Smapla Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 okay so, right now we're getting hammered by hello13124, posting a keylogger in every forum, multiple times. this is [cabbage]. I suggest that new users have a limitation of posting one topic per 10 minutes. no new player should have to post that many topics in such a short time. If they have multiple questions, they should have a single topic in help and advice containing all their questions. perhaps when they reach 100 posts or so, the limitation can be removed. note, this wouldn't effect topic replies, just new topic creation. another thing, the time limit on reporting topics is annoying, and it should be decreased when a forum user is identified as being a very good topic reporter, by which i mean they have reported a lot of topics, and 90% of the reports are legitimate. Please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warrager Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 Wayyyyy tooooo longggggg. All I got to say. So what if you post a bank sale, later you need to ask a question, 10 minutes!!!!! Make it like 1-2 minutes, as by this time, the spammer is neutralized... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smapla Posted September 22, 2007 Author Share Posted September 22, 2007 Wayyyyy tooooo longggggg. All I got to say. So what if you post a bank sale, later you need to ask a question, 10 minutes!!!!! Make it like 1-2 minutes, as by this time, the spammer is neutralized... obviously you aren't seeing this guy spamming. go search his posts, "hello13124" he's been at it for like half an hour, and no mods have shown up. as i said, i'm talking about newbies to the forum, people that have just joined. If you joined the forums just to make selling posts, I don't think these forums are right for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Devoted12- Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 Mods will take care of it. I and a couple of others took care of this guy and now there is nothing to worry about. Anyways, has already been suggested... http://forum.tip.it/viewtopic.php?t=700633 In there, you will see why it is not probable to implement something such as this. Just report the post and move on. Mod's will take care of it and appropriate action will be taken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mchainmail Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 Would it be possible to stop people from posting links until they have a certain post count, maybe 15-50? It's enough to delay spammers, and most genuine new members shouldn't be needing to link to stuff. (They can still post images and quote text to show what they mean.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InkofDeath Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 Don't limit people on what they can do, just because of the minority doesn't mean the majority overall should have to be affected. This should be locked, sicne it relates to the topic devoted posted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkblade986 Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 Would it be possible to stop people from posting links until they have a certain post count, maybe 15-50? It's enough to delay spammers, and most genuine new members shouldn't be needing to link to stuff. (They can still post images and quote text to show what they mean.) Preventing people from posting links really isn't a plausable option. People can always find ways to get around the censor that would prevent people from posting links. Also, disabling BBCode or HTML for one specific group of people isn't possible as far as I know. The best you can do is report these posters and the first moderator to get around to it will handle it. don't worry, you are going to "hell" anyway. wanna race to see who gets there first?Officially reached 100 Combat at 1:33PM EST, June 14, 2007First Dragon Drop: Dragon Chain (Dust Devils) @ 10:48PM EST, July 14, 2008, lv113 combat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbellz Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 Don't limit people on what they can do, just because of the minority doesn't mean the majority overall should have to be affected. If only the American Government could be based on that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkblade986 Posted September 23, 2007 Share Posted September 23, 2007 Don't limit people on what they can do, just because of the minority doesn't mean the majority overall should have to be affected. If only the American Government could be based on that. There's a little difference here. Making a change so that people can't lose access to a piece of data isn't quite of as much importance as would be a change that would help save millions of lives. Data can be replaced; Lives can't. don't worry, you are going to "hell" anyway. wanna race to see who gets there first?Officially reached 100 Combat at 1:33PM EST, June 14, 2007First Dragon Drop: Dragon Chain (Dust Devils) @ 10:48PM EST, July 14, 2008, lv113 combat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginger_Warrior Posted September 23, 2007 Share Posted September 23, 2007 Don't limit people on what they can do, just because of the minority doesn't mean the majority overall should have to be affected. If only the American Government could be based on that. I could go into the finer irony of that comment, but I won't. :? As -devoted- said, mods can deal with things like this pretty well as it is. There's no need to place sanctions on everyone for an annoyance so small being commited by such a minute group of people. | Favourite Game Music | Last.fm | HYT Friend Chat Rules | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mchainmail Posted September 23, 2007 Share Posted September 23, 2007 Would it be possible to stop people from posting links until they have a certain post count, maybe 15-50? It's enough to delay spammers, and most genuine new members shouldn't be needing to link to stuff. (They can still post images and quote text to show what they mean.) Preventing people from posting links really isn't a plausable option. People can always find ways to get around the censor that would prevent people from posting links. Also, disabling BBCode or HTML for one specific group of people isn't possible as far as I know. The best you can do is report these posters and the first moderator to get around to it will handle it. Okay, I didn't know what is and isn't possible to do on phpBB. I just thought I'd throw the idea out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InkofDeath Posted September 23, 2007 Share Posted September 23, 2007 Also, disabling BBCode or HTML for one specific group of people isn't possible as far as I know. The best you can do is report these posters and the first moderator to get around to it will handle it. It's possible as far as my knowledge goes? Though I don't know enough of php yet to actually confirm that. :-# Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam007 Posted September 23, 2007 Share Posted September 23, 2007 While I don't agree entirely on the subject of your post, I did remember an issue that should be looked at. I don't know if it's possible, but I don't think people should be able to edit in new links after making their first thread post. Someone could easily link to one thing, people could reply saying it's fine and everything, then the original thread creator can edit the original link a day later with a keylogger link, and nobody would know the difference until it was too late. Anything doable about that? Could just not be an issue with pursuing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albosky Posted September 23, 2007 Share Posted September 23, 2007 Myabe I'm just crazy , but our log of it shows that particular user starting his link spamming at 3:08pm and two global mods starting removing the posts at 3:20pm and the user was banned at 3:32pm. 24 minute response and cleanup time is pretty damn good for a bunch of volunteers I would think. :-k I like to fart silently but deadly in movie theatersArd Choille says (11:41 PM):I wouldn't dare tell you what to do m'dear Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbellz Posted September 23, 2007 Share Posted September 23, 2007 Forget it. I'm just saying the American Government has a couple flaws in our system. Anyways, I havn't seen any of those keylogger spammers in a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tripsis Posted September 23, 2007 Share Posted September 23, 2007 the time limit on reporting topics is annoying, and it should be decreased when a forum user is identified as being a very good topic reporter, by which i mean they have reported a lot of topics, and 90% of the reports are legitimate. With a spammer like this, you really don't need to go through their history and report every single one of their threads. Report one and say, "THey have more, they're spamming." Then the moderator knows that they should look through the user's history and remove all of their threads. Makes things a lot easier on you ;) - 99 fletching | 99 thieving | 99 construction | 99 herblore | 99 smithing | 99 woodcutting - - 99 runecrafting - 99 prayer - 125 combat - 95 farming - - Blog - DeviantART - Book Reviews & Blog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mario_sunny Posted September 26, 2007 Share Posted September 26, 2007 Myabe I'm just crazy , but our log of it shows that particular user starting his link spamming at 3:08pm and two global mods starting removing the posts at 3:20pm and the user was banned at 3:32pm. 24 minute response and cleanup time is pretty damn good for a bunch of volunteers I would think. :-k Tip.it staff > keyloggers :) While I don't agree entirely on the subject of your post, I did remember an issue that should be looked at. I don't know if it's possible, but I don't think people should be able to edit in new links after making their first thread post. Someone could easily link to one thing, people could reply saying it's fine and everything, then the original thread creator can edit the original link a day later with a keylogger link, and nobody would know the difference until it was too late. Anything doable about that? Could just not be an issue with pursuing. It's a nice idea, but what if you're *not* a keylogger and you accidentally put the wrong link in your post to say, a youtube video? Obviously you'd want to edit it and put in the good link. Although people seem to be opposed to the "low posters should not be able to do this... blah blah blah" this could be something to consider. Perhaps users with less than 100 posts could not edit their links? By 100 posts I think we can confirm most of them are not keyloggers(keyloggers would be frustrated getting in 100 non-rule breaking posts just to post a keylogger link). By popular demand, this signature is back- however I currently do not have a blog up at the moment and if I did I wouldn't update it. Sorry, the sig links to nowhere :( . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkblade986 Posted September 26, 2007 Share Posted September 26, 2007 By putting post count limitations on people, it would encourage spamming. Someone could go to one of the lesser used boards towards the bottom of the page, spam to high heaven until they have 100 posts, and then go link spamming. Given, there's a better chance they'll be caught first, there's still the chance. don't worry, you are going to "hell" anyway. wanna race to see who gets there first?Officially reached 100 Combat at 1:33PM EST, June 14, 2007First Dragon Drop: Dragon Chain (Dust Devils) @ 10:48PM EST, July 14, 2008, lv113 combat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InkofDeath Posted September 26, 2007 Share Posted September 26, 2007 Maybe its time to blacklist post count requirement suggestions? : Although people seem to be opposed to the "low posters should not be able to do this... blah blah blah" this could be something to consider. Perhaps users with less than 100 posts could not edit their links? By 100 posts I think we can confirm most of them are not keyloggers(keyloggers would be frustrated getting in 100 non-rule breaking posts just to post a keylogger link). So they get 100 posts, then they post a keylogger, I'm sure 60% of the users will trust the link if its professional looking since the user has 100 posts. Limitations don't work out, and I don't see how they ever could Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mario_sunny Posted September 27, 2007 Share Posted September 27, 2007 Maybe its time to blacklist post count requirement suggestions? : Although people seem to be opposed to the "low posters should not be able to do this... blah blah blah" this could be something to consider. Perhaps users with less than 100 posts could not edit their links? By 100 posts I think we can confirm most of them are not keyloggers(keyloggers would be frustrated getting in 100 non-rule breaking posts just to post a keylogger link). So they get 100 posts, then they post a keylogger, I'm sure 60% of the users will trust the link if its professional looking since the user has 100 posts. Limitations don't work out, and I don't see how they ever could I was expecting this answer; very well. By popular demand, this signature is back- however I currently do not have a blog up at the moment and if I did I wouldn't update it. Sorry, the sig links to nowhere :( . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freesia Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 Maybe an announcement on this issue could raise public awareness for the time being, reducing cases of users falling victim to it. Strangely with WotLK so near, I wished I could delay it a bit to push through that last TBC content in MH/BT :'(. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McGuff1 Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 Until we can come up with a better solution use the Report Button "!" as soon as you see a new one of these. That will get our attention the fastest. =D> McGuff1 tip.it Super Moderator Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meol Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 In order to read most forums, you need an account, right? Having a minimum post-requirement wouldn't work because it would increase spam, but why not have an time-requirement to start a thread? This signature is intentionally left blank. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mercifull Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 New users unable to use bbcode for 24 hours New users unable to post links for 72 hours (3 days) + post count of 25 (posts are added to a moderation queue perhaps) New users younger than 72 hours or less than 25 posts only able to post one new topic thread an hour. This still allows the new user to post whatever question they perhaps signed up for to ask and also to make an introductory thread or even to create a post in the market boards. Not sure how possible those modifications are, I know they are not available in vanilla phpbb. This is likely to prevent immediate signup and spamming. Also it acts as a deterrant in that the spammer may not be bothered waiting for days and spending time posting legitamate posts before they are able to post their spam. Mercifull <3 Suzi "We don't want players to be able to buy their way to success in RuneScape. If we let players start doing this, it devalues RuneScape for others. We feel your status in real-life shouldn't affect your ability to be successful in RuneScape" Jagex 01/04/01 - 02/03/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 New users unable to use bbcode for 24 hours New users unable to post links for 72 hours (3 days) + post count of 25 (posts are added to a moderation queue perhaps) New users younger than 72 hours or less than 25 posts only able to post one new topic thread an hour. This still allows the new user to post whatever question they perhaps signed up for to ask and also to make an introductory thread or even to create a post in the market boards. Not sure how possible those modifications are, I know they are not available in vanilla phpbb. This is likely to prevent immediate signup and spamming. Also it acts as a deterrant in that the spammer may not be bothered waiting for days and spending time posting legitamate posts before they are able to post their spam. Good ideas Merc. I can't see any flaws in them and I'd be happy to see any of these implemented. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now