Wow, guys. Are you serious right now? This is like watching 3rd graders try to win imagination game at recess by making themselves "everything-proof".

 

 

 

No, I'm pretty sure we're not.

Successful troll is successful.

 

 

 

And @ the knife vs. Machete question... I'd say either is probably good, I just copied the list from the guide though.

Successful troll is successful.

 

 

 

And @ the knife vs. Machete question... I'd say either is probably good, I just copied the list from the guide though.

 

 

 

I think a machete would be more durable.

Successful troll is successful.

 

 

 

And @ the knife vs. Machete question... I'd say either is probably good, I just copied the list from the guide though.

 

 

 

I think a machete would be more durable.

 

Depends on the knife. A good folding knife is easier to carry with out risk of cutting yourself and the blade is less likely to chip, dull, or dent if you drop it. With a group there's no reason not to have machetes and knives though.

Successful troll is successful.

 

 

 

And @ the knife vs. Machete question... I'd say either is probably good, I just copied the list from the guide though.

 

 

 

I think a machete would be more durable.

 

Depends on the knife. A good folding knife is easier to carry with out risk of cutting yourself and the blade is less likely to chip, dull, or dent if you drop it. With a group there's no reason not to have machetes and knives though.

 

 

 

You'd need a long plade, though.

 

 

 

Also, carry a utility knife with you, the compass and mirrior in some could be really usefull.

Successful troll is successful.

 

 

 

And @ the knife vs. Machete question... I'd say either is probably good, I just copied the list from the guide though.

 

 

 

I think a machete would be more durable.

 

Depends on the knife. A good folding knife is easier to carry with out risk of cutting yourself and the blade is less likely to chip, dull, or dent if you drop it. With a group there's no reason not to have machetes and knives though.

 

Somebody among us (not naming names Skull Emblem) doesn't play COD. Shun him!

 

:cry:

Successful troll is successful.

 

 

 

And @ the knife vs. Machete question... I'd say either is probably good, I just copied the list from the guide though.

 

 

 

I think a machete would be more durable.

 

Depends on the knife. A good folding knife is easier to carry with out risk of cutting yourself and the blade is less likely to chip, dull, or dent if you drop it. With a group there's no reason not to have machetes and knives though.

 

Somebody among us (not naming names Skull Emblem) doesn't play COD. Shun him!

 

:cry:

 

 

 

You know what's even more durable than a knife or machete?

 

The blade is protected so as not to cut anything it's not meant to, and you can fell a zombie in pretty much one slice.

 

[hide=Answer to our problems.][/hide]

 

 

 

[hide=]Those of you who have been following my strategy for the whole zombie invasion will know what's going to come next from me.[/hide]

Good luck finding one in a good working condition, that isn't ceremonial, or ever finding someone with the skill to make them.

You want a knife? Here, have a knife. Seriously though, while a machete is more powerful in combat, a knife is useful for a wide variety of things. You should NEVER be caught without a knife, in any situation. Though, if you can find a good machete, it's advised to get one. They're fairly useful too, if you can actually use them.

Swords are much less durable than a machete. And they are almost impossible to find. At least a real one that is actually designed for combat.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/SHOWBIZ/Movies/04/10/woody.harrelson.zombie/index.html

 

 

 

[hide=Woody Harrelson claims he mistook photographer for zombie]Woody Harrelson claims he mistook photographer for zombie

 

 

 

* Story Highlights

 

* Woody Harrelson defends his clash with a photographer at a New York airport

 

* Statement through publicist says he was still in character from zombie movie

 

* Harrelson: "I quite understandably mistook [the photographer] for a zombie"

 

* Harrelson is being sued by another TMZ photographer for an alleged assault

 

 

 

By Alan Duke

 

CNN

 

 

 

(CNN) -- Woody Harrelson defended his clash with a photographer at a New York airport Wednesday night as a case of mistaken identity -- he says he mistook the cameraman for a zombie.

 

Woody Harrelson says he got into a clash with a photographer because he mistook him for a zombie.

 

 

 

Woody Harrelson says he got into a clash with a photographer because he mistook him for a zombie.

 

 

 

The TMZ photographer filed a complaint with police claiming the actor damaged his camera and pushed him in the face at La Guardia Airport, according to an airport spokesman.

 

 

 

"We're looking into this allegation and if it's warranted, we'll turn it over to the proper authorities," said Port Authority of New York and New Jersey spokesman Ron Marsico.

 

 

 

The photographer, who was not identified, captured the encounter on a small camera after his larger one was broken.

 

 

 

Harrelson, who is being sued by another TMZ photographer for an alleged assault in 2006, did not deny his involvement.

 

 

 

"I wrapped a movie called 'Zombieland,' in which I was constantly under assault by zombies, then flew to New York, still very much in character," Harrelson said in a statement issued Friday by his publicist.

 

 

 

"With my daughter at the airport I was startled by a paparazzo, who I quite understandably mistook for a zombie," he said.

 

 

 

TMZ.com posted two videos of the incident, including one recorded by the larger camera before it was damaged.

 

 

 

The first video shows the photographer following Harrelson and his daughter down an escalator and out of the terminal. It ends with Harrelson apparently reaching for the lens.

 

Don't Miss

 

 

 

* Time: Zombies are the new vampires

 

 

 

The second video begins with the photographer accusing Harrelson of breaking his camera.

 

 

 

After Harrelson returns the camera to him, a scuffle appears to ensue.

 

 

 

"Woody, this is assault. Woody, this is assault," the photographer is heard saying. "Woody, chill out. Would you please chill out?"

 

 

 

The photographer continues to follow Harrelson for another four minutes as the actor and his daughter walk to the airport parking lot. At one point, Harrelson again turns toward the cameraman.

 

 

 

"I'm being chased by Woody Harrelson while I'm talking to you," the photographer says as he talks to an unidentified person on a cell phone.

 

 

 

"He hit me in my face, he broke my friggin' camera, he broke the camera in pieces," he said.

 

 

 

Harrelson, his daughter and a driver get inside an SUV and the encounter ends.

 

 

 

In the movie "Zombieland," Harrelson plays "the most frightened person on Earth" looking for refuge from zombies, according to the Internet Movie Database

 

 

 

Filming on the movie wrapped in Atlanta, Georgia, on Wednesday, according to director Ruben Fleischer's Web site.

 

 

 

TMZ photographer Josh Levine filed a lawsuit against Harrelson last year for an alleged attack outside a Hollywood nightclub in 2006.

 

 

 

Video of that incident, which is also posted on TMZ.com, also appeared to show Harrelson grabbing a camera and clashing with the photographer.

 

 

 

Los Angeles prosecutors declined to press charges against the actor, but Levine filed a suit last summer asking for $2.5 million in damages.

 

 

 

"Woody Harrelson has a history of anger management issues with people and we intend to put a stop to this," Cyrus Nownejad, Levine's lawyer, said Friday.

 

 

 

TMZ is partly owned by AOL, part of CNN's parent company, Time Warner.[/hide]

http://www.cnn.com/2009/SHOWBIZ/Movies/04/10/woody.harrelson.zombie/index.html

 

 

 

[hide=Woody Harrelson claims he mistook photographer for zombie]Jamjamjabberfwaff[/hide]

 

Haha that's great... But in response to why swords shouldn't be used, you need to get the actual battle ready swords instead of those pos stainless steel ones you can pick up at some novelty shop.

Am I allowed to say no-life RS things?

 

 

 

If so :[hide=]*rubs hands together* well, good thing we've been training our smithing![/hide]

Am I allowed to say no-life RS things?

 

 

 

If so :[hide=]*rubs hands together* well, good thing we've been training our smithing![/hide]

 

 

 

No. Just No. Thats incorrect. Go home.

Am I allowed to say no-life RS things?

 

 

 

If so :[hide=]*rubs hands together* well, good thing we've been training our smithing![/hide]

 

 

 

No. Just No. Thats incorrect. Go home.

 

 

 

I lol'd :lol:

 

One feasible option;

 

Set up a barricade in a gun shop.

Am I allowed to say no-life RS things?

 

 

 

If so :[hide=]*rubs hands together* well, good thing we've been training our smithing![/hide]

 

 

 

Sure, lets bang away at bars of metal with a hammer to fashion weapons.

 

 

 

Despite it being totally unrealistic and wouldn't do more than create a few dents/scratches in the metal. True blacksmithing takes alot more work.

Am I allowed to say no-life RS things?

 

 

 

If so :[hide=]*rubs hands together* well, good thing we've been training our smithing![/hide]

 

 

 

Sure, lets bang away at bars of metal with a hammer to fashion weapons.

 

 

 

Despite it being totally unrealistic and wouldn't do more than create a few dents/scratches in the metal. True blacksmithing takes alot more work.

 

 

 

Alright, stop talking about "unrealistic" in a thread about zombie survival.

 

 

 

Smithing would be hilarious, you just made me picture the Black Knight from Monty Python getting his limbs bitten off by zombies :lol:

Look, I'd be fine with it if it didn't refer to RS, and rather reffered to the actual art of smithing in reality.

 

 

 

It'd still be unrealistic to learn how to do it well, but I'd be fine with it, as it has some basis in reality.

Well, it might do good to get ready. http://www.nola.com/news/?/base/news-1/ ... xml&coll=1 This is in New Orleans. Some random dude was bit by another random dude, after which the dude who bit swallowed the chunk that he bit off. He seems like he's just some nut, but you never really know. On a 1-10 scale, this is about a 3 in alertness, I'd say.

It'll just be some nutcase.

 

 

 

For one, the disease wouldn't just infect 1 person, and secondly, wouldn't it be more likely for some scientists to be the first infected by the disease?

It'll just be some nutcase.

 

 

 

For one, the disease wouldn't just infect 1 person, and secondly, wouldn't it be more likely for some scientists to be the first infected by the disease?

 

 

 

 

 

If it's just one person who was initially infected, then it would start out that way.

 

 

 

That would be about equally as likely with a random test subject IF the virus was manmade. New Orleans is surrounded by wetlands, I imagine that there's still some things in there that humans haven't found yet. Random chemicals wouldn't help matters either.

The only way I can see an outbreak, is if the disease escapes, which is more likely to happen from an accident, than from a test subject escaping.

What about this?

 

 

 

Most zombies end up like Romero zombies, but in some cases when a person is heavily infected but the injuries aren't life threatening, they turn without dieing, a living human with the mind of a zombie, but since they haven't died, they can run. Most victims die, but about 1 in every 100 zombies is one of these, called a "runner". They can also die from body shots but have a high threshold of pain.

 

 

 

What do we do about them? Surely there would be a few of these mixed in with the big crowds.

The disease kills in order to "control" the actions of the person.

What about this?

 

 

 

Most zombies end up like Romero zombies, but in some cases when a person is heavily infected but the injuries aren't life threatening, they turn without dieing, a living human with the mind of a zombie, but since they haven't died, they can run. Most victims die, but about 1 in every 100 zombies is one of these, called a "runner". They can also die from body shots but have a high threshold of pain.

 

 

 

What do we do about them? Surely there would be a few of these mixed in with the big crowds.

 

 

 

make sure someone in the group is carrying a shotgun/spear/high calibure sniper rifle