Iamdan

Ah, this thread got me real worried for a minute..

02 carolla hatch, 9k.

I like greenday's cover of working class hero. sue me

A quick chat type system, with translations. So if somebody says something in quick chat in english, the german equivalent will show up on the screen for somebody in germany. That and emotes, which are generally universal. If speech to text and automatic translators are ever perfected then those could also be used. Microphone > text > translate > foreign text.

Only 1 macro does, the rest use ID's, and some use the text to double check. Changing the banks never did do anything though. Wrong. The 2 main macros (that are used by like 90% of the cheaters at the moment) use edited clients. A lot of the users seem to think they aren't edited though. There is only 1 public one that clicks colours, but it isn't very popular because it's not as idiot proof. They aren't deob bots like in rsc, but they are still edited.

I've been told their new macro detection thing is fake randoms. (by a player not jagex) I gather they just send fake random event id's to the client, but don't actually trigger the random. Regular players will experience nothing, macroers on edited clients will try and solve the fake random = ban. I don't know for sure though, and I'm not going to check the client because my deobfuscator broke with the last game engine update, (you need to make a custom one because runescape is written in runescript not java) and I also can't be [bleep]ed. I've been suggesting jagex ban edited clients on login for a while now, otherwise their reflection system is going to waste... I asked a jmod about it, I can't share the answer because it was in a surgery but it was a pretty bad one. They were quiet for ages (I assume they went and asked a superior) and then gave me a bull [cabbage] answer that didn't really make sense. I didn't press the point because I was already a bit worried they might ban me for deobing the client. I also just have to correct whoever said reductio ad absurdum means disproving by contraction. It actually means exaggerating a point to something ridiculous and criticizing it. People getting banned from edited clients are 100% accurate, there are no wrong bannings there because of the reflection system. With colour clickers, I can see people being wrongly banned because it is almost impossible to distinguish them from a real player. Well over 95% of macroers use edited clients, so I'm guessing jagex are just thinking the few people wrongly banned don't matter.

Ehhh... Jealously is low value, and so is suffocating her. She's your girlfriend, unless you start being a [bleep] or just jealous and needy you have nothing to worry about, so don't be jealous and needy. When you're officially in a relationship you can be the nice guy, but you still need to throw in some stuff to attract her to keep the spark going. If she is hanging out with her ex, and you get jealous, you're conveying to her that he has a higher value than you and you're worried she will realize that and go for him instead. If you aren't worried, you show you know you have the higher value and he doesn't matter because he doesn't stand a chance, which is attractive. Personally I would just tell her I had a bad day or something, and I don't feel threatened and she can hang out with whoever she wants. Why would it upset you honestly? Show her you have a high value, that she is free to hang with whoever, that you don't feel insecure about her hanging with him, and (if the relationship has only been a couple months) you have a willingness to walk away because you're a catch and can find somebody else.

He sounds like a loser, just stop talking to him. What will your parents do? "You be friends with that boy right now!" Can't see that happening. Why are you worried about other people knowing your opinions anyway? They are your opinions, let people know about them..

Getting 3 word answers is normal, I explained why a few pages back. I suggest building attraction by triggering the attraction switches I mentioned earlier, wait until you know she is interested and then move onto the open ended questions to build comfort.

Wasn't caught for much. Smoking in grade 5, fighting in grade 8. A bunch of us used to go to subway at lunch like 3 times a week and it was almost always filled with police, one of them took our names to give to the school one time but nothing happened. I also didn't do physics in my last year because I was always thinking that I was starting a part time apprenticeship within the next couple weeks and dropping it. Went home early/came to school late on the days I had physics first and last and never got in trouble for it. I never understood that actually, since stopping truanting was a huge thing at my school and everybody else was getting in trouble for it :?

I've done it a bunch of times with girls I have never kissed before. I've said it to girls I've known for like 4 hours. (some were drunk, but still..) There is no relationship required and no certain kind of girl it works on. If you have the stronger frame, she will go along with it and enjoy it. I've never had a negative reaction. I'm just trying to say it really does work, but probably not consistently for younger girls. Just like with the awkwardness issue, if you have the stronger frame and are not awkward, then it will not be awkward for either of you. If neck biting is considered kinky on this forum then sure why not... ;)

Ross Jeffries taught it in the 80s, it's fairly outdated but he could attract women using only this technique. I just think it's seedy. I do have a routine that uses a similar idea, just not anchoring with a sigh or something like you mentioned. It's just describing something she enjoys so she starts feeling that enjoyment, with some cold reading added to it. I use an edited version of neil's ev routine - it uses the same idea but it's not as creepy as the way ross jeffries did it. [hide=neil's ev routine C&P]I've successfully used it at the end of attraction phase as I'm shifting into comfort and trust. It allows you to get to know them, captures and leads their imagination, and makes them laugh. Below is the routine quoted from one of Tyler D's posts. "STYLE'S EV ROUTINE: -what is the experience you most enjoy doing? (she'll say dancing or being with family or something) -what is the ideal scenario of you doing that thing. descrive it.. -so picturing that RIGHT NOW, how do you feel.. what emotions? -"so really then, while I was asking you this, you smiled.. and yeah its kind of because I'm being a bit funny or weird or whatever.. but also, its because you could kind of feel that emotion right now, while we were talking about it.. can you feel it.. blah blah" -so really then, even though your favourite experience is dancing, your core value is fun and excitement.. So what's most important to you is the experience of fun and excitement, and whatever leads you to that is most important.. blah blah -OK, so in 4 minutes we've fulfilled your quest for core value. You can die now. IOW, -FAVOURITE ACTIVITY -DESCRIPTION OF HER FAVOURITE ACTIVITY IN AN IDEAL SETTING -WHAT EMOTION SHE GETS WHILE SHE PICTURES THIS -SHOW HER THAT SHE EXPERIENCED THIS EMOTION WHILE PICTURING IT -SHOW HER THAT WHAT SHE REALLY WANTS IS NOT SO MUCH THE ACTIVITY (ALTHOUGH ITS IMPORTANT), BUT THE EMOTIONAL FULFILLMENT SHE GETS FROM IT -TELL HER SHE CAN DIE NOW"[/hide]

When people think they will be happy after certain goals are met, then when they get them they always make new goals and decide they will be happy after they get those.

I'd love to see it as more in depth and interactive, but not as time consuming to level up.

I have said numerous times I'm just giving my advise and anyone can take it or leave it, it doesn't bother me. I'm not about to get into an argument on whether it works or not, and you can stop the personal insults. I do follow my own advise, I obviously wouldn't post something controversial if I didn't know it worked. I almost always either do this, or the "do you want to kiss me" routine for every first kiss. Only other thing on that matter I've done is cavemanning it. If the person saying it is being awkward and creepy, yes it will be awkward and creepy. Yes I have used this particular idea numerous times and never had bad results. Can we move on now guys?

Try quantum physics, the dancing wi li masters is a good read and takes some re-reading and concentration to wrap your head around some of it.

No, it's rape if it's not consensual. In that animal thing I mentioned, the girl can pull away at any time, she can walk away at any time, and she has a choice when asked to bite his neck. A lot of sexually immature people seem to mix 'rape' with 'sexual escalation' :roll: By immature, I mean sexually immature. Those who are new to the dating scene, haven't had much sex etc. (Though general immaturity still applies) It also generally is the qualifier. Try having someone bite your neck (a good bite) and see if you still think that way.

I'm not joking. I did say my advise is for the more mature, and no it's not rape unless you have maturity issues and think it is.

I'm not a great dancer but I make up for it with enthusiasm :lol:

Oh god yes :pray:

what the.. oh

Ehh.. Read my kino post a few pages back about touching. Use that to escalate, if she's your girlfriend all you have to do is kiss her. A cool thing you can do, is this trust test. It's kino escalation, ioi test and a compliance test all in 1. I only use it when I'm on the border between attraction and comfort but you can use it with a girlfriend if you want. Take her hand so yours are in front of you palms up and hers are palms down, squeeze let go and lower your hands. If she squeezes back, ioi. If she follows your hands with hers, bigger ioi. You don't even have to tell her what you were doing. If she asks just tell her it was a psychological trust test, make sure you never give a negative response. So if she doesn't squeeze, or she doesn't lower her hands with yours then tell her she is still building a connection with you. If you are really that nervous when it comes to kissing, here is a quote from my book on that aspect. I didn't come up with this but I can't remember where I got it from.

I was working on checkouts and some old guy is screaming at a duty manager at the front desk. I couldn't understand what he was saying, (think don vito) but she was being polite about it, saying she wants to help him and doing everything by the books. This guy has at least 150 people looking at him, all thinking the same thing. I was serving this guy, picture the classic small old man happy pruny face. He looks at me and says: "Stupid old c**t." I just burst out laughing because it was so true, but it was so unexpected from him.

It's different between f2p and p2p. "Rich" depends on how much everyone else has, and how much you need. I haven't met many people in f2p with more than a set of rune and 100k, I'd say 5-10m in f2p is rich.