I would consider her a very low person for eating a dog, yes. It does not mean that she is incapable of doing good things, but I believe the act of eating a dog is disgusting.

It sounds more like enforcing your beliefs and values on everyone else, to be perfectly honest. In a way, you've reminded me of the exact reason I don't support most animal welfare charities--if the animal is cute and can be domesticated, it deserves protection; anything else can die.

 

You either believe that animals shouldn't be eaten (an argument which has its own flaws), or you don't. You can't pick and choose which animals deserve to be eaten and which don't, it's rank hypocrisy.

Disgusting is reasonable terminology, but saying it makes someone a very low person whom you despise is pretty close to saying it's "immoral".

 

You either believe that animals shouldn't be eaten (an argument which has its own flaws), or you don't. You can't pick and choose which animals deserve to be eaten and which don't, it's rank hypocrisy.

 

Whatever you want to call it, I see it as purely natural. We think nothing of washing our hands and killing millions of living creatures, yet some of us cry from seeing a single random member of our species die. The closer a living being is to a human in terms of intelligence and physical appearance, the more empathetic we tend to feel about its well-being. Perhaps it's just self-preservation embedded in our biology. Sure it's an unfair system, but nature itself is unfair.

As a person who believes in the idea of survival of the fittest, I see humans at the top of the food chain; we decide which species die and which do not. Of course, as intelligent beings, we need to take into consideration our surroundings (which species are fragile, endangered, etc.), but I don't believe in the zero-sum "all or none" argument.

 

Like I said before, dogs have been purposely domesticated from wild animals to be used as pets and companions, not food.

I think in some places dog would have been bred for the sole purpose of food.

The new Torchwood.

 

What is it with Americans with guns, cheesy acting, explosions and sex?

I thought it was really good. Some of the special effects weren't so brilliant but that's the BBC I guess. It's nowhere near as sex-driven as the second series anyway... I mean that really was ridiculous.

I thought it was really good. Some of the special effects weren't so brilliant but that's the BBC I guess. It's nowhere near as sex-driven as the second series anyway... I mean that really was ridiculous.

 

I expected more after 'Children of Earth' which I thought was probably the 4 best episodes Torchwood have put out (excluding day 1.)

 

Yeah, series 2 was over the top. The majority of the story lines comprised of sexual relationships but looking at that the ending trailer this series could go the same way.

 

Also, series not season.

People that make a situation worse.

ASPCA commercials.

 

 

*fade in of a sad looking hurt animal*

 

donate money nao before we shoot the dog

 

*fade in another animal that looks like it's crying and in pain*

 

nao, do it nao

 

*fade out with another animal that has head and tail down, big round eyes staring up at you*

 

 

 

Whoever made those, die.

When topics move from General Discussion to OT.

 

(hint hint)

 

It's all got a bit perfunctory.

That whole "herp derp," meme, "u mad bro" kinda stuff. It definitely does a lot to destroy any kind of respect I have for whoever said/did/posted it.

Herp Derp is a meme?

Well it caught on and spread through the internet pretty fast, and now I hear people saying it in real life. So yeah, more or less.

I should have clarified that. "An internet meme".

I remember hearing people say herp derp before I was introduced to the internet.

Hmmm, I would label it a phrase commonly used and popularized by the internet.

 

Edit: nvm

Stepping out of the shower, then realizing I forgot to shave.

 

Then remembering I already shaved 2 days ago. But the first one can happen for 5 days in a row. Which makes me look like a serial sex pest.

@Pie: I posted this link on my wall:

http://www.reddit.com/r/AdviceAnimals/search?q=annoying+facebook+girl

 

Needless to say, most people weren't amused. (guilty offenders)

@Pie: I posted this link on my wall:

http://www.reddit.com/r/AdviceAnimals/search?q=annoying+facebook+girl

 

Needless to say, most people weren't amused. (guilty offenders)

 

 

TROLL THEM FOR THE GREATER GOOD.

 

Seriously. People like that piss me off.

@Pie: I posted this link on my wall:

http://www.reddit.com/r/AdviceAnimals/search?q=annoying+facebook+girl

 

Needless to say, most people weren't amused. (guilty offenders)

I am amused. I know too many people like this.

Facebook statuses have shown me that the world is an even bigger hypocrite than I thought.

Reddit.

Reddit is fine for the most part aside from the rage comic [cabbage]. Unless you don't like your precious memes getting exposed to more people I guess.

Reddit is fine for the most part aside from the rage comic [cabbage]. Unless you don't like your precious memes getting exposed to more people I guess.

I don't care for memes, the only thing I KNOW about reddit is the comics they make, which all my friends post on facebook all the time. They're awful.

3 things that really bug me at the moment:

 

1) People who put "Obama", "OBAMAOBAMAOBAMA", "My President is Black!", or any other variation of that as their political view on Facebook.

 

2) People who like a bunch of pages on Facebook saying that they don't like to read, and like an equal number of religious text pages.

 

3) And this girl that I know, took a picture with devils horns and some rock star caption on it...She doesn't even like rock..she likes rap.