Bufoman

You got the two switched, Republic is the first one, Democracy is the second.

Did you check if your school had an opening as an assistant to the local tech? Might conflict with your schedule, buy maybe their is something you could do after school or a few hours before to earn a little extra cash. Depends on the school I suppose, mine already had two techs so their was no openings as I understood it.

Their is freedom of speech and of the press. The two both cover words- written and spoken, they do not cover acts of subversion such as burning a nations flag. The right to peacefully assemble is also covered in the first amendment, their is nothing peaceful about burning a flag as an act of subversion or protest. Protest, that's also covered in the first amendment and it is here that flag burning managed to squeeze into it. Here is a short explanation of the issue, and why it is legal in this country: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_amen ... ag_burning I don't like it, and believe it should not be covered under the right to protest, or any other right. The only time a flag should be burned is to properly dispose of it after it has become worn or soiled. A flag is the symbol of a nation, a banner under which armies have marched, and for which soldiers have died. To burn, spit upon, or otherwise desecrate it is to make an attack upon all those who have made sacrifices for it. Please do not tell me about how outlawing this would hurt the first amendment, for it has already been violated with outrageous things such as Hate Crime Legislation. We don't have freedom of speech in this country, only of acceptable speech. We don't have freedom of expression either, only if it's acceptable (putting a cross in cow crap and calling it art is acceptable, while putting a noose in a co-workers locker as a practical joke is not), or if youre a minority (if your black you can say the dreaded N word, if your white you will find yourself facing a Judge).

A: I pretend to be dead for a short while, about ten seconds, then jump up and give every one a terrible fright :twisted: B: Because you are showing it off (for me to stare a woman really has to outdo herself with tight, or more likely almost non-existent clothing. C: shout an obscenity at them that ends with Off! D: probably start whatever I am going to say with a throat noise similar to Ahem. Here is a case E for you: Find yourself being bullied by some scum that has you outnumbered. Answer: Evaluate the situation first, determine what assets I have in the area (potential weapons, friends) then decide whether to put the scum in their place. Yes that is quite a militant answer to the question, and I can see why you did not ask things like that... quite different from the others which involve no risk of physical harm.

Well since every one is seems to be intent on debating the subject I thought I would post the link to an article on Wikipedia about the subject of National missile defense: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missile_shield Their is a constant struggle between the sword and the shield. The sword always wins in the end, or so I am told. In other words the Russians, Chinese, North Koreans, and any other hostile nation with nuclear capabilities will if they want to badly enough (and have the required resources) find way's to overcome our defenses. Our best defense is and always has been MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction).

No I don't think they are doing a very good job. Clan Chat is not what it should be, nor is the wilderness. They failed to replace what was lost when they changed it from PVP to PVM (Player Vs Player to Player Vs Monster). Allot of clan's suffered from this change including Militos Deci. Bounty hunter is not a suitable substitute and is not favorable to clan in general due to the combat restrictions placed upon them. Clan Wars was not that good when I retired, don't know if they did anything to improve them. I think Jagex really needs to have it's staff join some of the more popular clan's out their on their regular accounts (not the one's with golden crown's) and actually become full fledged members. Perhaps if they do so they will have a better understanding of what the clan world is like, and what it was before the January updates. Jagex's main priority for clan support should be to bring back the old wilderness; all they need to do is make some small changes and restrictions. Perhaps having it start in level 20 right off would be a big improvement. As for Bots: Jagex needs to lighten up a bit, if a few get through from time to time it's not that big a deal. While we are on the subject of bots and all the obtrusive changes that where made to stop them, I need to ask this: How many of you would be willing to have the bots back if it would bring back the old game instead of this completely different one?

Well like it or not we are taking action over their to prevent the Russians from simply taking over. We are taking control of the air and sea ports for example. I am surprised we haven't reinforced the capital by now to prevent it from being knocked over too easily... not all us Americans are saber rattling at the moment. I was surprised to hear Dr. Savage (one of the, if not the leading independent conservative talk show host) say that we have no business interfering in what he considers a Russian affair. I thought he of all people would be calling us to arms. The Georgian president has made many claims and accusations about Russian persecution of his people in country. These claims include that they are murdering civilians, and putting them in concentration camps: http://www.nypost.com/seven/08142008/ne ... 124392.htm If this proves to be true- to the full extent of these allegations I for one wouldnt mind at this time annihilating the Russian forces their. Of course I am sure I would regret that decision some time down the line.

Well during the cold war it never went nuclear... came close with the Cuban missile crisis. I for one can see a potential for a military confrontation in Georgia, even a full scale conventional war if both sides are crazy enough to take it to that level. However even the Soviets where not crazy enough to step up the cold war with nukes. Worse case scenario: we start world war three with nukes kept in reserve, and ends in a stale mate some years later after millions die on both sides- most likely neither side will be permitted to attack the mainland of the other, or else nukes would be deployed. Still I think it more likely this will be resolved by either diplomatic means, or with a military standoff between our forces and the Russians. The former is preferable of course.

I know this is a little late... but one month has not quite expired yet. I haven't put it in yet, did not really notice. I retired from my position as leader of the order a month or so back, so now that I think about it that's the reason I don't fill it in. Although I have retired I stayed on as the Root-Admin, and am sort of a member in that capacity... But I don't play Runescape any more, so I am not exactly a part of the Runescape clan known as Militos Deci. I am more of a member of the forum community their...

More to the point this helps stop the bombings, as they would be bombing "our" air and sea ports.

Well guy's here is some more news: http://home.peoplepc.com/psp/newsstory. ... 2112830113 If this thing turns into a shooting war one can only hope the two powers involved here have a strong enough sense of self preservation to keep it confined in the conflict zone, similar to Korea. While it is true that our forces are superior in most ways to the Russians one must consider the vulnerable supply lines involved here. Going it alone might not be the best idea, but I am confident we will not overextend ourselves, as any military assets we send there are simply too valuable. I believe an F-22 costs around 90 million dollars for example. Then again I do not have the greatest confidence that our government always acts in the nations best interest but rather in the interests of the elite. In which case the goal here is to justify a serious increase in military spending, and thus the revenue of the Arms Industry. Edit: for that matter we should consider the Russian arms industry and what they have to gain... might not be much though if military spending is already very high over their.

I certainly hope the government has the good sense to keep this technology a state secret for many years to come, at least until we know what it's applications could be. Might turn out to be a gimmick that has no practical uses- can only get it to work in a controlled environment. Still better safe than sorry, I would rather not wake up one day to hear the Red Chinese fleet is off our coast.

Well we might be getting into it with Russia if they keep up the invasion of Georgia. In which case I expect our air forces to be among the first to engage them in hostilities due to their rapid ability to be deployed around the world (just hop from one airbase to the other). Their are plenty of pretenses for engaging the Russian military in Georgia without setting off a shooting war elsewheres. During the Korean War the Chinese sent over 900,000 "volunteers" to turn the tide in the norths favor. Back then we where also taking on Russian migs flown buy Russian pilots. We are long overdue to return that favor.

Looks like the cease fire was short lived: http://home.peoplepc.com/psp/newsstory. ... 1181337897

I wouldnt go as far as to say that we (the US) could not take on the Russians in Georgia. We have ACR's (Armored Cavalry Regiments) that can be quickly deployed and take on entire Russian armored divisions on their own (if only for a limited time). We also have nine aircraft carriers (last time I checked) and I wouldnt be surprised if a task force is on it's way at the time of this writing. But getting involved here may have far reaching consequences, not the least being a hostile Russia. Then again they are not exactly our friends anyways, considering how they intervened for Iran. Why can't we do the same for Georgia? Also no one here has mentioned the obvious: that Moscow may be testing the water, seeing what they can get away with.

Your Type is ISTJ Introverted Sensing Thinking Judging Strength of the preferences % 44 62 25 1 You are: Moderately expressed introvert Distinctively expressed sensing personality Moderately expressed thinking personality Slightly expressed judging personality Okay... I think it believes I am some sort of an idiot... Just because I don't "easily" grasp something doesnt mean I don't with a little effort. I should also point out that they want money for the other tests... On the plus side they did put me in with Harry Truman and Queen Elisabeth the Second. Also I read the thing and it sort of figured me out... say's I am a "Inspector Guardian". I am not that Anti Social though, I can tolerate people, I just don't enjoy the company of strangers who won't give me the time of day.

Thank you very much, it works :thumbsup:

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2006 ... -van_x.htm Yeah, 'cause it's not like the United States executes [developmentally delayed] people, or holds people indefinitely in overseas prisons without bringing them up on charges.... or executes foreigners without giving them access to their consulate.. Yes the Chinese sure do love their death vans... I almost thought for a moment their you where agreeing with Ginger and put up an article about us doing something. On another note Georgia has pulled out of South Osseta and is asking for that cease fire again. The Russians claim they have to verify that Georgia has indeed pulled out: http://home.peoplepc.com/psp/newsstory. ... 0300090174 Any one want to wager that Russia will continue its bombings in the mean time?

I do believe the picture has been stretched (too high). Please keep in mind that the sample provided is not of even height and width, so you will have to compensate in order to avoid distortion.

Well need we go down the list of human rights violations of the Russian Federation, and the former USSR? If you disagree with the government over their you end up in a gulag, or worse. That and it would not exactly be good for my country (the United States of America) to have an old adversary restored to its former glory.

This is indeed lousy news. I do not know which side is to blame here... probably both, but if the reports of Russian aggression into Georgian territory and the bombing of their cities is true, then it is the Russians who have crossed the line here and started a full scale war. I read one article that said Georgian websites are down due to cyber attack; sure enough I can't get them up. I think we need to consider sending the marine expeditionary force to Georgia to get the intelligence we need about exactly what is happening their, and keep the Russians from overrunning the country. Naturally we should not take any aggressive action against the Russians until we have the full picture... something like Desert Shield. Of course that's up to our leaders, but we really shouldnt let the Russians get away with taking Georgia out- not if we have interests over their. The Georgian military is to say the least dwarfed by the Russians. I heard Georgias president offered a cease fire yesterday I believe, but Russia is saying they never got it. The Russians do have a track record as masters of propaganda, one might say they can start a war and make it look like the other country's fault.

Hello. If any one could please make a copy of this avatar That conforms to the TIF regulations without making it seem dull it would be much appreciated. Naturally I want it hosted somewhere and the link provided for my use.

Thanks Mini Me for standing up for some of us who have been called Idiots and Liars by this guy. Mage Killer you never apologized for that, and I am inclined to hold a grudge if you do not. Putting that asides for now, let us continue our argument in a civil manor. First off I said I consider myself a reformist, but not one with a political affiliation. I am not a socialist, or a Marxist, and I do not know what they have to do with being a Reformist. I want reform in this country, does that not by definition make me a reformist? To me it's the same as being a conservative, if your here in America it's supposed to mean Right-Wing, Anti Abortion, Anti Tax and Big Government, Pro 2ND amendment and all that. But if you live in the Ex-Soviet union (well some of the breakaway countries at least) it means you are a communist. Conservatism is defending the status quo as I understand it. I do not like the status quo, that's why I chose the term Reformist. About taxing the rich: did you know that one percent of the population pay's something like 20% of the taxes in this country? Seems that any one who is successful gets punished for it with high taxes. Personally I am in favor of a flat income tax that gradually reduces to nothing the lower you are from the poverty level (or something similar). I am opposed to the Estate and Inheritance tax, as well as property tax (why pay for something you don't make any money from?). Sales tax is tolerable, but I think it's double taxation since you already have to pay Income Tax. It would be really nice if they figured out a way to eliminate all federal taxes... I wonder if our great silver deposits to the south could be nationalized and produce Silver Dollars? As for Health Care: Do you know how extraordinarily expensive it has become? The profit that is being made by this industry is excessive to say the least. If we did have universal health care, it would have to involve opening up government owned and run clinics and hospitals that do not have a profit motive. Doing what Canada did and outlawing healthcare for profit is a bad idea, as it puts the burden on the government and the taxpayers. People have to wait for months up their. Their is hope however, if the insurance company's and the government did not pay the bills so much, then it is very likely the industry would have to substantially lower the cost of providing health care to the masses- to a cost we could afford. It's already happening, did you see the 20-20 report on $25 doctor visits at the malls? I must be off now; we shall continue our discussion later.

I guess I would take the United States... Ohh you mean like super hero power :D All right, I think I would take voluntary Immortality- where I could be immortal, but only so long as I choose to be (no curse involved here).

Okay first off I would like to make it clear that when I said "Damaged Goods" I am referring to the psychological trauma that must have occurred during McCains years of torture at the hands of the vietnese. I am not trying to put him down or anything like that, as a matter of fact I respect him for not cracking (or at least we think he never cracked). But if you watched the Manchurian Candidate you would be a little worried about having him as president. Now putting that aside let me Rebuff you on a few things Mage killer. First off I dislike this statement you had: What exactly do neo-cons have to do with true conservatives? Not that I consider myself a conservative exactly... I am more of a reformist. At any rate you obviously lost the spirit of my statement about "Bush has done anything but make a smaller government with lower taxes." How about addressing the part about smaller government before you call me an Idiot and a Liar? I would like that list of memorable things Obama has done before running for president- just give me the big 3 if you care to post it here. I could argue about that one with you. Theirs allot of Anti Gun sorts in the democrat party, Al Gore for instance. Asides from the fact that everyone hates them? Where does the money go exactly? Allot of it goes to corporate welfare... what was it $160 Billion for the rich? First off My dad does not call up a friend to get me a "cake job", and why exactly do you assume that I am white? or was this just a scenario? I believe in liberty, the right of the people to chose, be their choice good or be it bad. Forcing others to accept some one only leads to resentment, and when you throw in a quota can keep qualified people out because you do not have enough minorities. Before you yell at me about calling minority's ignorant consider that not all area's have many of them, so if you need one black for every ten whites in an area where whites outnumber blacks 1000 to one, you may very well have a hard time finding enough blacks (or others) who are qualified. Imagine the outrage blacks would feel if they where told by a employer "sorry, but we simply do not have enough whites"- if the system was truly fair then that could very well happen in area's where the 1000 to one (all right, maybe not 1000) is black to white. You would love to have the fairness doctern would you? How would you like to have Dr. Savage, Rush Limbaugh, Dr. Laura, and others come on every liberal talk show in the country once a week to force their point of view upon the audience? I doubt very much you would, nor would I like to have Howard Stern or any of the others forced on me- I like to chose who I listen too thank you very much. Both parties are guilty of neglecting the GI's needs, but the democrats have a bad track record. Does any one remember the low funding during the Clinton years? Or how about how the mayor of New Orleans deemed it more important to spend money on public parks than levy maintaince? I would say that the levies can be compared to the armed forces in this regard. When I said freedom of speech I was referring to among other things the "Fairness Doctern"... and does any one remember how recently Nancy Pelosi turned off the lights on the republicans? I resent you trying to put me in a group, I am not a Ron paulite, or a Neo Con, nor do I campaign for any one. Why don't you share with us your political athileations, and what you have done in politics instead of making comments like this