AlexDT

It does, which is why Armoured Zombies are very fast exp. I'd say go with them OP, the drops are great and there's an alter a few steps away, so you can also keep piety on.

If the rewards were more common they'd be cheaper, and you'd end up with the same profit :\

I think you can hit over 100 on the highest level shade, while potted, wearing a salve amulet (e), in full dharok and under a few other ridiculous circumstances. But this is much more awesome, 10/10 :shock:

Kill a rowdy slave. (What an odd sentence)

I did not know this! Thanks for saving me hours in un-noting time :

Reminds me of the whole Dani California/Last Dance with Mary Jane thing. I think we'd be naive to assume that no musician ever draws from another, and yes, perhaps it could even be a coincidence. There are quite a lot of songs, surely two are going to sound vastly similar after a while? But that also seems rather naive. It could only really have been two things: 1. Plagiarism, or 2. Chris (or another band member) heard the song before, it got stuck in his mind in the way that songs often do, and was dragged back up a few years later as a seemingly original melody. I mean, it is possible that this is an honest mistake. Like, say, deja vu. Our minds are very odd things. With all this said, Joe's guitar work there is just plain offensive to listen to. The synth-ey orchestral sound is a far better way to approach that melody. :-#

I agree; if the drops are predictable it would contradict the reason the system was implemented in the first place. Still, I've never actually set foot in a pvp world - defence is a terrible pking stat :lol:

I'm not really sure where else this thread could go :| I will tell you where this thread could go.... it could go where I intended it to go! On a discussion on the documentary! Like do you think it is right that people are losing jobs for MENTIONING I.D.??? PLEASE do not argue evidence against creationism/evolutionism extensively! Mentioning creationism? Probably not. Teaching it in schools as a viable alternative to evolution? Certainly. The problem is this: To be able to justify what I just said, I needed to point out why evolution is more credible than creationism.

You do indeed. 10/10

Dragonhide, Karil's armour, Void armour, mage armour. Really anything that isn't metal.

With the Stranger Plant, you could probably get to 70 at level 66 farming, assuming Jagex rounds the boost up, not down.

It'll be difficult to find a team without about 85+ ranged and 90+ defence. Most groups require 120+ combat for armadyl, just looking at the forums :?

In full void melee with all the trimming (firecape, d boots, etc) and 93 defence, I barely needed to heal at all. Perhaps once each half-hour. I think I'm in love

viewtopic.php?t=565504 (Heh, a couple seconds late)

Jad is easy. The 62 waves are the hard part. If you really know what you're doing and can manage without any mistakes, you should be able to make it. But I wouldn't be surprised if you ran out of super restores the first time round, when you're working out the safespotting, stacking, etc. Good luck :D

I'm not really sure where else this thread could go :|

It is about 1/25000. :thumbsup:

I'm a singer. I'm almost always aware that I'm breathing.

It's not an album I'd put on shuffle. Half the songs are great, half are just awful. But I really, really, really, really like the prechorus in Spaceman :-#

I wrote a very long response to this thread, but decided instead to go for eloquence. So: Both creationism and evolution are testable ideas. Evolution has been tested, questioned, poked and prodded. So far, it's stood up to all its challenges - except the challenges that make no sense, like "evolution cannot be true, because the Bible says that creationism is true, and the Bible is right because God says in the Bible that the Bible is true". :wall: Creationism, on the other hand, has not. No evidence has been put forth to support Creationism apart from the Bible. The earth is not 6,000 years old. In fact the Earth didn't exist for about 10 billion years. I won't get into the Creationism vs. Evolution argument, of course, but the point is that Creationism is demonstrably false. This is why it should not be taught in science class. It can be taught in R.E, for sure, but not in science. I think, OP, that you mistake Richard Dawkins' statement that ID is possible. It is entirely possible that the Earth was seeded by aliens. Indeed, it is a statistical certainty that life exists on other planets. Problem is, these beings could only have come into existence through the process of evolution. The only way a creator being could have designed the universe is this: In an infinitely short time after the Big Bang occurred, elementary particles (which were not yet technically in existence) all jumped into the correct place, forming God. God then designed everything, grabbed it, and teleported 14.5 billion years into the future to plant the universe again so that it seemed to be 14.5 billion years old. The likelihood of the particles jumping is already almost infinitely unlikely, as is the idea that the electrical impulses in God's brain were already positioned in a way that gave him the knowledge and need to create a universe. So is the problem of moving the entire universe into the future. I say almost infinitely because everyone knows that if something is infinitely unlikely to happen, it almost certainly will (Douglas Adams fans will get the reference :D). Basically, a creator being must be at least as complex as its creation, and this begs the question of where god came from, thus complicating the problem. Occam's Razor, and all that. :lol: I do not wish to explain why Hitler's eugenics plan has nothing to do with evolution or why natural selection does not discourage morality. I will if you want me to, but I find the idea of giving such claims credit distasteful. Yes, that was the condensed version. I should really be training defence...

Mine took about 1.5 hours :?

While I hate to say it, sailing does seem like a possibility. You could fish off the side of your boat, trawl for treasure or go diving and make that Brine Sabre special useful (honestly, why does that weapon even exist?). It'd also be nice to keep the ocean's map blank, and have to chart it yourself. Create a little wanderlust, Jagex - people in the Middle Ages couldn't just pull out a complete map every time they heard of a new area of the Earth. All this said, however, I really don't want to see it happen. I can think of nothing worse than having to sail around in a WindWaker-esque fashion, encountering random enemies and generic islands.

+1;

I play with public chat turned off, so I don't really know. Someone call me a noob so I can see how it feels. :

Whoa, very nicely done. 9/10. Oh, and I have skiller friend who gained a strength level catching imps in Puro Puro - don't do that either :?