Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Tip.It Forum

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Boy cleared of murder from killing an alleged pedophile

Featured Replies

Sounds like self-defense to be honest.

11-1.jpg[

Guild Wars 2-In game screenshot, the MMORPG you are waiting for. Click for thread.

Not really a pedophile if the boy was 17.

Signature3.gif

With so many trees in the city you could see the spring coming each day until a night of warm wind would bring it suddenly in one morning. Sometimes the heavy cold rains would beat it back so that it would seem that it would never come and that you were losing a season out of your life. But you knew that there would always be the spring as you knew the river would flow again after it was frozen. When the cold rains kept on and killed the spring, it was as though a young person had died for no reason. In those days though the spring always came finally but it was frightening that it had nearly failed.

i think no-one has the right to take someone elses life

 

only his own life

2nv5bvl.png
99 Firemaking 30-5-2010 | 99 Fletching 13-7-2014
TET-AU member:6-10-2010 - 21-10-2011

I KNEW IT! MUSLIMS!

 

 

 

As with most cases, with a genuine fear that your life is in danger, and if you have tried to escape and there is obviously no way you can, then usually you will be cleared. And I'm not sure what the age of consent is in UK, but it's 18 over here, which would still make it pedophilia, or at the very most, attempted rape.

I have all the 99s, and have been playing since 2001. Comped 4/30/15 

My Araxxi Kills: 459::Araxxi Drops(KC):

Araxxi Hilts: 4x Eye (14/126/149/459), Web - (100) Fang (193)

Araxxi Legs Completed: 5 ---Top (69/206/234/292/361), Middle (163/176/278/343/395), Bottom (135/256/350/359/397)
Boss Pets: Supreme - 848 KC

If you play Xbox One - Add me! GT: Urtehnoes - Currently on a Destiny binge 

 

I KNEW IT! MUSLIMS!

 

 

 

As with most cases, with a genuine fear that your life is in danger, and if you have tried to escape and there is obviously no way you can, then usually you will be cleared. And I'm not sure what the age of consent is in UK, but it's 18 over here, which would still make it pedophilia, or at the very most, attempted rape.

Statutory rape.

aah.png

aah.png
aah.png

aah.png

 

People in glass houses should shower in the basement.

 

If someone poses a legitimate and present threat to cause you or someone nearby serious harm, you have the right to kill them. Nothing much lost.

LOTRjokesigedition-1.png

Get back here so I can rub your butt.

MUSLIMS AGAIN. LETS INVADE THEIR COUNTRY!

[/bush]

Sounds like self defense to me, he would kill him if he had refused the rape.

2egffxf.png

[hide]

Felix, je moeder.

Je moeder felix

Je vader, felix.

Felix, je oma.

Felix, je ongelofelijk gave pwnaze avatar B)

Felix, je moeder.

[/hide]

UK is 16.

Signature3.gif

With so many trees in the city you could see the spring coming each day until a night of warm wind would bring it suddenly in one morning. Sometimes the heavy cold rains would beat it back so that it would seem that it would never come and that you were losing a season out of your life. But you knew that there would always be the spring as you knew the river would flow again after it was frozen. When the cold rains kept on and killed the spring, it was as though a young person had died for no reason. In those days though the spring always came finally but it was frightening that it had nearly failed.

i think no-one has the right to take someone elses life

 

only his own life

 

If a guys trying to kill me, I think I have the right to take his life, imo. Also, a few crimes deserve death - for an extreme example, how about Hitler or Stalin.

 

Thing that gets me, it doesn't appear as though there is evidence to support the boy's claim. If it's true, I agree with what he did - but I think they need more then hear-say, which from how I understood the article, that's all there is.

Squab unleashes Megiddo! Completed all quests and hard diaries. 75+ Skiller. (At one point.) 2000+ total. 99 Magic.
[spoiler=The rest of my sig. You know you wanna see it.]

my difinition of noob is i dont like u, either u are better then me or u are worst them me

Buying spins make you a bad person...don't do it. It's like buying nukes for North Korea.

Well if it bothers you that the game is more fun now, then you can go cry in a corner. :shame:

your article was the equivalent of a circumcized porcupine

The only thing wrong with it is the lack of a percentage for when you need to stroke it.

 


7ApdH.png
squabharpy.png
Poignant Purple to Lokie's Ravishing Red and Alg's Brilliant Blue.

Natural Selection.

 

Kill off the stupid ones.

 

But this is a case of self defense...

"Let your anger be as a monkey in a piñata... hiding amongst the candy... hoping the kids don't break through with the stick." - Master Tang

i think no-one has the right to take someone elses life

 

only his own life

 

If a guys trying to kill me, I think I have the right to take his life, imo. Also, a few crimes deserve death - for an extreme example, how about Hitler or Stalin.

 

Thing that gets me, it doesn't appear as though there is evidence to support the boy's claim. If it's true, I agree with what he did - but I think they need more then hear-say, which from how I understood the article, that's all there is.

 

Do you really think that the most appropriate punishment for a brutal dictator is death? I'd make them watch their creation fall. They should have done that to Saddam Hussein. After all, Adolf Hitler took his own life, when he saw the 3rd Reich was going to fall, it was an easy and virtually painless way out of the whole situation. If you destroy a person and their ideas in front of them, they will beg for death, as they fear far worse.

 

For the OP, I think self defence is pretty much the only justified situation where one person causes the death of another.

 

EDIT: On reflection, that was probably my darkest post ever.

~ W ~

 

sigzi.png

Death and suffering is a part of our culture, and we all contribute to it. Right and wrong are [cabbage] ideas, and aren't universal anyway.

The way the title was wrote made me think it was a 12 year old boy or something, not a 17 year old who is a year away from legally being an adult.

 

Too much speculation too I think. Of course it's kind of hard to make a judgement call on something that didn't actually happen. You would think he would have been able to just shove away or hit the man or something and run, killing seems pretty unnecessary.

If it was a pedo, good riddance.

J'adore aussi le sexe et les snuff movies

Je trouve que ce sont des purs moments de vie

Je ne me reconnais plus dans les gens

Je suis juste un cas désespérant

Et comme personne ne viendra me réclamer

Je terminerai comme un objet retrouvé

Too much speculation too I think. Of course it's kind of hard to make a judgement call on something that didn't actually happen. You would think he would have been able to just shove away or hit the man or something and run, killing seems pretty unnecessary.

Why was it unnecessary, though? If he ran away the pedohpile would just find him and punish him in some way. Going to the cops would just take too long and too inefficient. The boy had his own evidence, there was no need to bring it to bureaucratic court to be solved.

 

+1 to Joe's post. :thumbup:

"The cry of the poor is not always just, but if you never hear it you'll never know what justice is."

siggy3s.jpg

Molesting a 17 year old sure is pedophilia, especially when the definition applies only to pre-pubescents. :roll:

 

Of course, if it was Justin Beiber that was about to be raped, then sure, it's pedophilia.

SWAG

 

Mayn U wanna be like me but U can't be me cuz U ain't got ma swagga on.

Too much speculation too I think. Of course it's kind of hard to make a judgement call on something that didn't actually happen. You would think he would have been able to just shove away or hit the man or something and run, killing seems pretty unnecessary.

Why was it unnecessary, though? If he ran away the pedohpile would just find him and punish him in some way. Going to the cops would just take too long and too inefficient. The boy had his own evidence, there was no need to bring it to bureaucratic court to be solved.

 

+1 to Joe's post. :thumbup:

 

Because we can't just let people going around doing their own vigilante justice. There is no way to tell if the guy actually wanted to rape him or not and without any evidence you are just relying on the word of some guy.

i think no-one has the right to take someone elses life

 

only his own life

 

If a guys trying to kill me, I think I have the right to take his life, imo. Also, a few crimes deserve death - for an extreme example, how about Hitler or Stalin.

 

Thing that gets me, it doesn't appear as though there is evidence to support the boy's claim. If it's true, I agree with what he did - but I think they need more then hear-say, which from how I understood the article, that's all there is.

i think death is too soft of a punishment for a crime like taking another one's life :thumbdown:

2nv5bvl.png
99 Firemaking 30-5-2010 | 99 Fletching 13-7-2014
TET-AU member:6-10-2010 - 21-10-2011

Sure is confusing "pedophile" with "child molester".

If someone poses a legitimate and present threat to cause you or someone nearby serious harm, you have the right to kill them. Nothing much lost.

 

 

this

Too much speculation too I think. Of course it's kind of hard to make a judgement call on something that didn't actually happen. You would think he would have been able to just shove away or hit the man or something and run, killing seems pretty unnecessary.

Why was it unnecessary, though? If he ran away the pedohpile would just find him and punish him in some way. Going to the cops would just take too long and too inefficient. The boy had his own evidence, there was no need to bring it to bureaucratic court to be solved.

 

+1 to Joe's post. :thumbup:

 

Because we can't just let people going around doing their own vigilante justice. There is no way to tell if the guy actually wanted to rape him or not and without any evidence you are just relying on the word of some guy.

Yea well, if you feel that you are in danger you have the right to use self-defense. Whether the justice system feels what you do is right or wrong is another story. Self-survival is more important than the survival of someone trying to hurt you. But I see what you mean, we don't know if what the defendant said is true.

99 Hunter - November 1st, 2008

99 Cooking -July 22nd, 2009

99 Firemaking - July 29th, 2010

99 Fletching - December 30th, 2010

Too much speculation too I think. Of course it's kind of hard to make a judgement call on something that didn't actually happen. You would think he would have been able to just shove away or hit the man or something and run, killing seems pretty unnecessary.

Why was it unnecessary, though? If he ran away the pedohpile would just find him and punish him in some way. Going to the cops would just take too long and too inefficient. The boy had his own evidence, there was no need to bring it to bureaucratic court to be solved.

 

+1 to Joe's post. :thumbup:

 

Because we can't just let people going around doing their own vigilante justice. There is no way to tell if the guy actually wanted to rape him or not and without any evidence you are just relying on the word of some guy.

Yea well, if you feel that you are in danger you have the right to use self-defense. Whether the justice system feels what you did is right or wrong is another story. Self-survival is more important than the survival of someone trying to hurt you. But I see what you mean, we don't know if what the defendant said is true.

 

yeah that's my entire point.

 

Self defense, in reason, is perfectly acceptable. If you are afraid for your own life and the only way out is to kill them, do it.

 

However There is nothing (at least that the article states) that made me think this man could have killed the kid. If it was a 12 year old, sure, but a 17 year old? I think he could handle himself without having to kill someone.

Too much speculation too I think. Of course it's kind of hard to make a judgement call on something that didn't actually happen. You would think he would have been able to just shove away or hit the man or something and run, killing seems pretty unnecessary.

Why was it unnecessary, though? If he ran away the pedohpile would just find him and punish him in some way. Going to the cops would just take too long and too inefficient. The boy had his own evidence, there was no need to bring it to bureaucratic court to be solved.

 

+1 to Joe's post. :thumbup:

 

Because we can't just let people going around doing their own vigilante justice. There is no way to tell if the guy actually wanted to rape him or not and without any evidence you are just relying on the word of some guy.

Yea well, if you feel that you are in danger you have the right to use self-defense. Whether the justice system feels what you did is right or wrong is another story. Self-survival is more important than the survival of someone trying to hurt you. But I see what you mean, we don't know if what the defendant said is true.

 

yeah that's my entire point.

 

Self defense, in reason, is perfectly acceptable. If you are afraid for your own life and the only way out is to kill them, do it.

 

However There is nothing (at least that the article states) that made me think this man could have killed the kid. If it was a 12 year old, sure, but a 17 year old? I think he could handle himself without having to kill someone.

Maybe, but its hard to think rationally when you feel like you are in danger.

99 Hunter - November 1st, 2008

99 Cooking -July 22nd, 2009

99 Firemaking - July 29th, 2010

99 Fletching - December 30th, 2010

The guy went there armed "in case something happened" and admitted to that fact in an interview. IMO that's premeditation.

He should have been done for manslaughter at the very least based on the claim he wasn't going to use it unless something happened.

I'd see it as self defence if he had knifed the victim with something from the victims home. Not something he brought in with him.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.