like the loose change 9/11 conspiracy. Read about it here: http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net ... 911_morons Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyM Posted March 21, 2007 Share Posted March 21, 2007 I watched a video that my bro showed me and you could see bombs exploding by the windows of one of the towers before the plane even hit it. [Admin Edit: Attempting to publicly humiliate a user in your signature is inappropriate] Quit Runescape... Dec 2001 - Jan 2008 on and off... mostly off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No_OnE Posted March 21, 2007 Share Posted March 21, 2007 loose change parts 1 2 and 3 all you need brother If the government had no problem killing 3,000 of it's own people, it'd have no probably killing the creator's of that video. THAT'S all you need. Pwned. I watched one of the loose change videos, and it was convincing at first, until I actually looked at some real evidence. if they killed the ppl that made that video then evry1 would know it was them that attacked the towers :roll: :roll: :roll: If they had the power to kill 3,000 people and successfully lie about it, they would have no problem hiding the deaths of the creators of these videos. I would argue against the whole conspiracy thing but Viktor and the others are doing a pretty good job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilrodyle Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 Alright I got a few questions... First of all, why did the towers both fall at about free fall speed? There was only damage to the mid-top of the building, the floor levels were fine which should have provided resistance. This means there is no way it should have gone down at free fall speed. Secondly, WTC7 was absolutely unharmed compared to the other WTC buildings, and none of them went down. There was no reason that building should have went down at all, but it did, and it collapsed demo style. Dagannoth Slayer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
misterxman Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 Evilrodyle, you have to take into consideration that the engineering and physics behind such buildings are way more complicated than they seem to be. There are a lot more factors than just "only damage to the mid-top of the building, the floor levels were fine", and if engineering problems were that easy to predict, everyone would be an engineer. Pixel sigs by me.Pixel Art Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viktorkrum77 Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 Alright I got a few questions... First of all, why did the towers both fall at about free fall speed? There was only damage to the mid-top of the building, the floor levels were fine which should have provided resistance. This means there is no way it should have gone down at free fall speed. Secondly, WTC7 was absolutely unharmed compared to the other WTC buildings, and none of them went down. There was no reason that building should have went down at all, but it did, and it collapsed demo style. 1. Kinetic Energy The other floors held no resistance to the collapsing floors. Gravity did the rest. 2. There was damage including an 18 story gash in the lower corner, and intense fires. Me doing staff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
megakiller32 Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 Did you also realise that America and the UK have different time zones? :shock: Maybe that explains the 23 minute time difference :shock: :shock: Just go watch the South Park episode "Mystery of the Urinal Device" or its called something like that :XD: Just out of interest, how many times has this topic been posted? \ Tip.it is attracting all kinds of kooky nut-jobs these days :shock: Quit Runescape 30th May 2006.Thanks to Hawkxs for my signature :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pault Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08va1i6LYPc James Fetzer for 9/11 truth appears on Hannity and Colmes^. Colmes accidentally asks him an open ended question, and Fetzer explains how Cheney knew the plane was coming in toward the pentagon and how there were orders not to shoot it down. Proof was in the testimony of Norman Mineta. The next day, Mineta was fired from the Bush Administration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magekillr Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 there was no conspiracy my gosh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pault Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 my gosh Why was Mineta fired? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now