the way he worded it made it seem like he got it first to me. If it's his second weapon, then yea that makes perfect sense, because now he's got the best of both ends for melee weapons.

 

of course i have rapier lol, for slayer (points at 8m+ dung xp)

 

the point of that explaination was not to show that you should get maul first, but to show that maul is worth getting at some point

 

300k tokens atm, hoenstly have no idea what to spend tokens on so im saving till batch 2(maul and rapier makes ls useless), maybe ill be lucky and theylll have some item that costs 1m tokens thats pretty decent (doesnt have to be a weapon, can be something usefull in general), id pay 1m tokens to acess the gatestone spell outside of dung =]

 

the point of that explaination was not to show that you should get maul first, but to show that maul is worth getting at some point

 

 

That's been said multiple times throughout this thread :unsure:

Wasn't maul good for dark beasts or something? I may be wrong but I think I saw it being used there.

Wasn't maul good for dark beasts or something? I may be wrong but I think I saw it being used there.

 

Dark beasts have average defence and rapier + turmoil/piety + extremes hits extremely accurately on them (even whip is very effective against them).

I just wish the rapier looked nicer. :sad: But anyway, idk what I'm gonna get yet. I don't plan on stopping training dungeon after I get 80. But, I was doing f34 5:5 large tonight, and I got a Shadow Silk Hood! At level 71 dungeon, on what is probably like the 10th spider I have seen. So idk how lucky that is, but I think it is pretty lucky, considering I got it, out of the 4 ppl on the pile trying to. Now I kind of feel like I have to continue training dungeon, just cause I have the hood, so might as well use it. w/e, I'm happy.

 

expect a picture in 2 weeks or so with whatever weapon I decide to get.

maul own kq and wf

 

long bandos, tds

 

crossbow armadyl

 

rapier all the others lol :))

 

got a maul and pwned kq lol

Im in like page 20, but i think you still think that Chaotic Maul>C. Rapier in tds.

 

This is not true as:

 

1) C. Rapier may hit 290 and 270, so u get 2 hits and not 1 in very little time. Besides, the maul will fail in some point (i mean in hit)

2)TDs are weak to stab, check this link if not: http://runescape.wikia.com/wiki/Tormented_demon under pic in "weakness"

 

 

3) In the matter of CR vs CLS, IMO is like comparing D long and D scimy, i might be wrong, but i trully think so.

No evidence that they are weak to stab.

I don't get it...

 

This is a 51 Page debate about weapons that can ALL be bought... Why not get what you prefer first, for instance a Rapier, then get the LS/M/S/CB whatever, after? 2M EXP isn't hard to get at around LVL80-85.

 

Isn't this entire thread down to personal preference? :unsure:

I don't get it...

 

This is a 51 Page debate about weapons that can ALL be bought... Why not get what you prefer first, for instance a Rapier, then get the LS/M/S/CB whatever, after? 2M EXP isn't hard to get at around LVL80-85.

 

Isn't this entire thread down to personal preference? :unsure:

No, this thread is about which weapons are best where. :wall:

No evidence that they are weak to stab.

 

Yea there is, Wikia is never EVER wrong, cause if it is, another player changes it. And since i did WGS and TDs, they were weak to stab. Wikia is like this thread, players report they personal experiences to what is the weakness of demons, just check this link: http://runescape.wikia.com/wiki/Tormented_demon

I don't get it...

 

This is a 51 Page debate about weapons that can ALL be bought... Why not get what you prefer first, for instance a Rapier, then get the LS/M/S/CB whatever, after? 2M EXP isn't hard to get at around LVL80-85.

 

Isn't this entire thread down to personal preference? :unsure:

No, this thread is about which weapons are best where. :wall:

 

From the OP, it seems that it was comparing the swords against each other. If that changed during the course of the thread, then I'm sorry. Didn't fancy trawling through 51 pages of the same thing.

Yea there is, Wikia is never EVER right, cause if it is, another player changes it.

 

Fixed that for you.

Yea there is, Wikia is never EVER right, cause if it is, another player changes it.

 

Fixed that for you.

 

 

Find 1 mistake and prove it. Then ill say ur right.

How about this Both cls and rapier has thier perks

 

Cls: bosses

Rapier:Slayer, Sgw, Training

 

Cls=underpowered one handed godsword that is a bit faster w/o spec

Rapier=Whip jacked up on steriods that can stab

Maul=Weaker ags spec every hit

Because that is not only almost completely wrong, but its also a totally illogical way of looking at it. CR isn't a "Jacked up version of whip", since they use different attack styles as their main option (stab vs slash)

 

CLS is faster then GS, and will under most circumstances, possibly all, out power and preform it.

 

CR is almost always better then CLS, even for bosses, unless you aren't using defender (And if you aren't soloing or tanking, you should be using a defender, or at least have one with you.)

 

Maul may not max as high as AGS can, but it will still outperform the GS for pure DPS, even including the 2 specs/minute the AGS has. If anything, the maul has more KO potential, as it more consistently hits higher then a GS will.

 

And sir arma, I EDIT the RS wiki, partially because there are SOO many errors.

 

(Remembers when balmung was said to have +133 str...)

 

I also remember not even a week ago when Elysian spirit shield was said to cost 577m in the GE.

How about this Both cls and rapier has thier perks

 

Cls: bosses

Rapier:Slayer, Sgw, Training

 

Cls=underpowered one handed godsword that is a bit faster w/o spec

Rapier=Whip jacked up on steriods that can stab

Maul=Weaker ags spec every hit

Because that is not only almost completely wrong, but its also a totally illogical way of looking at it. CR isn't a "Jacked up version of whip", since they use different attack styles as their main option (stab vs slash)

 

CLS is faster then GS, and will under most circumstances, possibly all, out power and preform it.

 

CR is almost always better then CLS, even for bosses, unless you aren't using defender (And if you aren't soloing or tanking, you should be using a defender, or at least have one with you.)

 

Maul may not max as high as AGS can, but it will still outperform the GS for pure DPS, even including the 2 specs/minute the AGS has. If anything, the maul has more KO potential, as it more consistently hits higher then a GS will.

 

And sir arma, I EDIT the RS wiki, partially because there are SOO many errors.

 

(Remembers when balmung was said to have +133 str...)

 

omg, that must have been the day after release ir a typo, as i said, anyone can change it, so typos are posible. Besides, theres nothing better than wikia, well besides tip.it. U cant compare wikia with zybez or rrunehq. (wikia is way better)

RS Wiki SAYS that TDs are weak to stab, but there is no evidence given. Show me the evidence, mate.

Wiki sites are usually a lot more credible than people give them credit for. Everything should be taken with a grain of salt though, obviously.

RS Wiki SAYS that TDs are weak to stab, but there is no evidence given. Show me the evidence, mate.

 

Show me evidence they arent?

Se let me get this straight, even though there are typos, or incorrect information, and even though you have no PROOF that TDS are weak to stab, you'll believe RS wiki?

 

And arma, burden of proof is on you, not on us. You are the one saying that they are weak. Anyone can make claims, but the person making the claims has the responsibility to prove, or at least give evidence, to back up his claims. We don't have to disprove your claims.

RS Wiki SAYS that TDs are weak to stab, but there is no evidence given. Show me the evidence, mate.

 

Show me evidence they arent?

 

Sorry, but when you claim something to be true, it's your job to prove it. Tormented Demons are weakest to earth spells. Prove me wrong.

Se let me get this straight, even though there are typos, or incorrect information, and even though you have no PROOF that TDS are weak to stab, you'll believe RS wiki?

 

 

Im saying that wikia is never wrong, and when it is, players correct it. Its a "wiki", wikipedia also have typos, but you still know that they will be corrected. For example, Balmung isnt 133 str now, is it?

You, sir, are either delusional, or an idiot. If you are in school, they I'd be very surprised if your teacher allowed you to use any Wiki as a reference or a source. If you'd like to discuss the canon of the RS wiki however, please make a separate topic. This is for CR vs CLS discussion.

 

Saying that ANYTHING is never wrong is just opening yourself up for ridicule.

 

The KB is never wrong, after all. Jagex is the maker of the game RuneScape, they wouldn't make a mistake, or if they did they would correct it right away!

 

I'm not discounting the utility of RS wiki, rather I'm pointing out the idiocy of claiming RS wiki as canon.

I'm not discounting the utility of RS wiki, rather I'm pointing out the idiocy of claiming RS wiki as canon.

 

That was sarcasm....correct?

why is it bad? It is a better source than random internet pages....