NoMoreDead Posted June 5, 2007 Share Posted June 5, 2007 Recently, I saw a couple of lvl 126's whom I suspected of auto-fishing. I did not report them, since many 126's refuse to talk or do anything but focus on what they are doing, and I have no problem with that. But, here is my posed question to everyone...If a combat level 126 is autoing, should they be banned instantly, or given a second chance? My stance: Although the player has prooven him/her self as a good and fair player of the game (assuming he didn't auto kill anything), the penalties should be stiff. I vote that the player should be banned. Do they diserve a second chance? Does the mass amounts of legit time they spent outweigh the hours they didn't? You decide. I'd be interested to see if anybody will take the "Dont ban" side. It would make for a fun debate \ Votes: Ban: 61 Don't Ban: 6 Ban, Unless its Chuck Norris: 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anonymous1234 Posted June 5, 2007 Share Posted June 5, 2007 it doesn't matter if they are the best player in rs. if you are macroing you are banned permanently, no tolerance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harrington Posted June 5, 2007 Share Posted June 5, 2007 If they genuinely are actually using autoers, then yes they should be banned. Although I think you'll find they've simply got public chat off, as I often do myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoMoreDead Posted June 5, 2007 Author Share Posted June 5, 2007 oh and to a mod...could someone bump this into a autoers-macroers page please?? Sorry about that :oops: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Devoted12- Posted June 5, 2007 Share Posted June 5, 2007 Shouldn't this acutally go into the Debate Club forum. It's not really a rant it's a debate... If it is to go in the Debate Club forum, here's the link... http://forum.tip.it/viewforum.php?f=143 Also, I think that they should be banned straight out. The amount of time a person puts into a character makes no difference. That's like saying two people both murdered someone. One person has no job, kids, or family. The other man has everything he could ask for and EARNED it all. Should we be nicer to the rich man because he worked hard to get to where he was and we wouldn't want to ruin it? The same punishment goes for EVERYONE in my opinion. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoMoreDead Posted June 5, 2007 Author Share Posted June 5, 2007 lol thanks! someone bump me into the correct forum please. Thanks much in advance! :thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stingkid Posted June 5, 2007 Share Posted June 5, 2007 Yes. They should be. Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish, your commodity drops in value. [url=http://www.imagehosting.com][img]http://www.imagehosting.com/out.php/i773526_stingtag.gif[/img][/url] [quote name="Capone_Sabre"]People in the wilderness will [b]always[/b] insult you no matter what you do. Just ignore it and kill them.[/quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
azntemplar_00 Posted June 5, 2007 Share Posted June 5, 2007 Moved to Debate Club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kewl_Sabre Posted June 5, 2007 Share Posted June 5, 2007 Of course they should be banned. No one is above the rules - if anything, high level players should be banned even faster than lower level players. It'll sting a lot more to lose a 126 than a 50. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deathly_god5 Posted June 5, 2007 Share Posted June 5, 2007 They should be banned. Because like someone mentioned before just because their a lvl 126 and may have worked their way there and just decided to finally use a macro or something doesn't give them the right. And again they should definitely be banned. A Clan or Guild leader and looking for allies please join our Trade Federation here at our forums. Looking for a skilling clan/guild join ourshere.Or you can look at our topic here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spooferfish Posted June 6, 2007 Share Posted June 6, 2007 it doesn't matter if they are the best player in rs. if you are macroing you are banned permanently, no tolerance Exactly. If you think they are autoing, report them. Then if they are, ban, if they aren't nothing happens and no one knows the better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Latinoking Posted June 6, 2007 Share Posted June 6, 2007 No one is above the rules so yes they should be banned! I am Teh_King[My dA][My Last.FM][My Twitter] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justcallmedaddy Posted June 6, 2007 Share Posted June 6, 2007 I doubt someone would put a 126 account in jepordy of being banned...but rules are rules, so ban their sorry (wagon)! That is if they were autoing of course, which I highly doubt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highlanders Posted June 6, 2007 Share Posted June 6, 2007 Do they diserve a second chance? If they are caught, no. I can't imagine Jagex going "You are level 126, we give you another chance." Doesn't make sense. Does the mass amounts of legit time they spent outweigh the hours they didn't? In the rules, it doesn't make any difference, they will be banned anyway. I see nothing wrong with it :lol: Some people spend hours playing this game "by the rules", still they can act like jerks, calling people names, being a general annoyance. A level 126, doing something reckless with his account then getting banned for it, I think that's a nice poetic Runescape ending, and onto something else in life. "He should get banned, he broke the rules!" as if we talked about someone commiting manslaughter. I agree, we should be fair to all players. But does anyone even cares if people like that get banned or not? It's an additonal fun for some, a challenge, and darn the consequences. The worse thing that happens is a virtual death, wow :) 2480+ total Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoMoreDead Posted June 6, 2007 Author Share Posted June 6, 2007 Anyone want to try to make a "dont ban" argument? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJE03 Posted June 6, 2007 Share Posted June 6, 2007 Well that wouldn't be very fair if they got away with it while others did not, so I say permanent ban should be given to them just as it would be any autoer. [spoiler=Stats:]Updated December 22, 2011: Total level - 1442 - 170M+ XP , Combat level - 115Combat skills: Attack - 90, Defence - 99 (24.45m+ XP), Strength - 90, Constitution - 99 (16.42M+ XP) Ranged - 99 (13.32M+ XP), Prayer - 60, Magic - 99 (13.25M+ XP)Non-Combat skills: Cooking - 99 (13.80M+ XP), Woodcutting - 99 (31.95M+ XP), Fishing - 90, Firemaking - 99 (24.82M+), Crafting - 90, Smithing - 90, Mining - 85, Runecrafting - 60, Dungeoneering - 85 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unkn0wnwarrior Posted June 6, 2007 Share Posted June 6, 2007 I don't think anybody but a level 126 autoer would say they should get a second chance... And as I am not a level 126 autoer, ban 'em. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazzy Posted June 6, 2007 Share Posted June 6, 2007 It's cruel that a 126 would even WANT to try to auto, they've proberly been playing it for 2-3 years or so, and lvl50s up can't play th game properly. BANNETH TEH AUTO NOOBS! yes, they're noobs beacause they auto, true fact, or they wouldn't auto.BOOM. Are you sick and tired of people telling you what to put in your sig? So am I. No, don't put this in your sig, you'll be doing what THEY want! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
introuble3 Posted June 6, 2007 Share Posted June 6, 2007 ban its a shame but no excuses!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xhhcx Posted June 6, 2007 Share Posted June 6, 2007 ... what makes you think that a l 126 have played longer or worked gharder than a L3 or 43? stil only combat levels who happens to be the easiest things to train up :) BAN! ofcourse. but as you said, he probably dident auto... in fact there is no real way of teling if someone is. he probably just had the public off and were powere fishing and therefore was following a rutine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freesia Posted June 6, 2007 Share Posted June 6, 2007 I simply don't understand why a lvl 126 would even want to macro at all and I really hate people that simply assumed x to be macroer simply because of "x does not talk" situations. Even if they are pc products they have at least worked hard to achieve that lvl 126 combat status. Anyway I don't think Jagex should practice discrimination at all.. ever. Strangely with WotLK so near, I wished I could delay it a bit to push through that last TBC content in MH/BT :'(. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highlanders Posted June 6, 2007 Share Posted June 6, 2007 I agree with Freesia, I doubt anyone would be stupid enough to macro on their main character. People assume the person macros becaue she/he doesn't talk, that's plain stupid. The only way macros do money is by logging in multiple macros at the same time(10+), then making them work at the same time. Macroing, any other way, is useless and stupid, especially on a main character. 2480+ total Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Needrunefreak Posted June 6, 2007 Share Posted June 6, 2007 Jagex would still not ban them because they would think that it's a noob who got insulted by him and decided to report him. Unless everyone there reported him, in which case they think he shouted "Hey everybody report x for macroing!", where you replace X with the player's name. But I think that they should get banned because they're still breaking the rules. Click on Website to join my clan, Impures Unite.Shouldn't there be more dwarf truck stops? Click to support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alg Posted June 7, 2007 Share Posted June 7, 2007 they should be banned, no matter who they are. there is no excuse for cheating multiplayer. aside from that, i'll contribute to the against argument. -they spend a lot of time ingame, and it was a small lapse of judgement. -they are loyal to jagex for staying that long ingame that's all i can think of I painted some stuff and put it on tumblr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFonseka Posted June 7, 2007 Share Posted June 7, 2007 ... what makes you think that a l 126 have played longer or worked gharder than a L3 or 43? stil only combat levels who happens to be the easiest things to train up :) BAN! ofcourse. but as you said, he probably dident auto... in fact there is no real way of teling if someone is. he probably just had the public off and were powere fishing and therefore was following a rutine. Using a bit of common sense and a bit of game experience, one can deduce that a level 126 worked harder than a level 3 or level 43, assuming no one was autoing, dimwit. 2432nd to 99 mining Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now