as well as the international panel on climate change.

 

 

 

could this possible become a presidential run? I hope so. I bet he would beat any republican candidate, the tough part would be getting the democratic nomination.

 

 

 

Its kinda ironic, Gore, who lost in 2000 is winning a peace prize, while Bush who won in 2000 is horribly mishandling a war.

Is this serial?

He isn't running for President. He's said it 1,000,000 times and he even said it today. Twice.

 

 

 

Anyone could beat a republican candidate right now. I personally could do it with a pro-nuke-America agenda. That's how little of a chance Republicans have of winning. Zero.

 

 

 

Bow to Hilary Clinton, she's already won, apparently.

I don't have any respect for a man who tells me to cut my electrical bill whilst he lives in a mansion and uses 100x more than me.

 

 

 

, Gore came under criticism from the conservative think tank Tennessee Center for Policy Research.[15] The organization issued a report which said that during August 2006 Gore's household consumed 22,619 kilowatt-hours ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Ã

I don't have any respect for a man who tells me to cut my electrical bill whilst he lives in a mansion and uses 100x more than me.

 

 

 

, Gore came under criticism from the conservative think tank Tennessee Center for Policy Research.[15] The organization issued a report which said that during August 2006 Gore's household consumed 22,619 kilowatt-hours ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Ã

Just because there's one factor that has absolutely nothing to do with us doesn't mean the problem altogether has nothing to do with us. It's just one of many factors contributing to global warming - there's no doubting human activity has a contribution to global warming.

 

 

 

Thus, it is our problem.

Just because there's one factor that has absolutely nothing to do with us doesn't mean the problem altogether has nothing to do with us. It's just one of many factors contributing to global warming - there's no doubting human activity has a contribution to global warming.

 

 

 

Thus, it is our problem.

 

 

 

Can you prove it has had anything to do with humans?

 

 

 

Pollution is often rather localized. Even air pollution. Sure, it can travel many miles, even across states, but there are remote locations of the Earth where people are having to move away from the shore because it is eroding. I've read thing about how volcanic eruptions on Earth everyday put out more pollution and Co2 than humans do in a year or whatever, so yea...

 

 

 

Humans are responsible for things like acid rain and crappy local air quality...Places like L.A., you know. That comes from our factories and cars. The entire Earth going into a tail-spin, melting itself down and generally fudgin' itself up...That's not our doing. We're not that damn powerful.

 

 

 

I predict that if we were all to never drive a car again from here on-out, the Earth would still continue doing this. Of course, some people would then just say we've already done the damage and it's too late, but...Some people are stupid. ;) The Earth has healed itself before and will continue to do so until it is engulfed by the sun in a few billion years (or God punts it like a football...Whichever...), it's never going to be "too late" unless the sun keeps acting up. And we can't control that.

 

 

 

We should, of course, push for better alternative fuels just on principle, but not the principle of "Global Warming".

 

 

 

Edit: I'd just also like to point out that scientists have said we had X number of years before everything is complete crap and not salvageable, and this number has been going down in years every minute as things get worse faster than they expected (even though pollution hasn't gotten dramatically worse, while warming has), it's pretty obvious that is because they plugged the wrong number into the equation, and that number is human factor when it should be sun factor.

I don't have any respect for a man who tells me to cut my electrical bill whilst he lives in a mansion and uses 100x more than me.

 

 

 

, Gore came under criticism from the conservative think tank Tennessee Center for Policy Research.[15] The organization issued a report which said that during August 2006 Gore's household consumed 22,619 kilowatt-hours ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Ã

I don't have any respect for a man who tells me to cut my electrical bill whilst he lives in a mansion and uses 100x more than me.

 

 

 

, Gore came under criticism from the conservative think tank Tennessee Center for Policy Research.[15] The organization issued a report which said that during August 2006 Gore's household consumed 22,619 kilowatt-hours ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Ã

[hide]

I don't have any respect for a man who tells me to cut my electrical bill whilst he lives in a mansion and uses 100x more than me.

 

 

 

, Gore came under criticism from the conservative think tank Tennessee Center for Policy Research.[15] The organization issued a report which said that during August 2006 Gore's household consumed 22,619 kilowatt-hours ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Ã

We all hate Gore in the same way that we hate Paris Hilton. No need to discuss it.

I don't have any respect for a man who tells me to cut my electrical bill whilst he lives in a mansion and uses 100x more than me.

 

 

 

, Gore came under criticism from the conservative think tank Tennessee Center for Policy Research.[15] The organization issued a report which said that during August 2006 Gore's household consumed 22,619 kilowatt-hours ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Ã

That's a damn lie. I do not hate Al Gore for starring in an inadequate porn movie.

 

 

 

At least, I don't think I do...

[hide]

I don't have any respect for a man who tells me to cut my electrical bill whilst he lives in a mansion and uses 100x more than me.

 

 

 

, Gore came under criticism from the conservative think tank Tennessee Center for Policy Research.[15] The organization issued a report which said that during August 2006 Gore's household consumed 22,619 kilowatt-hours ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Ã

Carbon offsets are among the biggest frauds we have. The people do, indeed, plant trees or whatever in exchange for the money, but the people who buy them are just under the impression that they can do whatever they want as long as they have the cash to buy a few trees.

Seems like a politically safe choice for an award that should be objective.

If Al Gore wins the Nobel for his documentary, Highlanders deserves to be the supreme overlord of Earth.

If Al Gore wins the Nobel for his documentary, Highlanders deserves to be the supreme overlord of Earth.

 

 

 

:lol:

 

 

 

Sorry, there can be only one.

 

 

 

And it is Al Gore.

 

 

 

/weep

i have a deep hatred for al gore so naturally im pissed oh well i still think hes a loser :P

He has said so many times he isn't running for president and he said global warming would be better without him not being president or something like that.

 

 

 

But I still think the lady who sheltered jews during the Halocaust deserved it more :P.

With all this president talk, is Stephen Colbert seriously going to run for president, or was he speaking in character when he said that?

With all this president talk, is Stephen Colbert seriously going to run for president, or was he speaking in character when he said that?

 

 

 

I'd vote for him or his character over al gore.

Al Gore sucks, what the hell did he do for the world? what a [wagon]

O well Al Gore wins whoopy? He had a good documenttary but he shouldn't have won it. I hope he's not gonna be president next :ohnoes:

Can anybody tell me the what the link is between global warming and (world) peace? I didn't watch the news yesterday, so I don't know the Nobel comittee's reasoning behind it. Bono or Kohl would've been more suitable in my layman's eyes..