Chaotic Rapier vs Longsword

[xpx]

Actaully shows how little you know, go test for yourself. You can argure the raiper is a little bit better for slayer, but when it comes to pvm the cls owns. I can post the math if you guys would liek to see.

 

"more kills with rapier than i would with cls in the same time." would, try it and see your wrong.

Most if not all people here with a rapier agree that the longsword is somewhat better at bandos and sara gwd, as well as being almost identical or minimally better at TD's. Nothing new.

 

If you say that the rapier is a little(around 10-15%) better than cls for slayer, but what about the CLS? if 10-15% is little, what is 5%? marginally? You haven't posted anything new and are stupid in your arguments(hence the ''in the same time'' reference, as you didn't mention any timeframe, 5 kills more every 10 hours would be rubbish, 5 kills every 10 minutes would be incredible, an infinite amount more kills in an infinite amount of time would be...normal.

[ghjkl]

I owned both the cls and rapier at one time.

From my experience, I have gotten an average of 1000000 bandos kills with the cls, and can't even get 1 with the rapier. The cls is obviously superior.

See what I just did there.

[AndJusticeForOne]

I owned both the cls and rapier at one time.

From my experience, I have gotten an average of 1000000 bandos kills with the cls, and can't even get 1 with the rapier. The cls is obviously superior.

See what I just did there.

Ah, I see what you did there.

[Assume Nothing]

I owned both the cls and rapier at one time.

From my experience, I have gotten an average of 1000000 bandos kills with the cls, and can't even get 1 with the rapier. The cls is obviously superior.

See what I just did there.

Try wielding it.

 

On Topic;

 

This thread is getting a little dry and tasteless. Let's dive in the world of what if.

What if Chaotic Weapons worked on the Corporeal beast? Which would be the best weapon, and why.

[stonewall337]

I owned both the cls and rapier at one time.

From my experience, I have gotten an average of 1000000 bandos kills with the cls, and can't even get 1 with the rapier. The cls is obviously superior.

See what I just did there.

Try wielding it.

 

On Topic;

 

This thread is getting a little dry and tasteless. Let's dive in the world of what if.

What if Chaotic Weapons worked on the Corporeal beast? Which would be the best weapon, and why.

Depends on the limiting factor of if stab is needed, CR if so.

[Assume Nothing]

I owned both the cls and rapier at one time.

From my experience, I have gotten an average of 1000000 bandos kills with the cls, and can't even get 1 with the rapier. The cls is obviously superior.

See what I just did there.

Try wielding it.

 

On Topic;

 

This thread is getting a little dry and tasteless. Let's dive in the world of what if.

What if Chaotic Weapons worked on the Corporeal beast? Which would be the best weapon, and why.

Depends on the limiting factor of if stab is needed, CR if so.

CR + Divine Spirit Shield = 2 Kills A Trip? (even with half damage?)

[ghjkl]

You can use a divine with a z spear if you time it right.

[stonewall337]

Well when I used SWH I brought along LBS+Divine

[Zaaps1]

Wait, SWH?

[crashNburn]

Statius warhammer.

[Zaaps1]

Ah, thanks. :thumbup:

[gremmy]

CLS > Rapier

[Assume Nothing]

CLS > Rapier

 

Not really

[gremmy]

Yep, rapier sucks for what I need chaotic for.

[Assume Nothing]

Yep, rapier sucks for what I need chaotic for.

Therefore CLS > Rapier is subjective to you.

[gremmy]

Yep, rapier sucks for what I need chaotic for.

Therefore CLS > Rapier is subjective to you.

 

No, it's not subjective. It's been proven that it's better.

[Assume Nothing]

Yep, rapier sucks for what I need chaotic for.

Therefore CLS > Rapier is subjective to you.

 

No, it's not subjective. It's been proven that it's better.

Proven where

 

Most monsters have so little defence that the Strength bonus doesn't matter. If speed doesn't matter, why not use a Chaotic Maul

[gremmy]

Yep, rapier sucks for what I need chaotic for.

Therefore CLS > Rapier is subjective to you.

 

No, it's not subjective. It's been proven that it's better.

Proven where

 

Most monsters have so little defence that the Strength bonus doesn't matter. If speed doesn't matter, why not use a Chaotic Maul

 

The last 50 pages. Slightly better then Rapier MHing, which is what I need it for. Don't even bother trying to make me regret it.

[Matt_Marche]

Yep, rapier sucks for what I need chaotic for.

Therefore CLS > Rapier is subjective to you.

 

No, it's not subjective. It's been proven that it's better.

Proven where

 

Most monsters have so little defence that the Strength bonus doesn't matter. If speed doesn't matter, why not use a Chaotic Maul

 

The last 50 pages. Slightly better then Rapier MHing, which is what I need it for. Don't even bother trying to make me regret it.

 

Turmoil and extremes say hi.

[gremmy]

Yep, rapier sucks for what I need chaotic for.

Therefore CLS > Rapier is subjective to you.

 

No, it's not subjective. It's been proven that it's better.

Proven where

 

Most monsters have so little defence that the Strength bonus doesn't matter. If speed doesn't matter, why not use a Chaotic Maul

 

The last 50 pages. Slightly better then Rapier MHing, which is what I need it for. Don't even bother trying to make me regret it.

 

Turmoil and extremes say hi.

 

Turmoil, overloads and yak says hi.

[xpx]

Yep, rapier sucks for what I need chaotic for.

Therefore CLS > Rapier is subjective to you.

 

No, it's not subjective. It's been proven that it's better.

Proven where

 

Most monsters have so little defence that the Strength bonus doesn't matter. If speed doesn't matter, why not use a Chaotic Maul

The last 50 pages. Slightly better then Rapier MHing, which is what I need it for. Don't even bother trying to make me regret it.

How is it not subjective when you ignore most of the game? CLS might be better for you, but saying it's a better weapon is just showing how stupid you are. This thread clearly proves that if you are maxed/have turmoil/overloads, rapier is a much better overall weapon.

[Assume Nothing]

Yep, rapier sucks for what I need chaotic for.

Therefore CLS > Rapier is subjective to you.

 

No, it's not subjective. It's been proven that it's better.

Proven where

 

Most monsters have so little defence that the Strength bonus doesn't matter. If speed doesn't matter, why not use a Chaotic Maul

The last 50 pages. Slightly better then Rapier MHing, which is what I need it for. Don't even bother trying to make me regret it.

How is it not subjective when you ignore most of the game? CLS might be better for you, but saying it's a better weapon is just showing how stupid you are. This thread clearly proves that if you are maxed/have turmoil/overloads, rapier is a much better overall weapon.

This

[MstrMonopoly]

Yep, rapier sucks for what I need chaotic for.

Therefore CLS > Rapier is subjective to you.

 

No, it's not subjective. It's been proven that it's better.

Proven where

 

Most monsters have so little defence that the Strength bonus doesn't matter. If speed doesn't matter, why not use a Chaotic Maul

The last 50 pages. Slightly better then Rapier MHing, which is what I need it for. Don't even bother trying to make me regret it.

How is it not subjective when you ignore most of the game? CLS might be better for you, but saying it's a better weapon is just showing how stupid you are. This thread clearly proves that if you are maxed/have turmoil/overloads, rapier is a much better overall weapon.

 

Or, for that matter, if you DON'T have turmoil/overloads/are maxed, because it will help you get those things faster because it is better at frost dragons.

[Assume Nothing]

Yep, rapier sucks for what I need chaotic for.

Therefore CLS > Rapier is subjective to you.

 

No, it's not subjective. It's been proven that it's better.

Proven where

 

Most monsters have so little defence that the Strength bonus doesn't matter. If speed doesn't matter, why not use a Chaotic Maul

The last 50 pages. Slightly better then Rapier MHing, which is what I need it for. Don't even bother trying to make me regret it.

How is it not subjective when you ignore most of the game? CLS might be better for you, but saying it's a better weapon is just showing how stupid you are. This thread clearly proves that if you are maxed/have turmoil/overloads, rapier is a much better overall weapon.

 

Or, for that matter, if you DON'T have turmoil/overloads/are maxed, because it will help you get those things faster because it is better at frost dragons.

This thread is strictly for the Elite. And over time, when you DO get the levels, it will become inferior.

[gremmy]

Yep, rapier sucks for what I need chaotic for.

Therefore CLS > Rapier is subjective to you.

 

No, it's not subjective. It's been proven that it's better.

Proven where

 

Most monsters have so little defence that the Strength bonus doesn't matter. If speed doesn't matter, why not use a Chaotic Maul

The last 50 pages. Slightly better then Rapier MHing, which is what I need it for. Don't even bother trying to make me regret it.

How is it not subjective when you ignore most of the game? CLS might be better for you, but saying it's a better weapon is just showing how stupid you are. This thread clearly proves that if you are maxed/have turmoil/overloads, rapier is a much better overall weapon.

 

Exactly. I don't need an overall weapon, so please don't call me stupid, arrogant [bleep].